US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Wednesday that three men—none of whom have served in the military and two who make billions of dollars from it—will help lead a new Pentagon project on the “future of warfare," even as he moves to eliminate hundreds of senior armed service leadership position, including many generals and admirals.

Hegseth unveiled Project Meridian during his “State of the Force” address at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia. The 120-day initiative will examine emerging technologies that the Department of Defense believes will be critical in future warfare.

"America's best minds" will be brought together to “reimagine what warfare will look like in the future,” Hegseth said.

To that end, the defense secretary said that "Project Meridian will be co-led by three of our nation's best minds, Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey, and Newt Gingrich."

Musk, the world's wealthiest human, is already deeply involved in US national security infrastructure through SpaceX—the recipient of billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts—and other businesses. He was previously part of the administration as the de facto leader of the Department of Government Efficiency.

Luckey, who like Musk is a major Trump donor, is the co-founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries. Last year, he said that Anduril planned to produce “large numbers" of cruise missiles, fighter jets, and other artificial intelligence-powered weapons systems.

“If we have to fight Iran, and China, and Russia all at the same time, we are screwed,” Luckey said in pushing for more arms production.

Gingrich is a former Republican speaker of the House of Representatives who had been pushing for war with Iran since at least 2005. Like President Donald Trump, he has been accused of dodging the draft during the Vietnam War by receiving numerous deferments; in Trump's case for bone spurs, and for Gingrich because he was a student and a father.

"Those three great Americans are going to be joined by a team of senior leaders, hand-picked private sector leaders, and subject matter experts from across our nation's unmatched innovation, academic, and policy ecosystems," said Hegseth—whose Senate confirmation last year was so contentious due to concerns about him being unfit for office that it required a tie-breaking vote by Vice President JD Vance.

The defense secretary also announced the creation of an Autonomous Warfare Command—or Autowarcom—"a new four-star combatant command with service-like authorities built to scale autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force."

The appointments come as Hegseth simultaneously pursues a major reduction in the military’s senior leadership. He announced Wednesday that the Pentagon would eliminate 20% of its roughly 800 general and admiral positions by January—doubling a previously announced 10% reduction. Hegseth described the cuts as necessary to eliminate “redundant force structure” and “unnecessary bureaucratic layers.”

The reductions follow the removal or early departure of more than two dozen senior military and civilian defense officials since Hegseth became defense secretary.

The contrast has drawn criticism from lawmakers and military observers, who expressed alarm at the prospect of removing experienced officers while handing an influential role in planning future war to warfare technology executives and a hawkish former lawmaker who is no longer accountable to the public.

"Interesting. A board loaded with defense contractors and one draft-dodging war hawk will decide the future of the US military," NewBlue USA executive Marty Taylor said on social media. "What could possibly go wrong?"


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 1 month ago

The cruelty is the point

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I never thought we'd get to this point so soon.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Fat asses whose cholesterol is near the tipping point are trying to lead the military. GTFO

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 26 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    "A board loaded with defense contractors and one draft-dodging war hawk will decide the future of the US military," said one observer. "What could possibly go wrong?"

    It's OK though: they're overseen by a drunken TV host, and he's overseen by a senile pedophile rapist, and in any case all the big policy decisions are made by the zombie-eyed, hairless, friendless Nazi lurking in the shadows.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Last I recall Elmo thinks that stealth aircraft are pointless because they can be defeated by "cameras and AI" or some such. He literally thinks he's the smartest engineer in the world when he's not even an engineer.

    This amount of corrupt rot and dunning-kruger has the promise of being a fatal bowie knife to the kidney of American military power, so I can't say I'm too unhappy.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    They actually had to hire someone who's job it is to make sure Elon never talks to engineers. Because he had a bad habit of firing them when they contradicted him.

    Which they did because he knew nothing about what he was talking about.

    This problem was so bad it lead to a hiring crisis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    I think they also have a team at SpaceX to keep him away from important projects.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Not surprised.

