top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 208 points 2 months ago (12 children)

I had to look it up, the striped building with the dome is from Epstein's Island.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Oh thank you! I was like, was a local mosque destroyed but everyone was too antimuslim to report it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    No, but after 9/11 New Yorkers freaked out and worked to block a mosque Islamic community center from being built. Donald Trump was at the center of the effort.

    Eventually the effort succeeded, and the organization trying to build the center was pressured to sell the property.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -36 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Funny how it's fully jewish architecture

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago

    Dome of the rock was built by Christian workers from Constantinople* and ordered to be constructed by muslims, if that is what you are refering too.

    *Allegedly, S. Runciman history of the crusades, as i recall.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 172 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    How did WTC7 burn and collapse when the only thing that hit it that day was a massive skyscraper? 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Concrete rubble can't melt steel beams

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Actually... enough concrete falling at once creates an enormous amount of heat, maybe enough to weaken steel and lower its max capacity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    nice try thermcel but everyone knows you can't create energy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I thought the Building 7 shit was compelling until I looked up how that building was actually built. Now, I’m surprised it lasted as long as it did

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago*

    kinda odd that there was a shadow commision, and that Ghislaine Maxwell was invited to it huh...

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    never forgetti september eletti

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    maybe I overlooked it, but the FBI article conveniently "forgot" to mention that

    Emad Salem, an FBI informant and a key witness in the trial of Yousef, Abdul Hakim Murad, and Wali Khan Amin Shah, stated that the bomb itself was built under supervision from the FBI.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 2 months ago (20 children)

    It collapsed because it was on fire all day

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 127 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Bullshit. Don't lie to me. You think "fire" can just "burn" a building and it will collapse because "gravity"? I bet you believe in other fairy tales too, like public healthcare and the moon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If the moon isn't real, where does all the cheese come from? Checkmate conspiracy theorists!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    Do You believe in cheese? "Cheese" is an edible polymer developed by DuPont in the 50s. Do you believe that the government holds tons of cheese in caves in Missouri? Those are obviously the location of the soundstages used to film the lunar landings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    There was a kid in my class for aviation maintenance who was a genuine flat earther. If you ever pressed him on it he would say "what do you know, you probably think we landed on the moon!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    If the moon was real then how come nobody talked about it before stanley Kubrick made 2001 a space odyssey?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It was also smacked by debris from the falling tower that ended up damaging several support trusses and simultaneously igniting like a dozen floors on fire at the same time. Tbh it's kinda amazing the building lasted as long as it did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The University of Alaska Fairbanks did a report that concluded that the fire didn't lead to the collapse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Theres been so many studies by incredibly reputable people. They aren't going to believe no matter how much is said. At this point they're worse than the maga people. Their believing in the lie has cost millions of deaths in the middle east through global imperialism. They dont want that blood on their hands and its finally gone into a war with Iran that will never end. The people who you are asking to tell you the truth wouldnt even tell you that the building was so full of hazardous building materials that it was going to give untold amounts of people cancer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

    Just follow the money, there's documented evidence of unusual pre-9/11 trading that profited from short bets.

    Allen Poteshman's peer-reviewed study in The Journal of Business (2006) concluded: "there is evidence of unusual option market activity in the days leading up to September 11 that is consistent with investors trading on advance knowledge of the attacks."

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    You cant post anything that slightly resembles 9/11 conspiracy on this site without a slew of downvotes. I made a post just asking if people believed the official story and got verbatim some of the same comments and a slew of downvotes. Presuming they're not with other malicious motives, I think they're just close minded dicks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You'll have to forgive us close minded fucks, we've been listening to people spew uninformed shit about jet fuel and steel beams for 25 years and we're kinda tired.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Go ahead and keep believing everything the government tells you, I'm sure that will work out great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I don't believe most of what the government said. I also don't think that tower 7 was some sort of inside job. I simply don't believe the finance bros and the government are capable of keeping these things secret

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    People here started again about building 7.

    Which had the roof of the north tower fall right on top of it, that piece of tower was a about the same size as building 7.

