Parastoo Ahmadi sang while wearing a sleeveless dress during a concert livestreamed on her YouTube channel in December 2024. Iran's laws ban public performances by women and require them to wear headscarves and modest clothing.

Iran's judiciary launched proceedings against the 29-year-old after the video went viral, gaining millions of views, saying the performance was "in violation of the country's legal and cultural regulations".

top 63 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 163 points 1 month ago (20 children)

The worst part about Trump being the fucking man-child that he is is that the regime hardliners have now an even firmer grip on power, as he once again proved that there is no way of appeasing the US outside of complete capitulation.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 135 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Most analysts determined that Iran was in a political death spiral and that the worst thing the west could do was interfere. If the west stayed out of it, all signs pointed to a significantly more moderate regime change. Trump took office, Israel baited him, and Trump bit, like the moron he is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Almost like a secular Iran isn't in Israel's geopol interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Conservatives need a Boogeyman

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Also a "democratic Iran" means unsanctioned Iran. The last time sanctions were partially lifted, Iran's economy grew by 7% per year. Such economic growth means production growth. Production growth means arms prod growth. And that's arms that can "fall into the wrong hands" and could be used against Israel after one "wrong election." If I wanted to dominate the region militarily, I would do anything in my power to keep Iran under strict sanctions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Funny thing, I've recently-ish listened to a podcast from late 2024, before Trump took office. The guest predicted that Trump would attack Iran because Republicans cover their shitty policies with warmongering, and Iran was the weakest of available targets.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I was really rooting for the New Iran movement. Tankies called me a fucking zionist for it.

    Now those hopes are shattered. Fuck trump, and fuck netanyahu.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    The New Iran movement was literally a western op, Trump himself admitted they armed them. There is no case where Iran has an internal struggle and the US doesn't exploit that opportunity to steal their resources and immiserate it's people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    The New Iran movement was going on for a lot longer than the student protests last year that people like you were trying so hard to dismiss as western imperialism.

    The New Iran movement has been going on at least since Mahsa Amini was beaten to death in custody for not wearing a hijab "properly." For you to dismiss that as a western op is as chauvinistic as it is insulting. As if the Iranian people have no agency, and need a brutal regime to protect them from the Evil West™'s meddling?

    Of course Israel and the US would try to co-opt such a movement, but that doesn't mean the movement itself was inauthentic. And trump tries to take credit for everything, so I can't believe you're actually attempting to cite his facial rectum as a credible source.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    It takes a certain kind of genius who can take a pariah state on the verge of collapse and turn it into a kind of underdog while destroying the world economy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    With their supreme leader dead, why didn't the moderates in that country arm up and take control?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 month ago

    Most of them were killed in December and January trying to do just that. I've seen estimates as high as 50,000, but most are reporting 30,000-36,000.

    The exact numbers are impossible to verify because Iran shut down the entire country's internet to cover it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    5 Weeks left for this asshole to do what he wants. The left has to come out in such large numbers that results cannot be disputed effectively by anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Then what? A law which says to stop military action against Iran that the Supreme Court strikes down? Cutting budget to ICE that the Senate filibusters?

    I'm not saying that it won't be better, but the rot runs deep and can't be removed by a single election.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 1 month ago

    no criticism of iran for you in this analysis

    are you like piker, supporting palestine, iran, even bin laden because america bad?

    meanwhile this poor woman wiill be scarred for life if she even survives. i guess there's no way of appeasing these fundamentalists either

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 66 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Ain't theocracy horrible? Members of the Trump administration desire Christian Nationalism for the US, and were it come to pass, we'd see similar things, like systematic discrimination against LGBT people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago*

    USA is already seeing the moral decline from religious influences. With extreme discrimination of minorities, and taking away the right to abortion.
    Absolutely if this is allowed to continue it will get worse. But USA is already a country heavily influenced by religious fanaticism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 1 month ago (32 children)

    An appeals court in Iran has confirmed a sentence of 74 lashes handed to a prominent singer who performed without the mandatory hijab,

    Absolutely immoral demented and savage. Only religion can make otherwise "normal" people behave like outright sociopaths.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

    Religion didn't make this happen, sick conservative fucks use religion as a scapegoat to be sick fucks. Pay attention most of these twats don't actually follow their religious teachings, just cherry pick what they want to oppress people. Same shit we deal with in the USA with the bible thumpers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    sick conservative fucks use religion

    Aaand there you are, religion most definitely plays a role to justify that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Right, my problem is u said only religion can make regular people behave this way. My argument is that these are far from regular people, these are phychopaths that use religion as justification. No "regular" person comes to the conclusion somebody needs to be lashed because they didn't wear a hijab.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Sorry comrade, but mass murders and genocides have also been perpetrated by atheists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yes, though religion is more problematic due to their holy books having loads of these things they can and often use to justify it. Shit people will always exist, but let's not pretend the situations are similar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    So doing evil things because iNvIsIbLe MaN iN tHe SkY is abhorrent and reprehensible, but doing it just because they want to gets a pass?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    True, atheists holding an ideology that is equally extreme to religion. I never claimed religion has exclusive right, it's just the most efficient and most common way to lure people into insanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Genuine question; what are you referencing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    I left reddit because of 'enlightened' opinions like these.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Sorry what? People complaining about the shit religion does and did is why you left?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    No it's the blind blame on religion, as if any of this has anything to do with spirituality that's in part why I left. Redditors can't think for two seconds about the headlines they're reading, and neither can the guy I commented on. This shit is all about power and control, none of it is about any spirituality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    Religion enables things that the human nature (like wanting power, getting things) already has. This is not blind hate. It is more like how I can hate laws that discriminate or whatever. If we just boil everything down to such level of human nature, there is not much left to criticize, is there? Or the other way around, you would have to critique "everything" since most people want power, drowning the key problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    Pretending it's religion that's enabling these evils distracts from the real evil in the room. Religion is merely a distraction, a tool to achieve the goal. The goal is always control and power. By placing the focus on religion, you're saying that if we 'solve' religious extremism (this is a very racist train of thought that I can get into if you'd like), we'll get rid of these terrible actors, while you and I and everybody with an inkling of critical thinking skills know damn well that if it wasn't religion they'd use something else as that tool. Shared trauma is a big one that's used often.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    We need to remove these evil tools even if they are going to then use others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You want to remove religion? Won't you be just another oppressive asshole then? What's the difference between a regime that forces their religion onto people and a regime that forbids people from following their religion? Both are extremely authoritarian, you're just pretending it's for a more noble cause, while a religious person would say they're doing it for the more noble cause. You're no different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    And once again religion proves how full of shit it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    religion is just the excuse. It's conservative men who are full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Can you define conservative? What are they trying to conserve? The old ways, traditions, right? What even is religion if not tradition? They are the same.

    It makes no sense to try to absolve religion of any responsibility for this kind of shitty behaviour, just because there are some young people who are still in its thrall.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    She's lucky to be alive.

    This is life under Islamic rule. There are no PRIDE parades in Iran. You better keep your head down and your mouth shut, or they will murder you.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›