"Ad hominem" is when you try to discredit an argument BY attacking its speaker. Someone saying something about you that you took negatively doesn't mean they're trying to attack your argument that way. They might just be changing the subject off of noticing problems with your approach.

Well, that's what should have happened.

Every election here is a missed opportunity to put in an actual resistance to take the system down. People make a million excuses on why we all need to settle for the worst or second worst candidate, and that's who we end up with, every time, because the population talked themselves into it.

Assuming the FBI isn't just making it up

A heavily documented simple algorithm. Not an original, complex, reasoned out system.

Really just a continuation of the same process that started in 1492, if you want to be holistic about it.

It's not great at coding. I'm on about my fifth "rewrite large system that's a pile of AI slop" job this year, trust me.

What's their excuse for the million times they did this before LLMs

All are risks.

"Illegal cryptographic keys" = "illegal numbers"

Online, mostly. More written and audio than video.

There's a bit.