Now, I'm not saying that it's a dumber idea than putting rocket thrusters on a car...

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 3 weeks ago

I can't believe they weren't a total complete absolute bigly success.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Strange, my company that turns smartphones into VHS machines is doing fantastic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    FWIW, it was a janky range extender rather than a full combustion drivetrain. Effectively turning the Model 3 into a plug-in (series) hybrid.

    It's not the worst idea in itself - EREVs are very much a thing that meets some people's needs. But trying to retrofit an existing Model 3 into one seems difficult, complicated, unreliable, and most importantly, expensive. All to make it happen on a brand that heavily markets that they are electric only. On top of that, they chose the cheaper "affordable" model instead of the luxury model, meaning would-be consumers are going to be much more price-conscious.

    If it wouldn't expose their incompetence in a competitive (and well-established) marketplace, it wouldn't surprise me to see Musk pivot to fossil.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    It definitely was the worst idea. If you want an EREV, you can just buy one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    It was a dumb idea because range anxiety was a complete fabrication of the auto media. IRL, Tesla owners didn't need more range. No demand = no money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    Right, I feel like the only person who would buy this is someone who has never had an EV, wants one, but is also scared of range anxiety. This person would also have to be willing to spend a huge amount of money on an unreliable, poorly built car. I don't think that person exists.

    Anyone who has owned an EV will tell you how much range is not a big deal. The only time I think about it is when I'm planning a road trip, but I don't think most people are doing that often.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Well duh. Who on Earth was going to pay stupid money to buy a car from the most (in)famously overpriced electric car brand just to put an ICE in there??

    It'd genuinely be like buying an IPhone just to immediately put Android on it. Like it defies the premise of buying the thing in the first place.

    • People who like ICE cars would surely just buy a fancy ICE car for that price.

    • People who like electric cars wouldn't be putting an ICE in there in the first place, and would also probably just buy a better electric for that price.

    • And the people specifically into Teslas wouldn't want to rip their brand new car apart to install an ICE, because part of the brand of Tesla IS the electrification.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    According the their original article apparently the plan wasn't to pay for a full price car then do an expensive modification - but was supposed to be cheaper to manufacturer them that way in the first place.

    Not sure wtf they were thinking, since that's now how the real world works. Like Tesla would ever be like "Oh here you go, here's a partially finished car from our assembly line. Go ahead and do what you want with it and resell it."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Further evidence that Teslas are cars for people who hate driving.

  • source