Source?
No worries! Their format is strikingly LLM-adjacent, so it makes sense anyone would come to that conclusion.
Your grammar just blew my mind. Thank you.
FWIW, Axios has been writing articles in that style for years, well before the rise of LLMs. This article may well have been penned by an LLM, but the presence of a Why it matters second isn't as much of a smoking gun as it might seem.
I honestly wasn't aware of other platforms that stream games for free. A quick web search tells me that Sony offers cloud streaming as part of Playstation Plus Premium, Steam lets you stream from your PC to other devices. I couldn't findany other cloud game streaming services that don't require a charge or subscription; would you point me in the right direction please?
Good evening to you as well.
I'm not arguing that Microsoft is some saint or that they've done nothing wrong. This just seems like a dumb reason to get mad at them. If you buy a digital game from Microsoft and have an internet connection solid enough to stream the game, you likely have the bandwidth to download the game.
You can still buy Xbox games on disc (I sometimes buy discount games used that I missed the first time around). And I read recently that signs are pointing to the next Xbox also having a disc drive for games.
I'm with you on private/rented servers for sure. I still remember all the hoopla about support for dedicated/private servers vanishing the first time around.
Microsoft wants to charge for providing a service? That seems completely fair. Streaming a game isn't free for them.
Maybe? I'm not sure what these options for speed and red light cameras do:

I wasn't seeing on android, checked for update, sure ebough there was an update available, updated, and now it's there.


Hating one thing just because you hate another thing sounds completely irrational.
If A creates B, and A is worthy of hate, it's not necessarily irrational to hate B as well. Context is important; in some cases, hating B would be irrational, in others it would be logical. Your point is too absolute to be correct.
In the specific context of the use of LLMs, it can be perfectly fair to condemn the existence and use of Claude, Copilot, ChatGPT, Grok, etc. because of the harm their billionaire owners and investors are causing to the world, even if the LLMs aren't otherwise necessarily bad.