California Gov. Gavin Newsom does not like being on Donald Trump’s side on any issue.

But when it comes to transgender girls and women in sports, particularly at the school level, the Democrat said he largely agrees with the Republican president. Newsom, one of his party’s leading White House prospects, believes it’s “deeply unfair” for people who are assigned male at birth to compete against girls.

While most Democratic officials remain steadfast supporters of the transgender community, an increasing number in red and blue states are distancing themselves from their party’s unflinching support for the transgender community’s policy priorities, such as allowing athletes to compete on teams that match their gender identity. The shift follows years of conservative attacks against Democrats on the divisive issue, which affects a relatively small number of transgender people and their families, but has emerged as one of Republicans’ most potent political weapons in the Trump era.

A political group backed by billionaire Trump ally Elon Musk has begun running digital ads targeting Democrats in key Senate races in Texas, Ohio and Alaska, accusing them of allowing men to compete in women’s sports.

Talarico began to distance himself from those positions months ago. He went further in a Fox News interview last week, saying he would vote in favor of a national ban for gender-affirming surgeries for transgender minors, which are rare.

In Iowa, State Auditor Rob Sand, the Democratic Party’s nominee for governor, has spoken out against transgender athletes competing in women’s sports as a matter of fairness. Ohio Democratic gubernatorial nominee Amy Acton has taken a similar position, although she has drawn criticism from the left for adopting Trump’s language after saying she opposed “boys playing in girls’ sports.”

in deep-blue Massachusetts, transgender rights became a defining campaign issue during the state’s recent Democratic U.S. Senate primary, illustrating the potential backlash that party members can face.

Sen. Ed Markey, 80, secured the nomination and later credited his win to not shying away from advocating for transgender rights. He used the issue to attack his Democratic opponent, Rep. Seth Moulton, who had said he wouldn’t want his daughters to play against transgender athletes.

A June poll from Quinnipiac University found that about 7 in 10 registered voters think that transgender women and girls should not be allowed to play on women’s and girls’ sports teams. About one-quarter think they should. Democrats are divided, with about half saying transgender women and girls should be allowed and about half saying they should not.

A Pew Research Center poll conducted last year found that just over half, 55%, of Democrats would be “not too” or “not at all” comfortable with athletes playing on teams that don’t match their sex at birth, while 21% said they were “somewhat” comfortable and only 23% said they were “extremely” or “very” comfortable with this.

The political debate is evolving as transgender people increasingly become the target of conservative backlash through state laws and the Trump administration.

Sports participation has become one of the main fronts in a political battle over transgender rights, although most Republican-controlled states have also implemented policies that affect a bigger slice of the population. There are bans on some gender-affirming health care for transgender young people and rules barring transgender people from using the bathrooms that match their gender identity in schools and occasionally other public places.

At least 25 states are now enforcing laws or policies banning transgender women and girls from competing in at least some women’s and girls’ sports and three others have adopted laws but have enforcement blocked by the courts.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws barring transgender girls from school teams.

Transgender athletes make up a small portion of team rosters. NCAA president Charlie Baker testified in 2024 that he knew of fewer than 10 transgender college student-athletes out of more than 500,000 total.

Newsom, who is considered a frontrunner in the shadow primary, highlighted his long record of supporting LGBTQ+ priorities, including sanctioning same-sex marriage as the San Francisco mayor decades ago and later appointing the first trans judge in California history.

But in sports, he thinks it’s unfair to allow people assigned as males at birth to compete against girls.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, another likely Democratic presidential contender, has taken the opposite position.

He has consistently criticized state-level bans and restrictions on transgender athletes, calling them “bullying” and a “setback for equality.” Following the recent Supreme Court ruling that upheld state bans on transgender athletes, Pritzker, whose cousin is transgender, reaffirmed his position on social media.

In Pennsylvania, Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro opposes bans on transgender athletes in school sports, which he’s called cruel and designed to discriminate. He argues that athletic participation and eligibility should not be dictated by politicians, but rather handled by local athletic organizations — a stance in line with several LGBTQ+ groups.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Opportunist politicians whining hard about a non-existent problem instead of talks of lowering bills they attack trans participation in sports.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 10 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 33 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    How common of an issue is transgender in sports actually?

