cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1417762/stanford-university-uses-ai-to-replace-white-male-with-black-student-beautifies-asian-pe

Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises recently used AI to change the races of the students it included in its advertisements. AI was also used to noticeably slim down and alter students’ faces.

On his journey to campus, Stanford student Billy Ramirez ’27 was sent an image he recalled a Stanford photographer taking. Upon closer examination, he noticed that he had been removed from the photo and replaced by a AI-generated black woman.

Source: The Stanford Review.

Stanford University Uses AI to Replace White Male With Black Student, Beautifies Asian Peer

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 1 month ago

This makes them look more racist

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago

    Ah sweet digital blackface.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago

    If someone decided to yassify me before adding my picture somewhere, I think I would take 1d10 of emotional damage.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago

    Kind of reminds me of how my old uni would have photographers running around campus at the start of the semester each year looking for minorities to photograph, but this is so, so much worse.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    “Marketing colleagues, our job is to pretend our student body is diverse and appealing to the male gaze.”

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    I agree in general to say Fuck AI for most of it, but in this case AI is irrelevant, it's just Fuck this school, they would have done the same with Photoshop

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    We need more diversity, also the diversity we have.. make them non ugly

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    ...Star Ginger...

    This looks like it came straight from a South Park episode.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Absolutely unnecessary.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    The college I went to, I interned and was tasked to shoot photos. They told me to look for blacks straight up.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Absolutely unhinged

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/tech@piefed.world view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    White guy got "Chad'd" too. What an awful ad.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago*

    I feel like what they did to the person on the left is just as bad, she got replaced, but by another Asian woman, with "better features" or whatever the prompt said to do

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    What I really don't get in particular, is that if you wanted to sell me on studying at Stanford, the original picture would be so much better. That looks like a friend group I'd like to hang out with.

    Whereas the AI-generated picture just looks dead-eyed, like some models you hired to smile into the camera and then never talk to each other again. Honestly, it does not even register as people to me and not just because they literally do not exist.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think colleges should be required to state when images are altered or do not represent actual students or locations. They should proudly show real goddamn people and places!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    All marketing should.

    Any AI use disclosed, and the level it was used. Did it generate the entire photo? Did it replace people or objects in the photo? Was it used to change the setting?

    If that info is not included on the advertisement itself, like a QR code linking to a site, that info must be available for at least 1 year after the advertising/marketing ends.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Least problematic but most perplexing: they took away the middle guy’s headphones. WTF is wrong with headphones?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    What could be more important than cheating and misleading to achieve diversity? They do good work for tech companies too, "we totally have a 50/50 male/female ratio, just look at our company picnic!"

  • source