I hear meta's also funding a lot of the lobbying behind all the digital ID laws because all the LLM fakes are destroying its personal data revenue.
post
I assume this will result in a slap on the wrist and maybe some lawyers will make a bunch of money but the people harmed will get like a dollar and Meta will view this as the 'cost of doing business' and just harder to not get caught next time. These types of things have to be company ending for them to keep people in line...
violations of state consumer protection law
Then presidential pardon is not an option.
NATIONALIZE THEM
At this junction in time that could be the worst possible solution. Giving instant access to the widest cross section of the planet via the information in WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, and the entirety of Facebook right now is the con wet dream.
Don't get me wrong, I'm certain they already have all that information on those sites. Every DM, deleted and disappearing message. The damage is done by poisoning those wells even further than they are.
When I say nationalize I mean publish trade secrets, give people power over their own identities, use profits to fund social programs, etc. I am suggesting a drastic change, not just the govt now owns the same fucked up company and runs it as corruptly as it always has. The fact is, it was the government, that is our tax dollars, who funded and designed the first of the super data centers. Remember Ed Snowden? He revealed the NSA was already building these things, but in the USA conservatives actually want to privatize everything. Publicly held data centers dont make any money, they lose money. That means less money for campaign contributions, lavishly paid speaking engagements, or vise-like control over the economic production of rural territory.
There is nothing stopping the feds from getting personal data from any privately held company, period. There is no difference in the government's ability to track us, regardless of who owns the servers. Companies have to comply with requests from the feds, not like Meta or Google ever reject any requests anyway.
The difference is that a nationalized industry is hypothetically subject to political pressures. A private company is not nearly as much. The whole point of "dont let the feds get access to our personal data" is moot when they already have it, and they just allow companies to use it to exploit us rather than exploiting us directly. Nationalizing industry doesn't fix capitalist overreach, but it does harm the capitalist class, which is good for the working class.
So I reassert my premise, N A T I O N A L I Z E - T H E S E - F U C K E R S
Stop just fining these fuckers! They can afford any amount you fine them with. Shut down the service and charge them with crimes or gtfo.
Normally I'd agree, but if one of the more populated states fined meta at this rate it'd be a corporate death penalty
For context - New Mexico has a population of 2,124,222, making it the 36th most populated state in the country.
That's under 1% of the country. California has 39,355,309... No company currently in existence could survive a 4 trillion dollar fine
This is huge.. if it goes through
This is huge.. if it goes through
Not really. This is a lawsuit about the whole Cambridge Analytica scandal back in 2016. While the penalties could technically be up to $200 Billion... they won't actually be anywhere near that high.
Back in August, they settled another multi-state lawsuit for the same stuff... for $18 Billion. And that was for settling with 48 states. New Mexico and Florida were the only two states not included in that lawsuit. There's no way in hell the punishment will be anywhere near $200 Billion for the same actions in a single state.
The only other state that could continue going after them for these actions is Florida since the other 48 states all settled.
So this issue is effectively over, and it fizzled out with a slap on the wrist as everyone expected because we don't actually punish large companies in this country.
This is huge.. if it goes through
Like I said, this is huge, if it goes through
$200 billion isn't a slap on the wrist, it's a real punishment. Facebook can't just cut a check and continue on, they're going to have to make hard choices if they are made to pay up. Florida alone could still drain the company dry on this case, but more importantly it sets a precedent
Since we don't have a functioning system of corporate punishment, it's all case law. I'm sure Facebook is going to fight it with everything they have, so it's not nearly over... But if this goes through anyways? That could change things
If 43 million violations of the law aren't enough to shut something down, what is?
Fuck if I know. We can revoke a corporate charter through an act of Congress for any or no reason, we have trust busting laws that allow courts to split a company, individual states can decide to restrict or kick out a company...
We have mechanisms to do these things, but we don't really have a system of corporate criminal punishment. It's one of those problems of using an early version of democracy... Courts can fine and impose sanctions, they can prosecute individuals for their part, but as time went on instead of legislating a system of corporate punishment it's just been left to case law
Which doesn't work out well, because corporations have grown to the point they can dump more way money into legal defense than the courts can put into prosecution
So the answer to your question is basically that it doesn't matter how much they violate the law, they're to big and too powerful for the courts to handle them with the tools available
Thanks for the thoughtful answer, but that's all pretty depressing.
Yuuup. There's people overseas always demanding Americans take back control and stop the madness...
It's like, my brother, you have no idea what you're asking. We have so much to fix. We don't even have the mechanisms to fix the foundational problems yet. We are working on it, all of it, while also fighting like hell to avoid letting tens of millions die for easily preventable reasons
And the world's most powerful interests are fighting every single little step of the way
So, sorry to depresses you, but I do appreciate the empathy
fuck around and find out. it might make other corporations think twice before breaking law
it'd be a corporate death penalty
Good. Facebook should be shut down and liquidated.
Rip the fucking bandaid off.
Huh, first time I've heard a reasonably sized fine
I assume they will settle for 100mil and a promise to not do it again.
The federal government has interceded and the new penalty is $1.9 million.
How much you want to bet they paid off the administration secretly for that help? There is no doubt.
Today: Zuckerberg whispers in Trump's ear. Tomorrow: Trump announces trade tariffs on Mexico and Venezuela.
This is New Mexico, a US state. Even so, Trump will prob still tariff them.
Mate, as if he knows the difference 🤣. He'll probably rename it New America.
Today: Zuckerberg whispers in Trump's ear. Tomorrow: Trump announces trade tariffs on (New)Mexico and (says it's because Trump declared they're now part of)Venezuela.
The could, and probably should, but they won't.
People always upvote some form of this comment on every post that contains potential good news. Sometimes y'all need to keep your pessimism to your fucking self. It's exhausting.
Sadly this is not pessimism but just realism. You are free to block me if that's too uncomfortable or annoying
No, commenting "it won't happen" on every single fucking post is pessimism. Sometimes good things happen.
commenting "it won't happen" on every single fucking post
But I don't do that, I can't be blamed for actions of others
If it's not you it's someone else, and it's still pessimism. And people still upvote it, because everything is bad, and all good news is actually bad news.
If you want to stick your head in the sand and hum happy tunes to yourself, give’r. We’ll be up here living in reality where, in fact, most news is bad news for the poor in America. Sorry?
Facebook denied the claims, arguing the company has adapted its policies since the state’s lawsuit was filed in 2021 and that it removes 99% of content that violates standards. In a deposition played for jurors, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the company had robust systems to determine whether content should be taken down.
Yes, standard violating content like ads for a play with content from Virginia Woolf. Feminism is for sure "standards violating content" in a fascist state.
And they could even pay that off in 200 easy instalments!
That's why all these tech guys are licking trump's cankle holders. Like calls to like.
all 16 comments