all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Ive been saying this since I was what, 6 years old, riding around seeing tons and tons of empty buildings like huh, we should fucking utilize what we have.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    In germamy its the same. For 2022 there were 262.600 homeless vs. 1.900.000 empty apartments

    Hard to find actual numbers for empty flats but homelessnes has risen to over 500.000 in 2025. If empty flats would not be used solely for trading and are leaved empty to fuel the rents, there would be no need for anyone to sleep on the streets.

    Homelessness is intended in capitalism. People have to fear it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    How about the offices that are moving to work from home?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Lots of city planners advocate for it. Of course not every building can be converted but most of them can and they're actually fairly popular.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Specialization of development says no. But it's been saying that repeatedly and no one seems to get it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (6 children)

    "Build more luxury flats" isn't actually a bad answer either, since any increase in supply (even luxury) applies downward pressure on the price of the existing stock. They should do both.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    This only makes sense if the large landlord conglomerate that likely owns them isn't happy to just leave them empty to keep the upward pressure on rents.

    This is also why we'll continue to have problems unless we get state-owned construction companies - the landlord conglomerates that have the money to get new apartments built will never commission enough apartment blocks to actually drive down prices, instead trickling in supply to keep prices where they are, or higher (regardless of the incentives). These are the problems we face in Amsterdam, anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This only makes sense if the large landlord conglomerate that likely owns them isn't happy to just leave them empty to keep the upward pressure on rents.

    Introduce pro squatter rules, if a housing unit hasn't had a person living their for X amount of time - Anyone can live there for free, everything will be rented out asap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    By "use" you mean "steal" or what?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    regulate it, for example some tax for people who dont use it and don't rent it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago*

    The empty homes are situated in areas where people don't want to live. So if you choose the punishment route, you'll also want to tax the people who refuse to move to those empty houses.

    Also: the largest German cities already punish renters who leave flats empty for too long. Allowed vacancy around 3-4 months, maximum fine 500 000 euros.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    In my country housing supply still hasn't recovered from 2008 while population increased. So it is supply&demand thing like all the economists are saying. Is there any eurostat statistics for housing developmemt across EU?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I'm very suspicious of this line. The whole Western-world has the same issue: a housing crisis. It's more likely a minority are buying everything and leaving houses empty to jack up rents using computer systems. In Australia the real estate agents all use the same system. It's a software monopoly controlling the whole market. Australia, Canada, USA, europe? All have a housing crisis? Really? Meanwhile China... just fucking build commie blocks.

    Same story everywhere. Here in Australia there's more than enough empty houses to house our growing homeless population. Housing is a human right.

    I just want to state: it's a fact asset classes have been over inflated over the decades as a result of asinine monetary policy. This is a disaster. Governments have failed their citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    It for sure doesn't happen here. Buyers are individuals, and not much is sitting empty. It would also be pretty stupid thing to do. Right now housing is so expensive that it makes no economic sense to buy and rent out, because rents at least have a cap in form of people's salaries.

    In 2008 whole west had a banking crisis which involved real estate. In my country we had 10 years of underinvestment while population grew due to immigration. Pandemic low interest rates shot everything up. Now we are here. I would rather call this incompetence of those at the helm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    With software let me phrase it this way: ebay increased the prices of goods domestically because anyone could search up the 'value' of an item in a global context. This resulted in sellers demanding ridiculous prices locally. Yes, an American using USD might buy that from you at that price, but no local will. They're not even listing the item for sale on ebay, just using it as a tool to price. Sellers are all independent, but ebay had a large effect on all those independent sellers. The real estate agencies are likewise being pushed to increase rents in a similar phenomenon.

    In Australia it's often parroted that 1/3rd own a house, 1/3rd have a mortgage and 1/3rd rent. The mortgaged property didn't magically appear. The rental property has an owner. that's 1/3rd that controls the 2/3rds. A minority owns the land and jacks up prices for the majority. Yes, there's limits on what a market can bear. We're there. That's why it's termed a housing crisis. The homeless population is increasing. The pool of renters is increasing.

    It's not incompetence in the Australian context either. It's literally been in the making for decades. Everyone knew what the results would be. It was deliberate. It continues to be deliberate. A minority are getting very wealthy off the backs of the working class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    What about, and hear me out. Give incentives to investors to turn buildings we already have into luxury flats.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca view that post

    Don’t forget have people sign up for a lottery to get sed housing and have them waiting for a response for 3-5 years ☺️

  • source