The issue is recording someone without consent and posting it on the internet for profit, not what the women are wearing. You saying they should have worn something else is blaming the victim for the act of the person that did the actual thing that is wrong. Again, classic victim blaming. And before you say "They should have known that is what the ride does," yes, hopefully they knew that and consented to riding it with that information. That is still not consent to be recorded without their knowledge and have it be posted on the internet.

Because they did not do the thing that is wrong. The person who filmed them did. Blame that person for doing the harm, not the people who did nothing wrong. Saying they should be wearing shorts takes the focus off the perpetrator and puts the burden on the victim. Hence, victim blaming

I think you are the one who didn't read the article. The ride was only mentioned in the beginning as the thing that started the cycling shorts use trend.

It goes on to describe how widespread the practice of upskirting is at Oktoberfest in general, and how many workers are having to wear them to avoid being filmed and how patrons are concerned the law doesn't protect sharing film of the wind picking up a skirt and briefly revealing something.

And you got my point exactly. Why are we blamed for people taking upskirt pictures of our underwear or bare bottoms. Just because our skirt wasn't down to our ankles and so tight around our legs we could barely walk or we wore sexy underwear, doesn't mean we were to blame for tempting them as is often the excuse in cultures that don't strictly criminalize and enforce punishment of the practice.