you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 month ago* (6 children)

"Build more luxury flats" isn't actually a bad answer either, since any increase in supply (even luxury) applies downward pressure on the price of the existing stock. They should do both.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    This only makes sense if the large landlord conglomerate that likely owns them isn't happy to just leave them empty to keep the upward pressure on rents.

    This is also why we'll continue to have problems unless we get state-owned construction companies - the landlord conglomerates that have the money to get new apartments built will never commission enough apartment blocks to actually drive down prices, instead trickling in supply to keep prices where they are, or higher (regardless of the incentives). These are the problems we face in Amsterdam, anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This only makes sense if the large landlord conglomerate that likely owns them isn't happy to just leave them empty to keep the upward pressure on rents.

    Introduce pro squatter rules, if a housing unit hasn't had a person living their for X amount of time - Anyone can live there for free, everything will be rented out asap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment