What in the shit was that fool trying to accomplish?
post
Who pays for the shit he had to drop to get out of the way? And for the new pair of pants he needs
Technically the driver's insurance, but it would take a lawyer. Ultimately they would be responsible though
Basically he can make a claim on the driver's insurance, although I have a feeling the insurance might try to get out of paying for the pedestrian's shopping since that's kinda hard to prove the loss on and slightly nonstandard
A wild killercar appeared!

The couple in the background: None of our business, Keep on walking.
What the fuck are they gonna do??
At least react to the loud as fuck crash that happened 5 feet away from them? They keep walking the exact same pace, seemingly unphazed.
Your idea of 5 feet is off by a zero or so
which is why you shoulfd always walk facing oncoming traffic.
ALSO I only vote for violent anarchistic or communistic candidates who want to destroy car-centric infrastructure.
He was facing oncoming traffic.
If traffic goes both ways, you are supposed to walk sideways in a crab-like manner.
....OMG i just realized youre right! ...WTF!?
Who designed that stroad? They WANT to kill pedestrians at this point I refuse to believe otherwise!
You sound like an alien pretending to know how things on Earth work.
What's wrong with the road layout..?
"People" driving on the left
(I don't believe brits are real)
In my opinion there should always be a 'barrier' between the cars' roads and the pedestrians' / bicyclists' sidewalk. A steel fence that can stop a speeding car would be nice but Id also accept one of those rectangular patches of grass surrounded by concrete .
the anarchist candidate? Wouldnt they struggle against their cause by legitimating state might?
nah. The USSR existed as a state obviously, but if you talk to ANY communist worth their mettle they will tell you that communism can only exist in an stateless world. There is nothing wrong with using states in order to bring about a transition phase where states are increasingly no longer existing by the end of the transition. Now, I do Admit that this thing I just talked about is a hard thing to do today and even in the past since most humans today are STILL choosing to be nationalistic shit-for-brains but people need to understamd that oppression will always exist as long as nationalism is also allowed to exist. Once humanity smartens the fuck up, for once, and realizes that we have no need for any forms of oppresion , things will be VERY different.
....uh....if humanity doesnt blow itself up with nukes first.
I have no idea what humanity plans on doing with its future at this point based on the people I talk to IRL and the news. So Im just waiting for either the nukes or a world without oppression...
That rule only applies when there is no sidewalk available, which there very clearly is here. If you are in the sidewalk you can go whichever direction you prefer.
Y'all, this is AI slop. Look at how the car fucking leaps into the air. It makes no sense at all.
That's what happens when tyre face hits tyre face with a collision in this direction. The tyres grip each other and it launches the car coming from behind.
Basically the tire speeds double and are applied almost vertically to the car behind. That launches the car upwards from the front.
The tire grip is good enough to fling a car 3 feet into the air and make it roll over twice, in an instant, while going 30 mph? I need to know where you're buying tires with that kind of grip!
In open wheel racing (F1, F2, ...) tyre on tyre contact happens every few races. Yet, somehow, they don't take to the skies? If anything, they have less drag upwards that would stop them.
You didn't watch this season of Formula E did you? https://youtu.be/NNWHY8Wp4NM?si=ilbPA50_Nl6sIodK
You ever watch NASCAR? A tire rolling over another tire is like a Mario Kart launching ramp.
are those cars parked all over the sidewalk and ol mate has to walk on the road ?
This happened in 2020 in the UK.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/out-control-audi-misses-pedestrian-21973753?hl=en-GB
Fight or flight - picked the correct option there.
I'm pretty sure the car driver came out the worst out of anyone in that one.
Sick flip, dude
Never run straight away. Whether it’s a tumbling car, an avalanche, a falling tree or some other inexorable apocalypse bearing down on you, it’s likely moving far faster than you can run.
If you have caught enough of a glimpse of what’s about to paste ya, run at a right angle to its direction of travel. Context also matters: for river flooding, find the shortest path to the highest possible point uphill. For anything above you on a slope, go across the slope, ideally in the direction it isn’t crossing the slope.
For this dude, the better option would have been to duck behind the car in the bottom right foreground.
Clearly it was the fault of the transfem cyclist, just out of shot. They cause roads like this to become so dangerous
all 52 comments