Cuck Coding (lemmy.world)
πŸ€– 3
 

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Wait... are vibe coders jerkin' it while the LLM codes for them?

Is that why they're so defensive?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 35 points 3 weeks ago

    "Fuck my shit up boss" rip to your project.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    In some cases you even set rules in advance and give direction during.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I love this term, cuck coding ....chef kiss

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago

    I mean, I get to watch porn while the agent codes. The meme works.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    I call guys who use AI at all "smooth sloperators"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    it would be cuck coding if you didn't constantly have to answer questions and steer the pile of shit...

    it's like a form of cuck coding where the bull keeps asking which position to do her in and if you have any specifications for the speed and if the girth is well sized

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago*

    Ooh yeah baby. Look at your whole service layer getting filled in.

    Nnh... nnh... yeah modularize all of it. Yeahh so hot

  • source
  • [+] -15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (29 children)

    Weak criticism of AI. You could make this same meme about just hiring a human coder, either way you're letting the code be done by some(thing, one) that isn't you

    Edit: Guys I am on your side, simply giving constructive criticism. I don't care if you don't like it, but don't tell me that I'm with AI just for having an opinion

    πŸ’© 3
  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    How's your chair? Comfortable? Do you have a good view?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    I don't agree with vibe coding, I'm just saying that it's a weak analogy

    A better thing to criticize is the credit aspect. They think that telling AI what to make means that they made it, so we should criticize that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Nah, it's still cuck behavior. This isn't a criticism. It's an insult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Okay, I thought we were all about using logic to make our points but ok

    Cuz the one about someone microwaving food and saying "I'm a good cook," that was both a hilarious insult and a good point

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    This is shitpost my friend. This is no place for deep thoughts, thorough analysis or emotional response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I agree but downvoted for no Oxford comma

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)
  • [–] -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

    No, bad finding I'm on your side

    You can't take constructive criticism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    You can’t take constructive criticism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    Hey, what I gave is different than what I'm getting. All I said was that the criticism was weak, and now you're all assuming that I'm suddenly with AI

    I don't care if you disagree. My pet peeve is being told what I think and what I am

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    I don’t care if you disagree.

    And yet here you are, getting upset that people didn't like what you said.

    My pet peeve is being told what I think and what I am

    Then may I suggest that disagreeing with people on a technicality isn't going to end well for you, and you're going to need a thicker skin if you do.

    Also, if you want to win back the room, apology lands better than defensiveness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

    This is what I mean

    You're doing it again, telling ME what I THINK

    That's the only issue that I have

    Like or don't like what I say. I'm cool with that

    But DO NOT misrepresent me and what I stand for. Do not mistake me for something that I am not

    I am not an AI supporter. That's all I want to make clear. I am not what you say I am. That's why I'm upset, not if you agree or disagree with what I'm saying

    Just stop mischaracterizing me

    Do you understand? I am not upset about being disagreed with

    I am not sorry for anything, because I never had a problem with what you claim my problem is. I am fundamentally being misunderstood and that's what pisses me off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    You’re doing it again, telling ME what I THINK

    I struggle to find any text that I wrote that supports this assertion.

    I am not an AI supporter. That’s all I want to make clear.

    All I'm saying is that if you want to make that clear, maybe arguing on a technicality on an anti-AI post muddies the water a bit. Read the room a bit.

    Also, if you want to win back the room, apology lands better than defensiveness.

    I am not sorry for anything,

    Like I say, that's not winning you any friends, and of you blame everyone else but yourself for the reaction to what you said, you will continue to get similar reactions in the future.

    because I never had a problem with what you claim my problem is

    I claim that your problem is that disagreeing with a moderately popular anti AI post on a technicality got folks arguing with you and you aren't well placed to handle the fallout.

