As someone who likes both Cartoons and Anime equally, I have yet to find someone who doesn't get offended by me saying that. They're just animated projects at the end of the day, just made differently through cultural norms. I'll enjoy both like I'll enjoy a burger & ramen, both are good and tasty, don't care which one's better as long I'm munching down

That's it, I'm just writing this because I'm bored

top 84 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 2 months ago (29 children)

Anime is just a specific subset of cartoon. 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [+] -20 points 2 months ago (28 children)

    I think it depends on the topic being animated. It needs to be for satire, caricature, or humor.

    Anime horror is not a cartoon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (21 children)

    How the fuck is anime horror not a cartoon? It's the same type of media, that being drawn animation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 2 months ago (20 children)

    Because for a cartoon the topic needs to be satire, caricature, or humor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (19 children)

    Finish reading that sentence:

    The specific meaning has evolved, but the modern usage usually refers to either: an image or series of images intended satire, caricature, or humor; or a motion picture that relies on a sequence of illustrations for its animation

    All anime is cartoon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago (18 children)

    A scanner darkly relies on a sequence of illustrations for its animation, but it is not a cartoon.

    Every frame of Loving Vincent is an oil painting and would not be considered a cartoon.

    Waltz with Bashir would not be called a cartoon even though the drawn style matches popular cartoons.

    A counterexample of your final claim. Grave of the Fireflies is an anime about children during World War II. It is not a cartoon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    "Cartoon" isn't a genre, it's a technique. All of the films you've listed are cartoons. Because, by definition, they're a series of illustrations. Animation = cartoon = anime.

    How you feel about the subject matter is irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    None of the films listed are cartoons, because none are satire, caricature, or created for humor.

    I agree my feelings are irrelevant. I'm quoting Wikipedia

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    a motion picture that relies on a sequence of illustrations for its animation

    You really ought to read the links you post

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Yes, Cartoons rely on a sequence of illustrations for their animation.

    No, not all motion picture that rely on a sequence of illustrations for its animation are cartoons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    The semi-colon indicates a related thought. The or after the semi-colon indicates it is a discrete element. Either part of the sentence is correct, just not complete. So yes, given that English is not static, a motion picture created with a sequence of illustrations is a cartoon, as per Wikipedia. The topic of the animation is not relevant to that part of the statement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

    The creators of Loving Vincent would be offended at their work being called a cartoon.

    It certainly isn't described as a cartoon. Take a look at the wiki describingLoving Vincent.

    This counter example is sufficient to prove my point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You seem very firm on the idea of cartoon not meaning animated video. I don't think any one person or group is in charge of what words mean in English, but I'm certain it isn't you, or the makers of Loving Vincent, for that matter. Even the Wikipedia article you referenced doesn't agree with you, which I can only assume you accept since you're now going with the stance of "Cartoons can't be fine art. This is fine art, so it can't be a cartoon." I reject both elements of that statement.

    Ultimately, your whole argument has been a series of appeals to authority, but merely as a defense of your opinion since you will change authorities if they don't agree with you. This makes you the authority in your appeal to authority. I'm not a child and you're not my parent. You also aren't my boss. Why do you think your authority, a random stranger on the internet, would matter to me, another random stranger on the internet?

    All that said, this is your opinion, and everyone is entitled to their opinion, even when they're wrong. Just don't expect everyone else to agree with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Even the Wikipedia article you referenced doesn't agree with you,

    It shows cartoons are satire, caricature, or humor, and can be animated.

    Animated images that are not satire, caricature, or humor, are not cartoons.

    Moving from fine art to engineering. A gif of how an engine functions is not a cartoon. Not all animated images are cartoons.

    your whole argument has been a series of appeals to authority

    No. My argument is proof by counter example. I give many examples where moving images are not cartoons. My other approach is linguistic. In many languages the phrase is animated design, and the cartoon reference stems from the funny pages of a newspaper.

    The American "cartoon" banket usage is down to the low cultural impact of foreign media and overdisneyfication.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Okay, you're reading comprehension is failing. I'm not even getting into that. I'm sorry that you don't grasp how commas, semi-colons, and the word or work in a sentence.

    Now, who says those things aren't cartoons? You? Everyone? People who don't speak English as a first language and therefore imply nuance that native speakers don't? And right or wrong, there are a number of dialects in the English language. Does a flat refer to a tire or a place people live? Which definition is wrong? Is it possible the answer is neither?

    What does the word gay, or coke, mean? Is that today's definition? How about 100 years ago? 200 years ago? Do you think the definition for the word cartoon can't or hasn't changed? Why do you think your opinion on that has any bearing on the fact of it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago

    Now, who says those things aren't cartoons?

    Engineers, film makers, critics

    You?

    Yes

    Everyone?

    Well, obviously not you.

    People who don't speak English as a first language and therefore imply nuance that native speakers don't?

