A coalition of state attorneys general led by California's Rob Bonta reportedly reached a deal on Monday to let Paramount's acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery proceed, an outcome that press freedom advocates and antitrust campaigners condemned as a disaster for journalism, entertainment industry workers, and American democracy.

The deal, which is set to be formally announced later Monday, will pave the way for the creation of one of the largest media conglomerates in the world, helmed by the son of a billionaire megadonor to President Donald Trump and the Republican Party.

If the merger is finalized, the resulting media behemoth would control nearly 30% of both wide-release theatrical film distribution and basic cable channel licensing in the US. The combination would also put CNN under Ellison's control, heightening press freedom concerns that have intensified since Paramount's takeover of CBS.

"The AGs’ capitulation marks a new low."

“Today, billionaires have yet again bribed, censored, and bullied their way to the top,” Alvaro Bedoya, senior adviser at the American Economic Liberties Project, said in a statement. “As a result, a billionaire media conglomerate closely allied with the president will soon own one of its closest rivals, including some of the nation’s most critical news outlets. Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund will co-own those outlets, too.”

Bedoya criticized Bonta and California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, who privately pushed the state attorney general's office to settle the lawsuit out of court. Xavier Becerra, the frontrunner to succeed Newsom, also called for a settlement, citing Paramount's threat to leave California if its proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. was blocked.

“People want champions who are not afraid of rich bullies. Newsom, Becerra, and Bonta did not meet that mark," said Bedoya. "The people who work in the film and TV industry and the small businesses who support it will suffer as a result. And so will everyone who values dissent in our democracy.”

Jessica González, co-CEO of the advocacy group Free Press, also denounced Bonta for reneging on "his promise to enforce the law and protect consumers and workers."

"Hundreds of thousands of people called on our state AGs to stand up to the Ellisons, who have engaged in a campaign of corruption and extortion to pave the way for this unlawful merger. We can no longer rely on the federal government to enforce the law and protect regular people. That much is clear. But the AGs’ capitulation marks a new low. It’s a sad day for all of us who have been opposing this merger because it will cut jobs and raise prices, all as it consolidates the media even more to enable authoritarians."

Actor Mark Ruffalo, an outspoken opponent of the merger who was subjected to what critics called a corporate "smear campaign" because of his stance, trained his ire on California's governor in response to news of the settlement.

"Gavin Newsom hands huge win to Trump and his billionaire cronies," Ruffalo wrote on social media.

The trial was scheduled to begin in March of next year. In its original lawsuit against the proposed merger—filed shortly after the Trump Justice Department dropped its investigation of the proposed purchase—the coalition of 12 attorneys general warned the deal would "combine two of Hollywood’s five major film distributors and two of the five major basic cable channel owners, extinguishing competition between Paramount and Warner Bros. and inflicting substantial harm on movie theaters, basic cable distributors and, ultimately, audiences nationwide."

The settlement deal reached Monday also reportedly includes the lawsuit filed by the Writers Guild of America, which represents TV screenwriters and others in the entertainment industry.

Bloomberg reported that the attorneys general of New York, Connecticut, and other states that had pushed back during settlement talks were able to secure "independent editorial boards for CBS and CNN as part of the deal"—though it's unclear how such boards would function.

"The terms are said to include a financial penalty if the company fails to make good on a promise to distribute 30 films per year in theaters," Bloomberg added.

This news is deeply disappointing and a massive betrayal of everyday workers and small businesses.

David Ellison is willing to make big promises, like 30 films a year, because he knows he doesn't actually have to stand by it.

We've seen it before with past mergers: Promises… https://t.co/yAYXusKiRM
— American Economic Liberties Project (@econliberties) September 21, 2026

The Los Angeles Times noted that Paramount's purchase of Warner Bros. "will be heavily leveraged."

"The company’s bankers have lined up nearly $80 billion in debt to finance the merger. [Paramount CEO David] Ellison’s father, billionaire Larry Ellison, late last year agreed to backstop the $47-billion in equity needed to complete the acquisition. Royal families from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Abu Dhabi have agreed to chip in $24 billion for an equity stake by assuming some of Ellison’s financial commitments."

González of Free Press warned Monday that "consolidating the media in the hands of friendly oligarchs is right out of the authoritarian playbook."

“What’s exceedingly clear is that our laws and our political system are not strong enough to resist the pressure and manipulation of corrupt billionaires," said González. "We need to strengthen democratic systems of government, including getting money out of politics, and pass laws that break up big media conglomerates. We need to ensure that a few billionaires can’t drown out the masses to dictate bad policy.”


