Brazilian officials, pro-democracy advocates, and US lawmakers are growing increasingly concerned about apparent efforts by President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to interfere in the Latin American country's upcoming election.

Reuters reported Wednesday that Brazil's spy agency "confirmed the existence of interference from the United States as well as Russia" in the presidential election, the first round of which will take place on October 4. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is running for reelection against Sen. Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro—who is currently serving a 27-year prison sentence under house arrest for orchestrating a coup attempt in 2022.

Democratic lawmakers in the US have raised alarm about the Trump administration's election meddling in Brazil in recent days as the contest approaches. Earlier this week, Democratic Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (NH), Peter Welch (Vt.), and Tim Kaine (Va.) wrote in a letter to Rubio that "over the course of President Trump’s second term, we have seen US officials engage in a campaign of interference and destabilization in Brazil."

"The administration’s most recent actions point toward an effort to interfere with, and potentially undermine, Brazil's general election in October," the lawmakers wrote. "Senator and presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro’s recent Oval Office meeting with President Trump, undertaken while attempting to mitigate a domestic political scandal, underscores the administration's willingness to insert itself in the election."

The senators' letter followed a separate demand by more than 30 Democrats in the US House that Rubio "confirm whether the administration will commit to respecting Brazil’s electoral process and to recognizing its certified outcome." The House Democrats demanded a response from the Trump administration by October 1.

"Particularly given the tragic history of US involvement in the 1964 military coup against Brazil’s democratically elected government at the time, as well as subsequent US support for the resulting military dictatorship," the lawmakers wrote, "the United States has a responsibility to support the democratic institutions that so many Brazilians, across generations, struggled to build."

Trump has been a vocal defender of Flávio Bolsonaro's father, saying he is "not guilty of anything" and describing his prosecution as a "witch hunt"—echoing Trump's attack on investigations into his own effort to subvert the 2020 election in the US. Last year, Trump hit Brazil with a 40% tariff, accusing the country's leaders of "persecuting former President of Brazil Jair Bolsonaro."

"It was not just a trade maneuver," political scientist Octavio Amorim Neto said of the tariff in an interview published Thursday, noting that "Bolsonarism explicitly applauded [Trump's economic attack], while Brazil’s traditional right did not vigorously defend national sovereignty, saying that everything was Lula’s fault."

Over the summer, Brazil denied visas to two top US State Department officials "whom the Trump administration planned to dispatch on a mission to cast doubt on the fairness and integrity of the country’s electoral system," The Washington Post reported in July.

Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, wrote in an op-ed for The Los Angeles Times earlier this week that Trump’s intervention in Brazil's electoral process "undermines a basic and generally cherished right to self-determination, as well as the right to democracy itself."

"It is even clearly illegal under the Charter of the Organization of American States, to which the United States is a signatory," wrote Weisbrot. "The Trump-Rubio interventions, with the collaboration of the Bolsonaro clan, have made the Flávio campaign into another US regime change operation. This should be defeated, for the sake of Brazil and the whole hemisphere."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Start hanging american interlopers in public and maybe they do less of that shit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 20 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Not the first time, not the last time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    They stole elections in Chile, Columbia, and El Salvador, just for starters.

    But there was a huge uproar over Nicaragua cancelling elections when faced with alleged systemic manipulation and fraud. It's just easier to believe a Leftist Government Hates Democracy than to acknowledge that the bourgeois in these states are stacking the decks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago

    Uhm... I don't know the details of the other countries but Nicaragua is a de facto dictatorship. Elections haven't been fair and free for many years now.

    Any systemic manipulation and fraud there is done by Ortega and the FSLN, they control everything. I remember the transition very well because I lived there and saw with my own eyes how Ortega consolidated power and eliminated political enemies, independent journalism, and civil society.

    I happen to know quite a lot about this and I really don't understand what point you're trying to make. I'm sure the US is trying to meddle in Brazilian elections but that has nothing to do with the dictatorship in Nicaragua.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    That is one of the many internationally illegal things Trump has done. When he is done with his term, you could probably fill a two story museum with all of it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Fuck the alarm. Do something.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The US has overtaken Russia in foreign election tampering.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    It's long been the case, if only because Social Media is almost all controlled by US companies (with the notable exception of TikTok, and notice how hard the current US administration is trying to control it) and it has a lot more money than anybody else to do such things with.

    I mean, Steven Bannon came to Europe some years ago with millions of dollars from the Koch Brothers very openly to "create Far-Right parties" (and "by an amazing coincidence" the Far-Right which was until then only successful in a few countries, really took of in pretty much all of Europe after than) and Cambridge Analitica was paid with American money to via Facebook manipulate British public opinion in favor of Brexit at a time when many American politicias were very openly calling the EU an "adversary".

    And don't get me started on even older US Government interference in various European countries before the time of the EU, especially the smaller ones.

    Whilst it seems logical that Russia is trying to shape politics in other countries in a way that favors its interests, since they have nowhere the same amount of money and own none of the media (not just the social kind, but also things like News Agencies) shaping public opinion in those countries, they're not in fact in a position to have anywhere the impact that America can have in the politics of at least most of the West.

    Of course, in South America which gets treated as "America's backyard" it's even worse and has been so for far longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago* (8 children)

    Nothing's going to change unless Americans start changing their lifestyles and start living more respectfully with less of the priveliges that allow them to live within constant escapism.

    The "freedom" America offers is not the freedom that makes humanity prosper as an organism. The freedom America offers is the ability to live outside of universal reality and escape from universal truth.

    Generally the same goes for all modern 1st world nations...

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    And for rising developing countries, who just want a taste of what the West has had for a while. Can't blame them, but you're right, none of this is sustainable, we just haven't seen the long term results yet so think it's fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    I have a more achievable idea. How about we directly address our fascism by deleting our fascists?

    We are infested with over 100 million conservatives. If we finish Sherman's work, the fascism will stop cold because there will be no more fascists among us. Our civil war was not finished properly. Showing mercy and allowing pure evil to continue living here was a deadly mistake.

    Nothing can change until we eradicate the evil that causes our fascism. Conservatives are cancer and must be dealt with as such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    100% agree. People are too docile. This doesn't end until those that perpetuate it fear for their lives.

    It sucks you're being down voted, because it truly is the only solution. Tolerance of intolerance fixes nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Now do BC and Alberta.

  • source