top 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 141 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I bet this dude just wants that cave all to himself.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 1 month ago (1 child)
    [–] 17 points 1 month ago* (9 children)

    This place is a message... and part of a system of messages... pay attention to it!

    Sending this message was important to us. We considered ourselves to be a powerful culture.

    This place is not a place of honor... no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here... nothing valued is here.

    What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us. This message is a warning about danger.

    The danger is in a particular location... it increases towards a center... the center of danger is here... of a particular size and shape, and below us.

    The danger is still present, in your time, as it was in ours.

    The danger is to the body, and it can kill.

    The form of the danger is an emanation of energy.

    The danger is unleashed only if you substantially disturb this place physically. This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_nuclear_waste_warning_messages

    Warning! This is an excellent rabbithole.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The problem is, every warning or piece of hostile architecture reads like a challenge to any colonists that come after us.

    The pyramids were believed to contain dangerous curses, and there were warnings against opening the tombs of the pharaohs, but that didn’t stop people cracking open those sealed boxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    This place ______ a place of honor______ highly esteemed deed __ commemorated ________ valued is here.

    Sign is a little worn but we have translated what we can. Those other pictures are probably just some silly Ancient American curse. They worshiped child fuckers so no reason to take them seriously.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It's really just a bunch of naval gazing.

    Just carve a bunch of skulls around the entrance and call it a day.

    Ok so you've warned future people about nuclear waste, now are we going to get to work on warning future people about poisonous fruits, poisonous fish, volcanoes, etc? No? Why not? Won't those kill more future people than a few idiots that decide to go exploring a cave with a bunch of skull images out front? Once a few people die from going into the skull cave, the rest of the tribe know not to go there.

    We can't keep 100% of future idiots safe from everything. Why would people be so obsessed over trying to make people safe from this one particular thing when there would be hundreds of dangers a primitive tribe would have to deal with constantly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    My boss, who's favorite thing in the world is Claude:

    guy rubbing his hands looking excited for the butthole cave

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    For those privileged enough to not get this joke:

    the claude logo is a butthole

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Did they copy it? That's super weird

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    But in all seriousness, the idea is to make the place of the final nuclear waste disposal unattractive to curious humans of the future 10'000 years.
    So why not somewhere that is naturally unattractive and stays so for a few million years? Like, a never changing extreme desert? Antarctica? A deep sea trench?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It also needs to be somewhere geologically stable. You really don't want erosion cracking open the storage. That limits the options.

    It's also worth noting that habitability can change remarkably rapidly. E.g. the Sahara went through a green period. It ended about 5000 years ago. The reverse can also happen.

    The mindset being used is also layered defense. We need to make it simultaneously understandable, boring and off-putting. Putting it somewhere inaccessible also helps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Serious answer would be drawings. We can read cave drawings from 10k yrs ago.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I fear that won't stop the FBI.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    What if the future society is based on the FBI?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Turns out that solution selects for a particular type of explorer, but nobody minds.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    here ya go❀️

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    sudden downturn in population of teenage boys tho

  • source