top 75 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 167 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Wow. Bravo mapquest team. I wish they would come on here and speak to their brand renewal.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

    You can help too!!

    Check out DeFlock, and by all means, come join us on OpenStreetMap. It looks like about 400–500 cameras have been added in the last few days.

    If there's anything I can personally do to help you (yes, you, reading this) get involved with OSM – even just a pep talk – I'll do whatever I can. There are a million different ways you can help, regardless of if you're in Paris reading the WikiHow for heisting the Louvre or stranded in the wilderness using your last five minutes of battery to browse Lemmy.

    Source: Reasonably longtime user and contributor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately I really wouldn't trust the numbers on new cameras. In my area most are already mapped and there's a steady stream of misidentified cameras being added. Stuff like DOT and traffic light cameras.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I think the new companies that are like Flock, but not Flock, are starting to incorporate all the cameras. Those are probably in the Flock system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Question, because I'm not finding much information on this. Supposedly we can incorporate overlays from OSM into CoMaps that shows Flock camera locations on our routes. Would you have any information on how to do this or a resource that could show me how? Thanks in advance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I wish I did. :(

    I've never heard anything about this. In fact, I've never heard of overlays on CoMaps generally. My only guess is that maybe the rumor is related to OsmAnd, which does let you create custom overlays given a URL source.

    I only use CoMaps on desktop, which is to say not very often, so I'm a lot less familiar with it. Sorry!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    No problem. Thanks for answering. I found something saying that it does work with CoMaps by enabling surveillance poi as a custom overlay in CoMaps and to do that you import that data from openstreetmap. You're probably right that it was for OSMand. I will try and find out more. Thanks again for answering.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 65 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    TIL that MapQuest still exists

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    Recently in the news for defying Trump's "Lake America" BS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Kinda? They use osm data and osm didn't change the name so neither did map quest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Initially they did for the Gulf of Mexico too, just a matter of time til they "correct" back to approved government posting stateside

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    This is dope, BUT Mapquest is just a wrapper for OpenStreetMaps, and this is data that you get for free with OSM.

    Also, after install, Mapquest immediately asks to start tracking your behavior for targeted marketing shit.

    Mapquest probably doesn’t actually give a shit privacy or fighting authoritarians. They just want a cheap and free data set, and the cheapest thing available automatically has LPR data and doesn’t rename bodies of water to “America.”

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I've heard that said a few times but I have used both and MapQuest is infinitely more accurate and usable. I tried osm first and half the addresses I typed in couldn't be found unless it were a major city. MapQuest I have not had that problem so they either use a different data source or they amalgamate multiple sources for more functionality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Oh shit, I didn't realize OSM had a Flock locator. Is it working as a layer in OsmAnd yet? I'll check..

    EDIT: Nope, or at least I couldn't find it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Just installed it and yelled "Holy shit!". I didnt realize it was this bad already. I only thought there were two in my area. This is fkn nuts. We are indeed in a surveillance state.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    This, together with datacenters, will be dystopia. I suggest you spread this information to ordinary people who work in congress, and go on news and talk about it. If you can.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago

    Fuck yeah dude shoutout to mapquest.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    All of them or just the reported ones? Because someone discovered 100k+ undeclared cameras (or so they said) spread around.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    The ones reported to OpenStreetMap.

    Mapquest is basically a wrapper for OpenStreetMaps, so they kind of get this for free.

    Also, all of the major flock reporting tools are built on OSM. So basically, if you use Mapquest, you will get data from DeFlock users.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    people also need to look at axion/axon , motorola, they definitely are using those now too.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    If MapQuest could get public transit directions as good as Google, I’d drop them completely.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    If MapQuest could keep their location listing up to date I'd 100% make the switch. I went to a small brewery a month ago and it took me to their previous location, which they moved out of...2 years ago

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago

    They might be using OpenStreetMap to populate their map. If that's the case, you should consider updating the map yourself! I update OSM all the time when I go to new places or find discrepancies in the map vs. reality.

    If you contribute something like 30 edits per month (sounds like a lot but if you start adding unmarked footpaths, roads or building footprints to the map you can hit 30 edits in a matter of minutes) you can get free OSMand Pro, a map app for Android. Every time I go on a trip I make sure to hit the edit threshold to grant me Pro access for the month. Lots of great features!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago

    Yeah I was using it a bit myself to see how alternatives to Google Maps would work, and it really messed up on the way to a barbershop. It was maybe a previous location for them too, but I also knew this place's immediately previous location which was sort of in an alley behind their current place. The other one? Who knows, but it was miles off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Another W for MapQuest

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Does this include non-flock brand flock cameras?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    They’re using OpenStreetMaps, and OSM has a DB of all the major LPRs. The filter just pulls in all the surveillance cameras in OSM, and if you click on the camera you see the meta data about the reported camera type.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Looks like I'm going to be paying for an app possibly for the first time ever. I've had the free version for a while but they've earned my money

    Edit: damn it crashes a lot :(

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    Now if only MapQuest could track police down to the last inspector and beat officer.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    Round of applause!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Waze does this in my neighborhood. All are labeled as police cameras.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Can't find this "surveillance layer", is this a paid feature?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I wasn't seeing on android, checked for update, sure ebough there was an update available, updated, and now it's there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Why can I not find this setting in my app?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Now we all know where to avoid aiming projectiles.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Well I'm glad somebody's doing it because DeFlock's app was designed by someone who doesn't understand UX. It's so clunky and unintuitive. Hell, the "navigation" feature doesn't actually give you turn-by-turn directions FFS!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago*

    Will it navigate around them? Does it show other manufacturers such as Axon?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Based MapQuest??

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Well that's a pretty nifty feature.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Killing it mq

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] -5 points 3 weeks ago

    While certainly cool and a middle finger to the man, it's just one more thing for dumbass drivers to be distracted with. And an increased chance to get stupid and maybe kill someone.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Their comeback has been unreal, I love it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Hell yeah MapQuest! Glad to hear they're still making improvements, and this is an important one, especially not just focusing on Flock.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    friendly reminder that capitalism subsumes all criticism of itself into itself

  • source