    I am fundamentally being misunderstood and that’s what pisses me off

    As someone who is upset at people misunderstanding them, you're sure spending a lot of energy complaining about what you assume I think about your viewpoint on AI, when in fact I believe I made no claim or assumption whatsoever about what you believe about AI, just about what you said and how you said it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

    And yet here you are, getting upset that people didn't like what you said

    I was never upset about them not liking what I said

    That's where you misunderstood me

    I know that you in particular did not misunderstand me on my AI stance, but you did misunderstand me on what was annoying me

    But now that you've made it clear, thank you for having an appropriate counterpoint

    This kind of shit happens to me a lot as an autistic person and you were just here to see the camel's back break in a space where I can anonymously show more negative emotions with less shame. As for reading the room, boy I have room literacy just not an online-friendly amount of it :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    That last bit made me chuckle. Sorry if made it harder to disentangle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    You either die a flamewar or live long enough to see yourself become the friends

    Something something yellow name [MERCY] [SPARE]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Seriously, what kind of relationship do these people have with code. They are equating coding with the act of sex, but the code is something they are creating... So, they are upset about cucking but perfectly fine with the whole insect aspect?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    My dude, you're on Lemmy. You can't go waving your own opinions around. You gotta repeat what the hive mind says.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I thought that was Reddit, why even come here then 😭

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    The entire internet is made up of hive minds these days. There's no escaping that. At least Lemmy's hive mind isn't payed for by corporate shills. It might be a bit weird,but its real... mostly.

    Also there really is room to voice your opinion here, whatever your opinion is. You just have to find the right communities that fit you or even make your own place and that's the nicest thing about thing about this platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -28 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    As soon as this meme dropped there were like 12 big anti-AI accounts that immediately installed this like the latest personality update. It’s EVERYWHERE doing the β€œupvotes please” thing

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    24 comments in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 74 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    My project and I were having problems, but opening things up and bringing in Claude has reignited the fire we once had. We're committing changes like it's our first week together again and adding features we never would have thought of adding before. Some people make fun of me when they see Claude's commit messages in my project, but I'm confident enough in my programming abilities that I don't let it bother me. I know my project and I have something special.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    but I’m confident enough in my programming abilities that I don’t let it bother me. I know my project and I have something special.

    • Linus Torvalds
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    πŸ₯Ά Linux (and therefore me) is gonne be so fucked in five years when they (like every project on the ai hype train) can't understand the spaghetti code (including future ai).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Maybe I'm just being optimistic, but I trust Torvalds. The same can't be said about the typical vibe-coder, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Tbh I trusted him up until the point where he compared AI to compilers. That's just absolutely crutial misunderstanding where the issues with AI usage lies. Comparing using compiler to code, vs using AI to code, is so immensly stupid that I have started doubting him.

    Not because I don't trust in his skill, but because AI is addicting and dealing with additction/risk of psychosis responsibly takes an entirely different skillset. And resorting to toxicity when defending AI with absolutely bonkers arguments, like reducing it's risk to "ShOuLd We AlSo bAn CoMpIlErS? WrItE iN aSeMbLy!!" is not a good sign that he is handling it well.

    And he even compared it to using a fucking text editor to write commit messages, that wanting to limit AI use in commited code is the same as wanting to ban text editor usage. That's just plain insane misunderstanding of what the issues are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    WrItE iN aSeMbLy!!

    What!! You would use an assembler to make binaries to run on a general purpose machine code interpreter instead of using an atomic knife and a salt-accelerator to write the instructions on a silicon die?

    Albsoluridonculoustrous!


    But honestly, if he is saying that, I now have a good reason to assume he can't be trusted with having proper logic in the kernel.

    IIRC one big problem with using AI code in Linux was license of created code. If that is somehow fixed, which is not the case, then it might at least be fine for those coming in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • I don't think it's actual misunderstanding, it's ignoring the real issues. He is focusing only on the technical side of the problem (as if that's the only criticism people have about AI) and I fear his pretending there's no ethical, societal and economic problems is deliberate - as opposed to an oversight. If you look at the number of influential former AI critics/skeptics recently changing their tune like Linus, it looks to me like they are simply all buying bought up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This allegory is legit depressing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago

    Does that mean the open source projects are "gang-bang coding"?

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    This will make waves in the work GC

    Edit: I sent it, nobody laughed, don't do it

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago*

    Im a straight up voyeur, thats fucking claudes project. Im just out here shouting now do her doggy.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    Hey, no kink shaming

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    when you watch a movie are you cuck producing a movie?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago

    Illustrating the common POV that mockery has the same weight as making a rational point.

  • source