all 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 85 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

What in the shit was that fool trying to accomplish?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 weeks ago

    They had a short amount of space to pass (unsafely) before it went back down to 1 lane and think of the inconvenience. They are so fucking lucky they don't have manslaughter of that pedestrian on their record---oniy because it happened to be someone walking who was fast and paying attention--exactly because of how dangerous it is to be a pedestrian.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 3 weeks ago

    lol at that driver pulling a PIT maneuver on themselves.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Who pays for the shit he had to drop to get out of the way? And for the new pair of pants he needs

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Basically he can make a claim on the driver's insurance, although I have a feeling the insurance might try to get out of paying for the pedestrian's shopping since that's kinda hard to prove the loss on and slightly nonstandard

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago

    I see someone had early access to that new Tesla jumping car.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    A wild killercar appeared!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    The couple in the background: None of our business, Keep on walking.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    What the fuck are they gonna do??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    At least react to the loud as fuck crash that happened 5 feet away from them? They keep walking the exact same pace, seemingly unphazed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Your idea of 5 feet is off by a zero or so

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    cars, amirite 😒

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [+] -9 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

    which is why you shoulfd always walk facing oncoming traffic.

    ALSO I only vote for violent anarchistic or communistic candidates who want to destroy car-centric infrastructure.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    He was facing oncoming traffic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

    ....OMG i just realized youre right! ...WTF!?

    Who designed that stroad? They WANT to kill pedestrians at this point I refuse to believe otherwise!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    What's wrong with the road layout..?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    In my opinion there should always be a 'barrier' between the cars' roads and the pedestrians' / bicyclists' sidewalk. A steel fence that can stop a speeding car would be nice but Id also accept one of those rectangular patches of grass surrounded by concrete .

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    the anarchist candidate? Wouldnt they struggle against their cause by legitimating state might?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    nah. The USSR existed as a state obviously, but if you talk to ANY communist worth their mettle they will tell you that communism can only exist in an stateless world. There is nothing wrong with using states in order to bring about a transition phase where states are increasingly no longer existing by the end of the transition. Now, I do Admit that this thing I just talked about is a hard thing to do today and even in the past since most humans today are STILL choosing to be nationalistic shit-for-brains but people need to understamd that oppression will always exist as long as nationalism is also allowed to exist. Once humanity smartens the fuck up, for once, and realizes that we have no need for any forms of oppresion , things will be VERY different.

    ....uh....if humanity doesnt blow itself up with nukes first.

    I have no idea what humanity plans on doing with its future at this point based on the people I talk to IRL and the news. So Im just waiting for either the nukes or a world without oppression...

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -22 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    Y'all, this is AI slop. Look at how the car fucking leaps into the air. It makes no sense at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    That's what happens when tyre face hits tyre face with a collision in this direction. The tyres grip each other and it launches the car coming from behind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    The tire grip is good enough to fling a car 3 feet into the air and make it roll over twice, in an instant, while going 30 mph? I need to know where you're buying tires with that kind of grip!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    In open wheel racing (F1, F2, ...) tyre on tyre contact happens every few races. Yet, somehow, they don't take to the skies? If anything, they have less drag upwards that would stop them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 weeks ago

    are those cars parked all over the sidewalk and ol mate has to walk on the road ?

  • source
  • 16 comments in c/crazyfuckingvideos@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Fight or flight - picked the correct option there.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure the car driver came out the worst out of anyone in that one.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Jfc glad you’re alright man

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    Pants coloring event.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Never run straight away. Whether it’s a tumbling car, an avalanche, a falling tree or some other inexorable apocalypse bearing down on you, it’s likely moving far faster than you can run.

    If you have caught enough of a glimpse of what’s about to paste ya, run at a right angle to its direction of travel. Context also matters: for river flooding, find the shortest path to the highest possible point uphill. For anything above you on a slope, go across the slope, ideally in the direction it isn’t crossing the slope.

    For this dude, the better option would have been to duck behind the car in the bottom right foreground.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Honk if you're an idiot

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 3 weeks ago*

    Clearly it was the fault of the transfem cyclist, just out of shot. They cause roads like this to become so dangerous

  • source
  • [+] -12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)