all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Because it's not profitable. Modern versions of cathedrals would have corporate sponsors.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    A local sports stadium is named after a drug manufacturer, because I guess, they paid a big sum of money for that... 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    In Canada I think we have at least four different Rogers Place's. Rogers being one of the three telecom companies that form a monopoly on cellular data and internet. And unimaginative, soulless names for stadiums.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    And everyone would riot if the government decided to spend a couple billy building something to look cool.

    Which is why there were protests against Stuttgart 21. And why authoritarian petro states still do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Interesting point. I live in America, unfortunately, and we have giant multi billion dollar stadiums in most major cities that are almost entirely funded by taxpayers. The corporations who's name goes on the front don't pay for most of the costs, it's taxpayers. And most of those taxpayers will never see the inside.

    Although to be fair if Americans ever were to riot I would hope it would be about the rise of fascism and the comically large wealth inequality gap rather than taxpayers funding buildings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wat_Rong_Khun

    Opened in 1997. The murals inside are full of contemporary references like Goku and Master Chief

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago

    This but unironically. What was once a marvel is now mundane.

    Modern skyscrapers are built with base isolation and mass dampening to make them resistant to earthquakes. Have you seen recent cargo ships? Warehouses? They are great and awful in every sense of both words.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Brazilian Giant Rubber Duck

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago*

    Reminder that big government science projects, like space programs and supercolliders, count as wonders.

    The LHC is 27km in circumference. Still not as big as the Great Wall of China.

    ETA: The Burj Khalifa is certainly a wonder of engineering, if it's not regarded as a wonder, itself. But it's the first occupiable tower to exceed Barad-dûr. (Tolkien fans have since adjusted the Sauron's tower to be even taller.)

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Because humans stopped reading in a coherent direction.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I mean, the first one definitely makes me go "Hmm, I wonder why anyone would build that?"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I think they like fish.

    My favourite is this:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I didn't know Yogi Bear owned property!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is in the city I grew up in, the reason is because it's the headquarters of the national fisheries development board.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Fisheries_Development_Board_building

    It's highly likely that anyone visiting Hyderabad will see this building on their way to/from the airport - so keep your eyes peeled!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    We have stopped building wonders because the modern contractor industry is built deliberately to waste as much money as possible by letting it all go towards middle managers and people at the top.

    The government is complicit in financing and upholding this system and has stopped employing people directly to actually do productive building work.

    This is hamstringing us, because it means that we are literally uncapble of building great things. All things we try to build will be infinitely delayed and sever times the original budget. Because then, middle managers will be able to suck more money out of the broken system.

    Bridges in the US now cost more than entire rail networks back in the day or what the sagrada familia cost over 100 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago*

    I get the sensationalism but your position is generally wrong. Projects are more expensive because of multiple legitimate reasons (property / land costs, stakeholder costs, building costs, wages, financing costs). I acknowledge that corruption is a thing. But that's less of a driver than legitimate costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    we didn't, Australia has architectural marvels like the Big Prawn, the Big Banana etc

  • source
  • For a sec I thought the bottom image was DS3 Anor Londo and was wondering what game the upper image was from

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    I present to you, China:

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    When you have slave labor and authoritarian control, building aesthetic wonders is easy.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    I think because finding a quarry with that much quality stone is impossible these days unless you dig very, very deep and ship it likely halfway across the world. Possible of course but prohibitively expensive, not to mention how much fossil fuel will be burned to achieve it.

  • source