all 79 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 124 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Recently renamed to super diesel.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Artificial diesel didn’t have the same ring to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (20 children)

    I don't know how this can possibly work in practice.

    One, this may relieve the federal diesel tax by "allowing" red fuel but will not exempt state and local taxes that he has no authority to affect, meaning it may still be illegal at the state level to run red fuel.

    Two, the red fuel dye used to identify untaxed/offroad fuel is aggressive and can be detected at extremely low concentrations. If dyed fuel has ever been in a tank it's detectable for months if not years afterwards (depending on how much it gets refilled) and even then, sometimes they can swab the fuel cap for residue and detect it indefinitely. If a state trooper decides to have a tank dip done to inspect your fuel after this tax break stuff you are capital-F Fucked.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Two, the red fuel dye used in untaxed/offroad is aggressive and can be detected at extremely low concentrations, if dyed fuel has ever been in a tank it’s detectable for months if not years afterwards (depending on how much it gets refilled).

    In other words, it fucks up the ability to tax diesel even long after the crisis is (theoretically/optimistically on Trump's part) over. Considering that they could have just suspended the tax on non-dyed diesel and directed refineries to stop putting the dye in temporarily, but didn't, one wonders if that was the real goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago

    Absolutely fucks up the tax system. It would be a disaster for commercial trucking and I am betting you will not see widespread use of the untaxed fuel even if "allowed" as no operator wants to get on the wrong side of DOT after this is said and done.

    This of course does not apply to light duty trucks and diesel cars where rednecks run red fuel in them almost all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Hanlon's razor has been getting an exceptional workout these days. It could just be that Trump is monumentally stupid and didn't think about this at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Trump is monumentally stupid, but that doesn't mean his Wormtongue-esque advisors are. Trump probably didn't know red-dyed diesel existed before this; he definitely didn't come up with the idea to let truckers use it himself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    During his first term I would consider this to be a more likely explanation, but second-term Trump has been doing a pretty good job of purging anyone with actual competence. He wasn't happy with how they kept telling him what to do last time around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    We don't tax fuel enough to maintain the roads as is. The states that are removing the gas tax going to see really terrible roads in the coming years because the funding mechanism went away. It also means we might have to shift to registration fees as the primary mechanism to fund roads, which we were already considering for electric cars but then we're going down this road you might have to make it Universal to all vehicles, preferably increasing with vehicle weights

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The states that are removing the gas tax going to see really terrible roads in the coming years because the funding mechanism went away.

    Maybe, but more likely they're just going to use more money from the general fund like they already do. Only 26% of the road infrastructure budget came from gas taxes to begin with. So yes, the funding would drop if they don't make up the shortfall with other funds, but not as much as you think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Three, if demand for red fuel goes up, so does the demand for home heating oil (it’s the same thing in my neck of the woods).

    I hope it’s a mild fucking winter or a lot of senior citizens are gonna freeze to death this year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Not entirely; off road diesel is usually the exact same distillate as on road diesel but dyed for tax purposes. AKA the distributors quite literally pull the diesel from the exact same bulk tank but then dye it for delivery. Both onroad and offroad are a ultra low sulfur refined base oil with motor lubricity and cleaning additives. Actual heating oil is a similar distillate but without all the motor fuel additives and (i think) looser sulfur restrictions. It usually comes from a different supply chain than offroad diesel, except in more rural areas where it may be regular dyed diesel for supply chain reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    I’ve never tried running heating oil in a diesel engine, but it works the same as diesel in my Chinese diesel heater.

    My info is probably 30 years out of date back when Mercedes bros would run it to save money in highschool. The same guys were messing with veggie oil a few years later, which I much preferred.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Oh yeah, back in the 90s before ULSD was a thing it'd be fine for sure... Older diesels would be fine with it but you might have issues with it in modern diesels expecting low sulfur and the other additives

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Completely agree, but alternatively: is there enough red stuff and red pumps to meet demand even if it wasn't a stupid idea for the reasons you gave? I doubt business owners are going to taint their existing tanks for the reasons you gave, and there's not enough of a guarantee this scheme will be around long enough to build new infrastructure for it, and the massive fueling stations on the interstates damn sure don't have red tanks/pumps ready to go.

    Does this even put a dog in the fight for the businesses who add the dye, or who sell the red diesel? If market manipulation like this were a goal, why not just put a tax holiday on all diesel?

    Edited to remove idea someone else already posted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    In farm counties sure, there's probably double the amount of offroad diesel storage than there is onroad, they'd be fine. everywhere else though good luck lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 43 points 1 month ago (19 children)

    Donnie is getting desperate.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (15 children)

    Per search, red-dye diesel is untaxed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Also stated at least three times in the article you didn't read – as early as the second paragraph of the main prose.

    Major Hellstrom from Inglorious Basterds seeing three fingers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    There is no text in the article, it's just a headline. I can take a screen shot to prove it, but you're just a nobody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure if you're using a broken app or something but there is definitely text there. Here are the first three paragraphs.