    Correct. Particularly the French inventors of the medium. There they are animated designs.

    Does a flat refer to a tire or a place people live? Which definition is wrong? Is it possible the answer is neither?

    Calling all sparking wine champagne isn't wrong. It just makes you sound like an idiot.

    What does the word gay, or coke, mean? Is that today's definition?

    The problem is that you are wanting to refer to all LGBTQ+ people as gay and all soft drinks as coke.

    Do you think the definition for the word cartoon can't or hasn't changed?

    I don't disagree that it has expanded from print to film. The problem is that it hasn't expanded as far as you think.

    Why do you think your opinion on that has any bearing on the fact of it?

    Ditto.

    However, I have reinforced my opinion with links and counter arguments. So far your bluster is only hot air.

    Go on. Show me the winners of the "Oscar for best Cartoon".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Gotcha, so you’re just content in your bubble. I've already shown you that's not the whole sentence, and the very wiki article you've linked refutes what you’re saying.

    Go enjoy your cartoons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    This debate doesn't exist in French. It is the Americanization of the word that is incorrect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Je ne savais pas que cette discussion était en français ou à propos de la France.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    "Cartoon" is a synonym for "animation."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Incorrect.

    Most animation is for humor, so people mislabel all animation as a cartoon.

    Is A Scanner Darkly a cartoon? No.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    A Scanner Darkly isn't even straight animation. It's rotoscoped. But yes, it is technically a cartoon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    The "technically a cartoon" part is what is being debated.

    "Animated design" is the definition in other languages (particularly in french, by its inventor). Yes a cartoon is an animated design, but not all animated designs are cartoons.

    Let's make it simple. Is a moving technical blueprint of a car engine a cartoon?

    • Promise kids an afternoon of cartoons and show them Mazda MX5 engines and you'll have a riot.

    • Tell an motor engineer that their CAD presentation is a cartoon and they will kick you out the meeting.

    No. Not all Animated Designs are cartoons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    satire, caricature, or humor, and can be animated

    Man you chose a weird hill to die on. This fits you. You are a cartoon! Case in point case in point 2. I think someone could have a field day with these exchanges and it's quite meta (are we doing meta still?)

    ^^anime is japanese and/or korean and/or chinese cartoons^^

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Whether you agree with it or not, there is a significant cultural stigma in the West around the word "cartoon". As others have pointed out, for a very long time it was almost exclusively associated with comic strips in the newspaper and then animated children's television.

    It's similar to how "comic books" was set aside in favor of "graphic novels". "Watchmen" is not, colloquially, a comic book. Neither is "The Killing Joke".

    "Animated film" is another example of a term that was adopted to distance some content from the stigma of "cartoons".

    For a very, very long time in the west animated content was the exclusive territory of children's entertainment.

    Literal, dictionary definitions may allow the use of "cartoon" to describe any animated content, but it's a lot like the word "sports". Its usage has evolved to imply a specific subset (athletic competition), even if you can technically say you're doing a variety of non-athletic activities "for sport".

    And I say all this as someone in their 40s who truly enjoys American cartoons, adult animated series, anime, and a variety of other media generally skewed towards a younger audience.

    So yeah, I don't call anime cartoons for the same reason I don't call hunting a sport :)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah. Like, cartoons are generally for kids. Bluey is a cartoon. But no one really calls The Simpsons a cartoon. The Simpsons is "animated". Anime is a catch all (from a westerners perspective, at least) for anything animated out of Japan, regardless of the intended audience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Look, people will make up all sorts of bullshit to not admit that they like comics and cartoons.

    Bugs Bunny? Cartoon. Disney's Robin Hood? Cartoon Macross, Ghost in the Machine, Grave of the Fireflies? Cartoon

    Same shit for comics. Far Side, Superman or Chainsaw Man? Comics

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    bruh, I like comics and cartoons, I said it bluntly in my post, but that doesn't change my opinion on the vernacular.

    Hunting isn't a sport, Watchmen isn't a comic book, and Ghost in the Shell isn't a cartoon.

    You don't have to agree, but you also don't have to be a dick about it and demean people for their opinions on language

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    I'm not sure that's unpopular at all. They are objectively cartoons.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    As someone who likes both Cartoons and Anime equally, I have yet to find someone who doesn't get offended by me saying that.

    Hi, it's me, someone who doesn't judge what you enjoy. This does not affect me or put anyone down. I am unoffended. Pleased to meet you.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I get it. I think you may be preaching to the choir here on the fediverse, but I think this is actually an unpopular opinion IRL.

    There's a connotation of childishness or simple-mindedness to the word "cartoon", at least in my neck of the language, born of the era of newspaper funny pages and saturday morning cartoons for kids. Some people (but not all) use "cartoon" to mean any visual art (still or animated) that isn't either hyper-realistic or actual IRL footage, and I think those two things give rise to the notion that all animated or cartoonish media is only suitable for children. The natural next step in this chain of thought is that any adult who enjoys any animated or cartoonish media must be childish.