    Billionaires are not the best and brightest of us. They are people who merely have a lot of money which buys more money. They don't innovate, the success of their companies is in spite of them not because of them.

    And I hope to see the revolution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Especially these tech billionaires since most of their ideas and what they got off the ground with were already either being worked on by other people or are so basic of ideas that wouldve come about regardless. Just to use Henry Ford as an example the assembly line was revolutionary for the time since it allowed labor specialization on each step of production allowing for quick and cheap production via volume, which was a massive step up from the previous method of artisan assembly where a person or team of people worked on one vehicle at a time. Not to say Ford wasn't a dumbass but he had an actual skill for logistics and production.

    Meanwhile look at Musk had he never invested in Tesla electric cars would've still become popular, hell without Tesla absorbing market space it's possible one of the more established car companies wouldve jumped onto the market niche far sooner. Also I don't think Musk is in possession of any skills.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Just to use Henry Ford as an example the assembly line was revolutionary for the time since it allowed labor specialization on each step of production

    Colt did it over 60 years before Ford. Ford's big achievement was coming up with a way to effectively apply it to car manufacturing. He was also very good at design for manufacturability, and design for maintainability with the widely available tech of the day. A blacksmith could fix a lot of things with a Model T.

    Ford was not a dumbass. He was, however, a control frek, a racist, an antisemite and a proto-fascist.

    Musk, on the other hand, has never done anything but own things. When he had to make decisions at PayPal, they were so bad that he was fired.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • My point exactly in a far more succinct way. Though I will point out that it wasn't necessarily just cars that it was applied to but a lot of large products as well, a bit like when your playing a game and unlock a small version of a tech and then get a large version later.

    Regardless Musk may as well be Ford but with none of the positives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    A bag of potatoes would conduct more electricity than that groups brains.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    The other two, sure, but Palmer Lucky has actually been developing autonomous weapons for some time now... And he also sold Meta the Quest V1 which kicked off the current phase of VR technology some 15 or so years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    A basket of deplorables. In charge of our nation's deployables.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They need to be luigied before they start WWIII

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Palmer Luckey is Matt Gaetz's brother-in-law.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    It makes sense when you realize the future of warfare will be on the US population.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    What the fuck do you mean by the future of warfare? That's the most mask-off way of saying The Forever War is the endgoal itself. Why the fuck are we allowing these assholes to make so much money on murder?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    So that failed community college lecturer Gingrich is part of this brain trust? Republicans revere him as an intellectual because he's read a book or two, and even had a few ghostwritten.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    That's quite the motley crew of misfits he's assembled there.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 month ago
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    the creation of an Autonomous Warfare Command—or Autowarcom—"a new four-star combatant command with service-like authorities built to scale autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force."

    This is how skynet gets built.

    Except it's dumb, has no self awareness, and it constantly hallucinates. And it's designed to target minorities.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Bad, but not as bad as it sounds at first. It's an ((Autonomous Warfare) Command)), not an (Autonomous (Warfare Command)). The latter would indeed be Stupid Skynet. If their ridiculous orbital data center idea ever actually gets built, though, housing Stupid Skynet would be its ultimate purpose. So General Grok can command the killbot army while the poors are burning every terrestrial ai data center they can find.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    That's interesting, but recent tests by a Swedish arms manufacturer included a autonomous murder drone which had a local AI model.

    I don't think Hegseth's murder drone army is going to be controlled remotely, else it would be vulnerable to signal jamming.

    By autonomous, he means they make their own decisions. Currently that's a violation of the UN, but Russia and the US are actively working together to change that in Geneva in a few months.

    The "stupid murder drone army" will be fully autonomous. We can burn every terrestrial or extraterrestrial data center in the universe, and it will have no effect on them

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I'm from the future... in 2027 you will got to war lead by a Palmer, an Elon and a Newt.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Okay, now can people stop covering the War Crime Gameboy? Like, can we all just agree to fully shun it? He's gonna bomb the children that Elon doesn't want to diddle, it's even less funny now.

  • source