    President Donald Trump has allowec the use of cheaper red-dyed diesel. typically reserved for farm operations, to be used more broadly in an attempt to bring down record-high fuel costs

    Trump signed an executive order Monday evening stateside to temporarily allow truckers and farmers to use red-dved diesel - which is exempt from highway fuek taxes - and deferred related taxes on the fuel through the end of this year

    The tax-free diesel is typically used by farm equipment, construction machinery, trucks and other off-road vehicles. It is therefore exempt from a 24.4-cent-per-gallon tax applied to dliesel fuel sold for highway transportation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Here's an archive of the article if you're wanting to read it and having technical difficulties (or for anyone else who is; sorry, the Wayback Machine doesn't capture the full article).

    I was never going to assume you were lying about your experience if you claimed "there is no article"; it'd be such a batshit claim if you knew one existed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    This is what the CNBC link looks like in my browser backing up my "batshit claim".

    Since we're now insulting each other, I want you to know that shortly I will block you, as Lemmy is a much better place when we're not interacting with people who make us want to insult each other. Goodbye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    backing up my "batshit claim".

    I said "it'd be a batshit claim if" followed by something that I acknowledged wasn't true – a hypothetical. As in it would've been batshit to knowingly lie about that. I understood why you couldn't read the article, but why you couldn't understand this basic if/then statement is beyond me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I hope you realize that you look like a complete dickhead in this exchange.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago

    Just forestalling the inevitable and making it worse at the same time.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Welcome, comrades, to centrally-planned economy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Louisiana declared a state of emergency recently to allow the same thing lol

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    More correctly that's well yes but actually yes. The gas tax money goes to roads. The fact extra money is needed does not negate the fact gas tax money goes to roads. Without gas tax, even more general funding is needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Tax relief to soften the impact of high fuel costs is pretty normal government thing. Is why tax-free diesel exists in the first place. Trump's mistake was causing the high gas prices.

    It's interesting to see Trump floundering on what he thinks will be popular among voters. Doing things that help Americans is an afterthought, he's scrambling like a failing student for extra credit ahead of the Final.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yea, an additional issue here is that those taxes were used for things. Removing them does save people money, but the increased price ends up costing us both at the pump and also in lost tax revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Is why tax-free diesel exists in the first place.

    Tax free diesel exists because the dyed diesel is not being used on public roads. Fuel taxes aren't random government money grabs, they directly fund roads, bridges, and other highway infrastructure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Fuel taxes aren’t random government money grabs, they directly fund roads, bridges, and other highway infrastructure.

    That's the budget the revenue from them goes into, but it's only a drop in the bucket compared to the total cost of that infrastructure. The road system is massively subsidized from sources other than driver user fees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Sure. My point was refuting the other user's claim that "tax free diesel only exists to be a tax relief mechanism".

    Off road diesel is still taxed, you're just not paying the FHWA excise tax if you're not using it on highways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago

    He just doesn't want anything that might slow down/stop/reverse his smash-and-grab being done on the United States. He's giving himself and his family billions of dollars.

    Also, he wants to stay out of prison.

    Having Democrats run both houses of Congress could be a (mild) risk to him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    Right... So now there'll be a heating oil shortage this winter. Perfect.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Tax free fuel from the fool.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Won't that only cause the price of AG diesel to raise?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Sure, but it's not like they have much need for diesel right now. The crops have all finished growing, there's just that "harvest" thing they need to do before winter comes and everything stops. So they're like 90% done already, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Depends on what kind of farming you're doing. Ranchers need fuel year round. Citrus fruits harvest in the winter, greens, broccoli, cauliflower, brussel, cabbages, root vegetables, and alliums are winter harvest crops in some regions, and potatoes and sweet potatoes are harvested in late-autumn.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    if that is true, then the refineries already know this, have reduced the amount of red dye diesel they've recently produced based on seasonal demand, which would mean that there's not that much red dye diesel available, which makes this whole exercise more or less pointless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I dont understand why they cant just temporarily stop tasking it.

    The only reason red diesel exists is so they can detect it later if its used outside its specific usecases. If everyone gets to use it then whatd the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Some places use the same diesel and just inject red die at the nozzle. Or if they are filling bigger tanks add the die then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    cheaper, for now, until it’s not and home heating oil is jacked up, etc.

    they know what they’re doing.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I love how it's all because of the Ukraine war, definatley couldn't have anything to do with the fucking iran war he started. Who's writing these articles jellyfish? Whatever it was it didn't have a spine.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Mountain Diesel, Code Red

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    would be hilarious if the dye fucked up modern truck engines

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    This is a Let Them Eat Cake moment.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    This is tax free agricultural diesel. If regular diesel is out trucks can purchase this tax free. He basically stopped the DoT from checking tanks for tax free gas.

  • source