    It's a stigma I learned as a child and had to get over as an adult, and I'm glad I did; there's a lot of great animated content out there that I would have missed out on if I hadn't. Some of it, like Bob's Burgers, is kid-friendly but still has some really great storytelling. Some, like Bojack Horseman or Archer, are more squarely aimed at adult audiences, and also have some really great storytelling.

    I haven't mentioned anything that falls under the "Anime" umbrella; that's not because I don't like anime, but I am simply late to the game and there is an insane amount of content, and it feels paralyzing figuring out where to start. I keep having One Piece recommended to me, and I would like to start climbing that mountain one day, but 1000+ episodes and counting is a daunting mountain.

    That's all, I'm just writing stuff because I should be sleeping but can't, and this is preferable to lying awake in bed with my thoughts. Hope your boredom is a pleasant one :)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I get it. I think you may be preaching to the choir here on the fediverse, but I think this is actually an unpopular opinion IRL.

    We should have an only_unpopular_irl community

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I think that's an idea with legs. So many posts on this comm get responses on the theme of "That opinion, while possibly unpopular with the general public, is extremely popular on the internet / in the fediverse", often accompanied by some suspicion of gaming the system for upvotes. I think it would be interesting to see the differences between c/only_unpopular_irl and c/only_unpopular_on_fedi.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I mean ... some people say it to be insulting. "you still watch cartoons?"

    It shouldn't be but you know how people are ...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    I mean... yeah... sorta. That's like saying Comic Books and Manga are the same thing. Sure, there is some overlap, but they are both on a pretty different wavelength. I think the difference is the cultural weight behind them. Cartoons in the west are entertainment mostly aimed at children. Anime has that, sure, but there is a whole slew of it aimed at adults, too. You can argue that the West has adult cartoons, but I think you'd be stretching it to say they are even remotely the same. Only in recent years have cartoons really taken a transgressive turn in the public eye.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    I think one indicator of this is that I’ve never once ever heard anyone refer to something like king of the hill or South Park as a cartoon. They’re just TV shows, not cartoons. Cartoon implies “kids”. Anime does not. So to an American, calling anime a cartoon is insulting, because it would be like calling Game of Thrones a cartoon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    On the other hand, I have heard both referred to as cartoons, often with some derogatory prefix like "pervert" or "Democrat". Ditto The Simpsons. I always assumed that calling them cartoons was fairly widespread; maybe it's a southern and/or conservative thing specifically.

    It does usually carry the connotation of an insult; IME there's generally an understanding in conservative circles that anything "cartoonish" is inherently childish and therefore unworthy of any respectable adult's attention, and any adult who admits to enjoying animated TV is given a raised eyebrow, at least by the older folks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I grew up in Texas and don’t remember anyone ever calling any of those shows cartoons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Never??? Not even like "Cartman is a cartoon character from South Park"??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I’ve never heard anyone refer to any adult swim type show as a cartoon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    Is that because of the cultural connotations? "Cartoons are for kids and I'm not a kid, so I don't watch cartoons. I will not call South Park or Adult Swim a cartoon because I watch them and I don't watch cartoons."

    That doesn't imply the word is wrong, just that using it that way is taboo in western culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Well yeah, that’s what I was saying. It’s an insult because “cartoons are for kids” is the prevailing thought process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    People used to say games are for kids, now the game industry is bigger than the movie industry, with plenty ofnadults playing. Times change, so do cultural norms and word usage. I'd be unsurprised if in 10 years people think calling something a cartoon is an insult in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Listen, I don’t think it’s an insult, but this post is literally an “unpopular opinion”. Not only that but we’re literally discussing how people see cartoons as being for kids.

    People used to say games are for kids, now the game industry is bigger than the movie industry, with plenty ofnadults playing. Times change, so do cultural norms and word usage

    People didn’t say this in the 80s and 90s. They only started calling them for kids in the 2000s when republicans had to find another boogeyman to attack. Then you can see people started to figure out that was clearly stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    In the 80s and 90s, I knew of no adults who played computer games, but plenty of kids did. Advertising was targeted at preteens to young adults. I still know people who roll their eyes at the idea of adults playing computer games. This was very much a norm that only started to change in the 2000s, which is when conservatives started clutching at pearls. If you look at revenue charts, it really started picking up around 2005, doubled from 1995 to 2010, and increased by about 150% from 2010 to 2022.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Yeah I get why people don't want to call them cartoons. I will say though that animation in the us has changed so much that it is kinda moot.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    It is japenese cartoon. So yes call it as it is

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Word

    Word, Japan

  • source
  • I find it a hairy topic because the terms mean different things for different people. A cartoon is something that's animated to me, anime is just Japanese cartoons with a distinct style.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    The people you hang out with seem like giant jackass nerds. You should aggressively make them feel bad for their shitty gate keeping.

