Marcy Kaptur For Congress

Erin In The Morning is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.

In recent weeks, controversy has been roiling the Democratic Party over how to handle Democrats who have taken an anti-transgender turn. Some have tried to use weak and wishy-washy language toward transgender people, like James Talarico in Texas, who said he opposes transgender girls competing in girls' sports "if it endangers safety or fairness." Others have taken harder-line stances, like Josh Turek, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Iowa, who announced that he does not believe "biological males" should play women's sports and whose campaign said he opposes "taxpayer-funded sex changes." Today, however, brought what may be the most extreme anti-trans statement by a Democrat running for Congress in recent memory. Marcy Kaptur has released an ad announcing her support for anti-trans sports and school policies and casting transgender existence as an "ideology."

"My opponent won't talk about all that. He'd rather lie about my record. Here's the truth. I voted with Republicans to keep transgender ideology out of our schools, because parents know what's best for their kids. And boys should not play in girls' sports. Don't let them change the subject. I'm Marcy Kaptur, and I approve this message because I'm focused on making your life more affordable," says the ad, released today.

See the full ad here:

Marcy Kaptur is running for reelection in Ohio's 9th Congressional District, covering Toledo and Northwest Ohio. At 80 years old, she is the longest-serving woman in congressional history, having been in Congress since 1983. She now becomes the Democrat with the most vehemently anti-transgender advertisement in a year in which a small but significant number of statewide and congressional Democratic candidates are capitulating on transgender issues, and, to EITM's knowledge, is the first major Democratic candidate to use the term "transgender ideology," a term popularized by Republicans and the anti-trans movement to cast a transgender person's identity as an extreme belief system rather than a sincere statement of fact.

EITM first alerted readers to Kaptur's anti-trans turn back in May. On May 20, the U.S. House passed H.R. 2616, the "Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act," by a vote of 217-198. Eight House Democrats voted for it. Though it has not passed the Senate, if a bill like it ever did, it would hand the Trump administration enormous leverage to strip funding from any school that let transgender students use the bathroom matching their gender or be called by their chosen name and pronouns. The bill specifically states that schools would lose funding for "teach[ing] or advanc[ing] concepts related to gender ideology." At its most basic level, even acknowledging that transgender people exist could be considered "advancing concepts." It was one of the most extreme anti-transgender bills any significant number of Democrats have ever voted for, though importantly, the vast majority of Democrats opposed it.

Kaptur's move comes as other Democrats have also taken harmful stances toward transgender people during this election. Earlier this month, Turek announced opposition to "taxpayer-funded sex changes" through his campaign, which would presumably include Medicare and Medicaid. Ohio's Democratic nominee for governor, Amy Acton, called transgender girls "boys" and announced her support for sports bans. Meanwhile, Iowa's Democratic nominee for governor, Rob Sand, was confronted at a rally over his own remarks. Now Kaptur takes the lead as the Democrat with the most hateful framing toward transgender people.

As these races continue, these anti-transgender stances have not spared any of these Democrats from further anti-trans advertisements. Elon Musk announced an ad blitz of up to $100 million, with most of the ads targeting transgender people, and the candidates it targets include some of the very same Democrats releasing anti-trans ads. Transgender constituents in this district are now stuck between a rock and a hard place, left wondering what the point of their vote is if both candidates view them as disposable and subhuman.

Erin In The Morning is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


From Erin In The Morning via This RSS Feed.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 1 month ago

I sure do love being a political pawn. No politician has ever asked me how I feel about this, and whether my voice should be heard in regards to my treatment.

  • source
  • 19 comments in c/transgender@piefed.blahaj.zone view that post
    [–] 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Calling someone's existence an ideology is as dehumanising as it gets.

    💯 2
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    «MAGA» «Republicans» «GOP» «nonces» «Epstein class» «Conservatives» it's extremely easy to dehumanize & generalize. But it's indeed easier to blame others for their own inhumanity. She knows she’s a ghoul, this is why she is pushing antibiology in their indoctrination centers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    I would argue that at the very least, the terms maga, Republicans and GOP and conservatives are not dehumanizing as they call themselves that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    At 80 years old, she is the longest-serving woman in congressional history, having been in Congress since 1983.>

    what is going on, ohio? fucking retire already, transphobe.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    Saw the best line somewhere today "Anti-trans Dems should be called 'Biological Republicans'" and that definitely seems apt here.

    🤣 1
  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yet another data point to show that Congress should have an age limit. Because all we have are 80+ year olds deciding how the country is operating based on their backwards ass 3+ generation old ideals that they will never live to see the consequences of.

    Congress should have mandatory retirement at whatever age full social security is available. That's the age that Congress determined people should be moving out of the workforce, they should have to do the same.

    The country needs to be run by people that actually can keep up with what's going on. That can use email, for fuck's sake.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    If they were around during segregation they have no place in government. Octogenarians and older should be prohibited from voting. They get dementia and start calling people racial slurs, and in cases specific to Germany, old nans start throwing up sieg heils and HH's.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago*

    "Should we go after the child-rapist? or the fascists who are kidnapping people? or the companies who are lying, cheating, stealing, and destroying the environment? or the people who are torturing others? or the people who want to bomb kids?

    No! We should go after the people who think that they should get to decide what happens to their own bodies!"

    • Democratic politicians
  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I still cannot get anyone IRL to define “LGBTQ agenda”, or now “transgender ideology”. It’s simple: they don’t know. All they know is that the thing they cannot even describe is taking over schools, colleges, and universities.

    Why would I know about that stuff??

    Something a coworker said to me recently. I then told him that I cannot discuss politics with someone who debates in ignorance. He couldn’t handle that, and walked away.

    Why does education, especially higher-ed, skew liberal? Simple. They encourage critical thought. And when critical thought is applied to identity politics and domestic and foreign policy, empathy tends to creep in—that and reasoning with facts and figures. And we all know that conservatives operate on feelings and emotional arguments. These sorts of things cannot be reasoned with.

    Example:

    Fact: Crime is lower than it was in the past, as indicated by the feds.

    Feeling: Doesn’t matter, because I see stories about crime every day, especially committed by those people.

    Fact: Communities and education has become more tolerant and accepting of sexual and gender minorities, which has encouraged more kids to express themselves and has improved mental health outcomes.

    Feeling: That’s the democrats pushing their lifestyle on our kids, confusing them with anti-Christian bias.

    Fact: Vaccines have reduced the prevalence of certain diseases and infections to all time lows.

    Feeling: I don’t see anyone getting these diseases anymore, and I heard that vaccines can cause injury and autism. Why are they pushing for such aggressive schedules of shots? And why is the government mandating them in order for my kid to go to school?

  • source
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 month ago

    What a transphobic hag.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Get octogenarian ideology out of our government

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    We have snakes among us in our party.

    Fuck corporate establishment Dems

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Clown got hoodwinked.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    80? She's got one foot in the grave. Pack it up, Marcy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    You're not going to get Republican or Democrat votes doig that, Marcy

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    LOL, so what are the options? This, an even worse Republican, a potato?

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] [S] 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    And still these people will tell us to vote blue no matter who.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Who are you going to vote for? I seriously hope it's not Jill Stein.

    Nvm you're not even American lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments