all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 1 month ago (10 children)

...and now he's and "enemy of the state", for using the term "AI" instead of "SI".

What a timeline we're on right now.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Have you seen the shit he's pulled off? We do not want him as an enemy of the state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Maybe he can show Trump the Consititution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    And show him where the treasure is? i don't think so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    His psychic powers are totally fuckin bogus, too, in the sense that they are completely unbalanced. He can see the future during a vision of the future thus exploring parallel alternate realities depending on his constantly adapting choices.

  • source
  • parent
  • 30 comments in c/television@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 92 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Best reason for the cancellation of I show I liked that I've ever heard.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago

    would love him in true detective!

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well, Nicholas has the clout to tell them to fuck off, but most actors trying to make a name don't. So they'll just boil the frog unless SAG makes it a thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    I think we would have all gone to see Digger if it was Nic Cage instead of Tom Cruise.

  • source
  • [+] -20 points 1 month ago (19 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    It's widely regarded as being great. I would love to hear your reasoning. Granted season 2 and 3 weren't as good but season one is legitimately a gem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

    One excellent season followed by three utter dogshit ones.

    The flaws of the show are clear in the first season, endlees numbers of red herrons, pseudo intellectual idiotic dialigue and reducent scene after redudent scene, but the chemistry and performanecs of Harrelson and McConaughey masked them.

    The remaining seasons were more if the same without Harrelson and McConaughey, though Ali did almost carry the third season.

    It is mind boggling the love this show gets, then it is also equally mind boggling the love Cage gets..

    Then again, what do I know, I mean time is a flat circle, herpa derp…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I loved the first season and I genuinely love your take enough I want to watch it again to see if you're correct.

    Remembering what stood out for me was the narrative vision having a single director and writer steering the ship.

    Imho it should have been one and done but it was too popular so they just had to fuck it up and make more seasons because American TV is goddamn stupid.

    BBC would have done a single season run and be done with it and no one would think anything else of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    The first season outside of the two leads does have some amazing moments, The shootout in the housing project and just The overall feel is excellent, I agree it should’ve been a one and done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I can't say you are wrong tbh. The red herring was quite frustrating in the forth season, I didn't dig the ending. They do have stellar casts that really carry it but I wouldn't say it's anywhere near bad though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Season 2 was terrible because HBO forced them to do a second season right away before giving them time to write a decent script. I thought Season 3 was good. Season 4 was well made in all respects, but I just didn't care for the story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    There are always lots of reasons the train wrecks… and none of those change anything, the train wrecked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Cage is great when the director is good. E.g. ‘Matchstick Men’ and ‘Leaving Las Vegas’. And of course ‘Vampire's Kiss’ is Cage dialing up his style to the max.

    However, if Cage is the best thing about the film and the film is not ‘Vampire's Kiss’, things are gonna be tough.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    2 really was not utter dog shit. The worst part about it was the fact they didn't have a single director. Many shows wish they could have written a season 2 of TD, and I am a season 1 stan

    three was... meh. Felt too performative in the writing (returning to the tropes of s1 like multiple timelines and buddy cop) and reddit solved every twist. That's how formulaic and predictable it was. I watched maybe two episodes of s4.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    S2 was utter dogshit.. I swaer to god how many scenes did Vaughn and Reilly debate what it means to be a parent four…five? How many times did Ferral pass out at the bar with the chick singing her garbage song.

    It was a season of nothing happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children)

    to each their own I suppose. I thought it was a cool season compared to any other show. Hard to compare to S1. I cant stand all the melodramatic acting these days, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    You take S2 of True Detective over, the Wire, breaking bad, band of brothers, chernoby, GOT 1-3…

    You do you, pal..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago*

    no, but admitting it isnt the best tv has to offer doesnt make it dog shit. S2 came out in like 2014 or something. Also band of brothers and got are both based off of books. Of course the writing is gonna be good. There are issues with s2, sure, but i wouldn't say its the writing. As a complete story told in a single season it is pretty good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -40 points 1 month ago*

    I watched one scene of his spider man show and I'm fairly certain it would of been better with AI instead (and I say this knowing that AI is currently nowhere close to usable for making shows).

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/tvmovies@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I think this is Nicholas Cage's first public stance on anything, ever. And it's a good one. Nice

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    Well shit, thats respectable. Good on him.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    good. fuck amazon

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Can we just have him do a straight noir show? He was so good as a grizzled detective.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago*

    "2.6 billion minutes"... Fucking marketer turds. They could use femto seconds! Number will be bigger! Pathetic.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Any "AI friendly" human being at this point is an idiot at best, and an asshole at worst.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Just as well. The show was fun but 62-year-old Nic as Spiderman was always a reach.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah it kind threw me out every time when he'd move like a 60 year old and then he puts on the costume and suddenly moves like a gymnast and loses a bunch of weight. But then also still talks in a 60 year olds voice lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I mean, Spider-Noir was always a grizzled old man. He wasn't the youthful spry Peter Parker we see in most versions of Spider-Man. He's Ben Parker, Peter's uncle. (I don't think there's a Peter Parker in his universe though?) And he's your stereotypical beat-down, cynical, drunkard of a detective.

    The spider powers probably give him some crazy energy and agility for his age, but when he's not in the suit, he needs to look and act like his age so no one suspects him. So I personally think the difference between masked and unmasked Spider-Noir worked very well in the show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment