The New York Times reported on Wednesday that the US government is preparing to send troops to Latin America under the pretext of combating drug trafficking in the region.

According to the US publication, 600 troops from the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, NY, have already begun deploying to the jungles of Panama to conduct exercises alongside the local military.

In addition, it was reported that members of this detachment will participate in operations in other countries in the future: “The troops will eventually train with local forces in Colombia and Honduras, and could also support US Special Operations troops advising militaries conducting raids against accused drug traffickers, the officials said.”

The peoples of the region, alongside anti-imperialist and progressive forces, have long denounced decades of US military intervention in Latin America and the Caribbean. Various experts and analysts have shown that “war on drugs” projects have never led to the elimination of these illicit businesses. On the contrary, US military involvement has coincided with an increase in violence, drug production, but most importantly: neoliberal reforms. These reforms involve the dismantling and reduction of the state, the privatization of all possible dimensions of social life, and the destruction of social organizations that oppose neoliberalism.

Read more: What else is behind the “fight” against drug trafficking in Latin America?

Historically, this process of material dispossession has been facilitated by an expansion of US military presence, under the pretext of the “war on drugs.”

The report stated: “The deployments and growing headquarters, which have not been previously reported, along with the Pentagon’s recent movement of several MQ-9 Reaper drones from Africa to Colombia and Ecuador, mark the latest widening of the Defense Department’s fight against drug traffickers in the region.”

Shield of the Americas

For several months now, US forces have been participating in intelligence activities and supporting military operations in Ecuador, whose government has entered into agreements with the US to allegedly fight organized crime. However, it was later revealed that these operations didn’t target drug traffickers at all. In at least one instance, The New York Times reported that the US and Ecuador bombed a dairy farm.

This collaboration is part of the new military and geopolitical strategy led by the Trump administration, embodied in the agreement known as “Shield of the Americas.” In recent meetings, several governments have committed to working with the United States so that their militaries can carry out joint operations in Latin American countries.

Regarding the possible itinerary of the soldiers who are expected to arrive in Panama, The New York Times reported: “The soldiers will move first into Panama, where they will take part in jungle training exercises, officials said. From there they will head to Colombia, where they will participate in what officials have called Southern Vanguard, an exercise scheduled to begin later this month. Other rotations will move into Honduras for training with local partners. Some of the troops could be used to provide additional security for US helicopters in the region, which have been providing support for US Special Operations forces.”

For about a year now, the United States has been conducting airstrikes on small boats in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean that Washington claims are linked to drug trafficking. Over 200 people have been killed in the strikes and the majority of the victims appear to be fishermen from Venezuela, Colombia, Trinidad and Tobago, and other island nations. Victims’ families and survivors have vehemently denied any connection to criminal groups.

Washington claims the report is false

For its part, the US Embassy in Panama stated that The New York Times report regarding the deployment of several hundred US soldiers to the Caribbean nation is untrue: “The New York Times article alleging the deployment of 600 US soldiers to Panama is categorically false.”

The US Embassy reported that 120 US military personnel are currently participating in a training course in the Panamanian jungle, but that these troops will return to the United States on October 25 and therefore will not undertake the deployment announced by Colombia and Honduras. It did report that other US military personnel will participate in exercises in Peru.

“This is nothing new. The Jungle Operations Training Center has been operating for over a year as a school officially recognized by the US Army. US and Panamanian instructors jointly provide training in survival techniques and jungle operations,” the US Embassy in Panama said in its statement.

The controversy between The New York Times and US diplomatic officials over this report comes amid an evident increase in the US military presence in the region. In addition to operations in the Caribbean and the Pacific, there was the military incursion into Venezuela on January 3, 2026, which resulted in the capture of then-President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, as well as the deaths of more than 100 people in Venezuela. Furthermore, President Trump himself has suggested that he could attack Cuba and any other country if US security is compromised.


From BT News via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
17 comments in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post
[–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's my personal theory that the US is going to back a bunch of cartel operations to take over the governments of countries in Latam that don't support them. But first they'll go in and kill the cartels leaders and get puppets in charge of them. Then they do some coups and put those people in as viceroys over the entire country with the cartel as their power base.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    in argentina in santa fe, rosario (where messi was born) there's been a huge increase in the narcos. this is the worst place since it's a port city so there's a lot of movement and shit, and while it's not in levels like mexico or colombia we've definitely seen them get way bigger. it was nothing like this 20 years ago. drug addiction is way worse too, i see people pipeing crack everywhere. before when you snorted you could maybe do 10g in a crazy night, with the pipe you can smoke that in way less. you just cant get enough of it. last year there was contaminated fentanyl that killed almost 200 people. where you reckon those came from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's way too complicated for these Apes. There is no way that Trump could sit through that pitch, in order to greenlight it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    That's not how the US works. Some career dude comes up with the big plan and pitches it to the president in pieces. Like "Let's bomb this thing." "Let's sanction this guy." and so on. That is why who the president is has no effect on US foreign policy. They just sign the papers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    Even the former peaceful Costa Rica is now building a mega prison, and inviting US meddling in the affairs of public security.

    The US getting involved I don't think has ever brought more peace to a latin american country.

  • source
  • Gotta secure the region now that staying the global hegemon seems more and more like an impossibility. One day, insha'Allah, Western imperialism will be nothing but a really bad collective memory.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Trump knows those cartels have zillion$, and he wants to get his beak wet. He will trade pardons for payments.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Same as it ever was.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Good article

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    That's not exactly breakthrough news the US has been running fairly large scale counter narcotics missions down there since Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)
  • 3 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    And the US admin is telling Canada not to 'interfere in their elections' by... responding to unfair (and illegal, due to unilaterally tearing up our signed free-trade treaties) tariffs... fucking hypocrites.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    The American Empire. You guys really think Republicans are just going to politely sit down?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    what could go wrong, the last few times they were in S.america.

  • source