    Weird how it "collapsed and burned to the ground". Must be a conspiracy.

    It's still entertaining to read tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    What happened with wtc 7? I dont have the deep lore

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    It was "pulled" (audio recording of him calling it) by Zionist WTC owner Larry Silverstein, with announcement of its destruction press release read on TV with WTC 7 visibly still standing in background image. Most experts believe the operation would need several days of preparation instead of the few hours that took place until a bit past 5pm the same day, and because of this, Silverstein's $1B asbestos problem that 9/11 solved, could have provided a "backup solution" for the 2 main towers melting beams from jet fuel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I used to think that it was a hoax because of WTC7 but I did something that people don't usually do: challenge my own views and yeah, it was burning for the entire time + rubble hitting it. The steel bar exceeded the containment of concrete causing a structural collapse

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Yeah fair fucks to you. I have only one rule for people I keep close to me in my life: I don't mind if you're a cunt to me occasionally, because we're all a cunt occasionally, as long as you go off and reflect on it and good job, you reflected on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    There's footage of it, it literally isn't simultaneous on all sides lmfao. It slumps inward on one side, then a facade collapses, then the rest of it comes down following the already collapsed sides

    You can literally just watch video footage lmfao

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Alright now try justifying the Epstein conspiracy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Also, forget about the massive amount of puts that were purchased against the only two airlines involved in the hijackings just days before the attack.

    Oh, and forget about the fact that the building owner profited $300 million by purchasing an exorbitant insurance package after buying the building only nine months before.

    Also, definitely forget that Building 7 and the section of the Pentagon that was targeted were housing all the personnel and evidence involved in the biggest financial crimes investigation of the century.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    biggest financial crimes investigation of the century.

    Oh come on, even if that were true we've had the panama papers and literally nothing happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Oh and don't forget to forget that a large number of agencies that were the ones to deal with that emergency just so happened to be wargaming something very close to the unprecedented event that actually happened that same day: dealing with a terrorist attack that uses airplanes as missiles and flies them into buildings.

    NORAD was one of them. Iirc NY firefighters were another.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    It's both hilarious and disturbing that, 25 years later, we still have a significant number of people believing controlled demolition took down the WTC towers and building 7. But then again, it's been nearly 70 years since the JFK assassination and most people still think Oswald was a patsy 🤷‍

    Conspiracism is like gossip, but on a national level. It's pure poison. It can lead to anything ranging from destroyed personal relationship and reputations, to the Holocaust (think of the shit said about Jews for centuries leading up to it). We shouldn't be so blasé about that shit.

    And the Epstein case had something 9/11 truth doesn't: evidence, court-worthy and verifiable evidence. Prosecutable evidence. Undeniable evidence. Show me a bomb-planter who did 9/11 and the paycheque he received for his work from Dubya, and then we can talk. Otherwise, all you have is gossip.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I mean is it a coincidence that prior his assassination, Kennedy was trying to derail Israel’s nuclear program? A case could be made to suggest that Israel helped plot the assassination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Dubya wasn’t behind it. Who in the heck ever said that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The official story has a few questionable things...

    The Pentagon is definitely sus.. not only the destruction doesn't look like a plane hit it... But also how rumsfeld a few days prior talked about missing trillions of dollars

    Building 7... Larry Silverstein talking about "pulling" the building..(never mind his incredible timing on insuring the towers against a terrorist attack.

    George Bush talked about how he watched the first plane hit the building on TV and he thought what a terrible pilot... But he didn't have much time to think about it as he had to go talk to some kids in grade school

    There's a lot more I could go on but I won't

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This thread is impossible. The amount of people posting sarcastically without denoting it and the amount of people sincerely posting conspiracy theories (believable theories and dumb theories that belie a lack of understanding physics) appear in almost equal measure.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Lemmy. Where you get bunch of redditors who were banned for being socially unacceptable, and then bunch of redditors who left it for moral reasons, and then bunch of redditors who left because their favourite client stopped working.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Harry lutnick is connected to 9/11

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›