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
31 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 75 points 1 month ago (4 children)

“Gavin Newsom hands huge win to Trump and his billionaire cronies,” Ruffalo wrote on social media.

That's his secret Mark, Gavin Newsom is always selling out the public to benefit billionaires...

It's why he's so dangerous, the billionaires are going to push the shit out of him for the 2028 dem primary. Even if he loses the general, they still win. And if he does manage to win, he names the DNC chair and hands it back to neoliberals.

Nothing is more important than making sure a progressive wins the Dem primary. Even if Republicans win the general, the voting members would be likely to pick another unbiased chair. But if a Dem becomes president, they name the chair. That's why the last one just handed it to Kamala, and she'd have handed Jamie Harrison the chair again.

We can't waste this opportunity.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Which is why we need to start sowing the seeds for a progressive primary candidate now. We need to be vetting them like any one of them could be the next Fetterman or Platner and we better be getting their names out there before the race kicks off, because if we cannot afford to wait until the race starts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 78 points 1 month ago

    Once again: ‘28 Democratic primary voters, if he does this to us, he’ll do it to you.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Oh boy I can’t wait to vote for this asshole and be told I’m the jerk for being mad about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Reminder: The time to act to support progressives is before the primaries start. At each level of voting, obviously vote for the best option. if it comes to the general and it's Newsom or a fascist, the choice seems clear to me.

    But for anyone ONLY participating in the process when the general election happens: those people are part of the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This ain’t my first rodeo, kid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I can't vote in the primaries because I'm not registered Democrat or Republican.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago

    Actor Mark Ruffalo, an outspoken opponent of the merger who was subjected to what critics called a corporate “smear campaign” because of his stance, trained his ire on California’s governor in response to news of the settlement.

    “Gavin Newsom hands huge win to Trump and his billionaire cronies,” Ruffalo wrote on social media.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Newsom is an actually shit candidate. His funny tweets at Trump don't change how greedy and shitty he is.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Shouldn't have caved to Ellison

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    What's keeping people from boycotting the fuck out of this company?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Basically swearing off film and TV. After the merger roughly half of these will be controlled by Ellison. The other half will be Disney and while they're not friends of Trump they're still unapologetically capitalist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago

    consider streaming & checking out physical media from your local public library, they have plenty of watchable material on apps such as Hoopla & Kanopy for free.

    considering purchasing an inexpensive DVD player.

    abandon the dream of endless blissful corporate streaming & your ass will follow!

    (cut the cord from the oligarchs’ media stranglehold if you dare)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Initially I didn't know too much about Newsom except some people somewhat passionately disliked the guy. After he shoved the age verification law (a national login system wearing sheep's clothing) through I started getting an idea why.

    Disclaimer! Take everything below with a grain of salt as I haven't spent time to completely verify it all.

    Newsom has also held a series of partially questionable stances on issues that paints a very stark picture.

    Newsom came out against the billionaire tax arguing it should be a national issue. Sure but keep in mind we haven't raised the minimum wage since 2009 ($7.20/hour) and even when Democrats held everything, they didn't pass a single payer healthcare, raise wages, or protect women's rights.

    The excuse of Paramount threatening to leave is kinda crap. The studio sound stages and the industry built up around them is difficult to just uproot. But that said there are a few mini "holly woods" starting to really mature around the world that are a lot cheaper than LA.

    Another more subtle point is that one of the easier take away from Reagan and now Trump is that people vote for candidates who confidently promise to do something. By the time people figure out they've been duped, with both of these presidents we somehow ended up entangled with Iran. With Newsom he could do the "right" thing and stop a third of the US media industry being owned by an antidemocratic billionaire but then he would be blamed when the billionaires gang up to punish him by using him as a scapegoat for fuckery they were going to do anyway. Please remember to factor in that a big chunk of the USA voted for Trump, even if it can be proven that he did in fact steal votes in the swing states, he still got most of his victims to vote for him.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    You mean he hates Trans AND Loves Billionaire-Run Monopolies? He's got MY Vote!

    -Blue No Matter Who!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    A promise of 30 movies a year is meaningless when there's no guarantee of quality. What theater will appreciate showing 30 movies that no one wants to see because they're clearly terrible?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    He also a few days ago vetoed telework protections for us state workers and his admin has refused to negotiate in good faith with our union, we're voting on a strike right now. Fuck this guy and fuck any of the progressive outlets Pakman Show and Meidas Touch who keep platforming him.

  • source
  • What? Where was the furry?

  • source