    This seems like one of those distractions from the Epstein files I keep hearing about

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    In actual sports?

    .002% (10/500,000) of US college athletes

    In the minds of Idiot America?

    It's very much an outsized concern. 73% of Americans were uncomfortable with transgender athletes competing on sports teams that do not match their sex at birth. and even in the Democratic party,

    Democrats are more divided on the issue. A slim majority (55%) said they would be not too or not at all comfortable with athletes playing on teams that do not match their birth sex, while smaller shares said they would be somewhat comfortable (21%) or extremely or very comfortable (23%).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Despite there being statistically few transgender athletes, unjustly barring them from sports cements a perception that it's also acceptable (and under the current administration, encouraged) to discriminate against them across society as a whole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    It's more about an extension of the world view of the people in the Epstein files.

    It is the very people in those files that spent decades polling and focus group testing a successful message they could have to attack trans people. The "bathroom" attacks being a failed trial of attack method. But more broadly, using the attack on trans woman specifically to attack woman and children in general.

    That is why the entire issue of trans rights is being reduced down to trans girls in high school sports teams.

    They don't give a shit about girls high school sports. Unless you are a parent of a trans kid or a trans kid yourself then YOU should not give a shit about it either.

    This is nothing more than a bunch of pedophiles that want to see your kids genitals. It is a defense of patriarchy that is lashing out at the ideas of gender roles and the second class status of woman in society.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Believe it or not, the better stance than sucking up to fascists and surrendering to trans annihilation is to literally not even talk about the trans community at all. Its better to not even engage in the conversation than to call for their annihilation.

    These mother fuckers already wanted to kill off trans people. Appealing to fascists is just an excuse. They themselves are fascists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)
  • Yep, best to just say fuck all the trans people, it's a big tent and you're not in it. Sorry charlie, should have been born right. The big tent says trans bad, after all. Best to cater to the lies people have been fed about us. Vote blue no matter who!

    Once trans people are banned from sports up to and including chess for their obvious (read: unproven) advantages and children are denied medically necessary healthcare, everyone will surely just let us live happily from there.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    You can tell inauthentic the Democratic party establishment is by looking at this issue alone. Simply by comparing how someone like Gavin Newsome can't even reach the same obvious and human conclusion that a right wing Utah Republican did when actually forced to be met with making a decision.

    Finally, there is one more important reason for this veto. I must admit, I am not an expert on transgenderism. I struggle to understand so much of it and the science is conflicting. When in doubt however, I always try to err on the side of kindness, mercy and compassion. I also try to get proximate and I am learning so much from our transgender community. They are great kids who face enormous struggles. Here are the numbers that have most impacted my decision: 75,000, 4, 1, 86 and 56.

    75,000 high school kids participating in high school sports in Utah. 4 transgender kids playing high school sports in Utah. 1 transgender student playing girls sports. 86% of trans youth reporting suicidality. 56% of trans youth having attempted suicide. Four kids and only one of them playing girls sports. That’s what all of this is about. Four kids who aren’t dominating or winning trophies or taking scholarships. Four kids who are just trying to find some friends and feel like they are a part of something. Four kids trying to get through each day. Rarely has so much fear and anger been directed at so few. I don’t understand what they are going through or why they feel the way they do. But I want them to live. And all the research shows that even a little acceptance and connection can reduce suicidality significantly. For that reason, as much as any other, I have taken this action in the hope that we can continue to work together and find a better way. If a veto override occurs, I hope we can work to find ways to show these four kids that we love them and they have a place in our state.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    How to increase your chance of losing

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You started that summary in a very weird place.

    Full sentence for context:

    "California Gov. Gavin Newsom does not like being on Donald Trump’s side on any issue."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Fucking americans bulling vulnerable minorities again, then they pretend to be "good people" internationally 🤢

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    “Recalibrating”? Or “triangulating”? Or “third-waying”?

  • source