    I bet you “acktuallly” is their most used vocabulary.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Connotation vs denotation.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I feel the same and I think taking offense to people referring to it as such is kind of gatekeeping in a way.

    I think on a technical note, in Japan, anime is just short for animation anyway. It's not actively trying to be it's own thing. They're literally calling out what it is: animation.

    Cartoons are also animation. In my mind, whatever you call it, it's an animation. Retro Disney movies, people would commonly call an animation but not a cartoon in the similar way people take offense about calling anime a cartoon. Makes no sense to me. Then again, maybe that's just the engineer in me trying to apply logic to it all.

    In any case, to me, they're all just animation. Different styles and target audience, yes, but just animation.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I mean, I kinda see it as calling astronauts cosmonauts. It's slightly less precise but still refer to the same-ish concept.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    the main difference is that cartoons are for children and anime is for people who are sexually attracted to children

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    “Cartoons” have an English interpretation for being narratively simple. Whether they’re 3-4 panel comic strips or political speech or 30-minute kids shows, they tend to be fundamentally bite-sized morsels of media and do not traditionally evoke notions of grand storytelling or significant narrative merit.

    There is no shortage of anime series and films that I’d classify as cartoons. Cartoons are fine and respectable entertainment, but they are only a small subset of all animated media.

    Fans of the anime art form are justified in bristling at someone who calls all anime “cartoons”, or animated media from any other country for that matter. Tokyo Godfathers, The Tale of Princess Kaguya and Mind Game are all dense, complex films, which pushes them outside the bounds of what most people categorize as cartoons. Yuri Norstein, Hayao Miyazaki and Jan Švankmajer make animated films, not cartoons.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    So a cartoon with a coherent story, like ATLA for example, is an anime then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Actually, yes. ATLA is generally considered closer to anime than American cartoons, and is heavily influenced by anime

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    No-one calls the DCAU an anime, and I daresay for its time that Justice League TAS had one of the most intriguing and thoughtful plotlines in the whole collection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It was a bigger deal a generation ago when adult themed animation was relatively novel.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
    • Cartoon = simplified themes and characters, even if it's high quality animation.
    • Anime = complex themes and characters

    Cartoon the word invokes idea of a caricature. Animation (Anime is short for animation) on the other hand doesn't.

    Several cartoons which aren't Japanese (so weren't called anime when they launched) have been classified as anime because of the complex story telling and characters. Most famous example are Avatar, Jack the samurai.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I don't think that's a very applicable categorization. Anime is just a Japanese export, and there have been French, Canadian and American productions over the years that closely resemble visual styles that are mistaken for it. Anime doesn't necessarily mean anything is more complex, and we just don't have the same cultural attachment to animation as a medium to have formed the more distinct categories to describe western equivalents.

    Anime is a wide range, with everything from looney-toons style gags and cultural riffing, to action oriented power scaling and then much more mature, political or dramatic presentations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Even in Japan, people differentiate between anime with more basic or complex themes.

    The simplified difference is standard in foreign (non Japanese) communities which don't have a culture of complex theme animations being targeted towards adults for entertainment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    What about calling manga's reverse comic books

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I Soviet Russia people jokingly call anime "Chinese porno-cartoons".

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The way I see it, I've seen a few interviews in Japan where elderly people end up calling cartoons like frozen or other disney stuff anime ( using the word anime instead of cartoon ), so I am personally not super fussed over calling anime cartoons. Especially since when I was growing up, I don't ever really remember shows like one piece or pokemon or naruto being called anime on tv.

    I get there absolutely are cultural differences, but I personally view basically any fully animated movie/show a cartoon. I may not call an anime a cartoon, but it's all cartoon to me, in a respectful way.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Technically being called a cartoon is just bigger umbrella term and isn't inaccurate. It's like saying vehicle-truck-Ford-F150. Its all of those.

    I think they just don't want to call it cartoons because it sounds immature. Which I mean, Anime kinda is. That's not a horrible thing, just own it rather than throwing a temper tantrum.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Well I won't deny someone who thinks avatar is an anime, but I am having a culture shock watching the show. And I am sure it's the same for cartoon watchers when they get k-on recommended as a cartoon. I mean would you count a peotry slam or a comedy act as a theater play, just because they perform on a stage? Or saying you go to a concert when you visit a club with live dj?

    Or going back to your example, would you appreciate someone saying "lets grab a burger" and then go to the ramen place. What I want to say: it can be misleading.

    I'm just writing this because I am bored that it

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    It's not an insult, but it's different worlds. Cartoons were marketed for kids, while anime (in Europe) was marketed as "animation for teenagers and adults."

  • source