I get him recommended all the time but his thumbnails and doomer titles don't look appealing (they're all 1/3 his face). In general, if all a Thumbnail/title elicits is some kind of emotionally loaded tired cliche (AI will kill us all, Reading is dead, We were this close to all being hacked by Jia Tan, Overpopulation, Underpopulation, the decay of [Art Form, Daily Pastime, Emotion, Other Noun], We Did Transgressive Investigative Journalism, Epic Scientist Battle of the Equations, you may add to gis list) I don't watch it. If it promises cool news about topic, or personal story, I do. Also, I still hate Enrico Tartarotti for some insufficiently explained reason. (he made a video basically dissing vim at some point, and I don't even know how to use vim)

all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I read that title and I click away. Miss me with that gloom. I want educational content.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I keep forgetting about thumbnails. One of the first things I do, when installing or reinstalling a browser, is get DeArrow to remove the clickbait and custom thumbnails. I just found them off-putting for too long.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    I get trying to remove clickbait thumbnails, but getting rid of all custom thumbnails seems harsh. My thumbnails might be pretty basic, but I make them by hand and would hate to be lumped in with clickbait channels

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I don't think it's a harsh decision. The thumbnail isn't what provides enough information regarding the video itself, it's an aesthetic which I find irrelevant to the content. If the title is engaging enough, that's what will interest me to click it (regardless of whether someone is a big or small creator).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Only video of him worth watching is about child actors because he was one. The rest is boring and gloomy imo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    A shitty thumbnail = unsubscribe / do not recommend channel. Take out the trash

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    I have some plugin that just puts an image from inside the video as a thumbnail. Very nice not having to see gaping grimacing youtubers when on youtube.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm not a fan of the "I promise this is interesting" thumbnails I see everywhere on gaming videos. They rarely live up to said promise.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Unfortunately that emotional reaction from clickbaity/doomy stuff can work really well for some. The few times I've tried it, it hasn't worked for me, so my thumbnails aren't (I think) particularly doomy.

    However, I focus on tech though, so a lot of what I talk about definitely has a cautionary tone, like the story this week about Muse's security vulnerabilities, or the Gamers Nexus investigation of LGTV's a few weeks ago. I sprinkle in jokes here and there to try and keep these topics lighter and more accessible.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    You seem to slightly think that the only purpose of a thumbnail is to get people to watch the video, but you neither like taking this maxim to the extreme by tricking people emotionally, nor does it even work for you. Or do you think that a thumbnail should be emotionally honest (not dry on purpose, just not more sensationalist than he topic deserves), and tell the viewer what the video is about? Or a different thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    or worse yet: you can tell the actual video is at the bottom and at the top there's some random roach just making o-faces over and over for attempts to get famous as a reaction tuber ? (I don't know)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

    It appeals to a lot of Gen-Z and Gen-A. They don’t understand nuanced topics and can only see things in stark black and/or white. Either a thing is wholly doom, or it’s the best thing they will ever see. There is no middle ground.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

    The blone guy had to shove a dildo up his ass to make this thumbnail. The other clickbait one is where they have to stretch their mouth open to suck a cock then edit it out to make the thumbnail. And they always come with a vauge question title to maximize their audience brainrot

  • source
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Don't worry. You don't need to use vim.

    Vim is mid-late 1900s software with colors added, essentially propped up by momentum and clique ritual, supported by efficiency tropes tired already in the '90s. Its only value is dopamine from the daily coping with its interface and a feeling of belonging to the elitist therapy group of similar survivors. It's doomer prepper but in editor form.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments