I don't watch a Netflix series that isn't 100% complete already, because they cancel fucking everything. It's not worth the investment.
post
They also lose viewership when jacking prices or repeatedly canceling series.
I basically won't start a series that hasn't ended because I got tired of getting invested into something that gets botched or canceled.
I know it doesn't really matter, but it is landlubber. A lubber is someone who is awkward or clumsy. So a landlubber was someone who was awkward on a ship because they weren't accustomed to the sea.
Huh, all these years I thought land lubber was just a mispronunciation of land lover. An important one just because it has personality, but still technically "wrong". Crazy.
I should do that and also start waiting for the first critics to complain, because I'm still pissed about the first Netflix Avatar season and the second one got me riled up as well.
I mean I will probably still watch the third one, but ... I don't know. I have absolutely no clue how to cope with this.
Netflix, what the fuck are you doing? You were the chosen one. The light bringer!
Oh, wait...
Pepperidge farm remembers when a 'season' was more than 8 40-min episodes.
more than 8 episodes. started in september ended around may. so like around 25 episodes. just give me 25 episodes every year of something like tv shows used to be. new season every year. it shouldn't be hard we had that for years before netflix.
On the one hand, broadcast TV typically had 20-26 episode seasons every year. On the other hand, this often included a lot of filler and could easily lead to huge compromises to get everything done. There will always be trade offs between quantity and quality, and only one of those is contractually obligated.
That being said, I really hate the way streaming has devolved into shows with 8 episodes or less in a season, with some of those episodes being significantly shorter than others, and all of them paced as though they have all the time in the world despite the season being over. That would be awful even if they did release seasons annually and never cancelled things early.
I feel like we figured out the perfect balance with Daredevil season 1. Thirteen really solid episodes, each being exactly as long as they need to be to tell the story they want, and all of them adding up to complete the arc for the season. I could nitpick and criticize some things, but the pacing was absolutely perfect.
Being able to binge watch an entire season in one 8-hour workday you've decided to slack off on, is a bit too short. It's what used to be called miniseries.
Filler or not people felt like they had a relationship with the characters. Now everything is so short and releases so long in between people don't have that.
having 8 episodes isnt exactly helping as its quite limited and is unable to explore more subplots or potential arcs.
10-12 hour long episodes was a good sweet spot.
I kind of find older shows with 24 episode seasons painful to rewatch. It just starts to drag. Even shows I like a lot like Star Trek.
Sometimes I break it up a bit between seasons, I imagine being weekly before helped.
I remember when people used to get so angry that TV shows had 20+ episodes, and were very insistent everything needs to be 13 or less, no fIlLeR! Now we're lucky if we get 10 episodes and 5 seasons. That's basically the equivalent of a long running show (11+ seasons) like Mash or the Big Bang Theory these days.
I don't entirely miss the days of old TV. But outside of what Apple's been putting out (so far they seem to be sticking with their shows; Pluribus and Severance would already be dead in the water on Netflix), it's become impossible to actually enjoy anything now. I loved Star Trek Lower Decks. People who love and hate Star Trek have told me how much they love it. It's a crime it doesn't have more seasons. And that's a long running show by today's standards! There's way too many shows like that now.
20+ episodes per season was real TV. You had good episodes and bad episodes and great episodes. This 10 episode crap is what we used to call a miniseries. More like a stretched out movie than a TV show.
The ratcheting up of budgets and viewer expectations with them has not been good for TV. It’s too high stakes. You’ll never get the brilliance of a Star Trek: TNG bottle show that way.
The same thing has happened to video games. Publishers spend half a billion dollars developing a video game, and then everyone complains that AAA games aren’t taking risks anymore. At least we have indie games to fill the void. There’s nothing like that with TV. YouTube may be great but it’s still a long way off from the old days of TV, except for maybe non fiction stuff (science and documentaries).
10 episodes seems quite rare for most shows now.
Yeah but this 8 episode season has a bigger budget than all the 90s shows together so if it gets fewer than 4 billion viewers the first week it airs the show gets canceled.
Did people pay to investigate that? Because, uh, fucking duh
Literally all you had to do was go to a Stranger Things subreddit/facebook group literally any time between seasons (2-3, etc.) and you'd have novellas-worth of proof.
I'm guessing the investigation was to determine how strong the effect is, to see how much money is worth spending to avoid the issue?
I saw a study the other day explaining that people that learned how to swim at some point in their life are statistically less likely to drown.
also cancelling seasons after 2 or 3. and haivng only 8-10 episodes which is pathetically small, and is a penny pinching method by streaming companies, they want to avoid paying ACTORS "exorbitant" amount of sums of money.
sandman and Invicible between the 1st-2nd season was abysmally long like 3years. it doesnt take 3 years to make 8 episodes at all.
similarly with orville 6 year and only handful of episodes, one of the leads said it was unaffordable for most people working on the show, to have so long of hiatus. although pallacki said it partially due to mcfarlane writing all of the epsiodes himself.
Re The Orville,
As I understand he's now at least written all the episodes for the next season, now it's just a matter of getting everything together (the equally hard part).
I thought he would stick with The Orville on a regular basis, but maybe once you achieve your dream it's easy to start looking at other projects.
Paramount called his bluff on the Ted live action series (he would only do it if they could have movie level budget for CGI Ted, and they did, for two seasons at least). So I think he jumped at that since it seemed like a limited time offer.
Plus now he's diving back into animation with a Stewie spin-off show and a Ted animated show.
I do hope we get Orville season 4 someday, especially with Star Trek coming to an end (for now).
I didn't know he had all those projects going. He's also supposed to be working on a Dungeon Crawler Carl TV show. That's a lot for one person.
its probably going to be problematic when some of the actors arnt coming back, like lead pallacki, she said she wont be coming back due to hiatus.
Maybe Netflix can commission a study to investigate whether viewers are put off by most of their shows being not very good. They might learn something.
I think you underestimate how much the average person loves to consume utter trash media.
Netflix has no idea or confidence in how to evaluate what a good show is, so they have to wait for user data to tell them.
But of course their shit tier layout makes 80% of their catalogue hard to find, so unless they're really pushing a show a production can easily fall through the cracks.
Yeah I remember always browsing Netflix and seeing the same shit that I had no interest in showing up every time I looked for a show to watch. Shit that I was purposefully ignoring for months and months. But then I learn about an interesting show somewhere else, search for it on Netflix, and find a good show has been somewhere in the shadows the entire time with 4+ seasons and I had never come across it a single time while browsing forever and never finding anything to watch.
I assume that their sort algorithm is trying to balance your interest in a show vs. the licensing fees they will need to pay. Remember, Netflix does not want you to watch all day, every day. They want you to barely get enough value to justify keeping your subscription.
I still haven’t forgiven them for canceling “Kaos”.
New data confirms CEOs need data and cannot just think for 5 seconds like a normal human being
This
Its an obvious thing and I've stopped watching countless shows because it took years to get to the next season of just only 10 over produced episodes
Those that I did watch, it took me half of those episodes yo just get back into it again, and quite a few I just dropped out before I got to that half because of course you're completely out of it
Then the 10 episodes... Give me back the 24 45 minutes episodes, PLEASE. I want the filler bottle episodes as many of the best episodes are bottle shows. The few over produced episodes are typically lots of bowwow, fireworks and bling bling fun spectacles, but they're rarely the best episodes.
Yeah no shit, I stop caring after 2 years
It's also because a season is only 8 episodes and dumped all at once. You don't have time to digest it. You end up binging the episodes so other people don't spoil it for you, then you easily forget what happened. It's like Netflix purposefully designed their shows to be forgettable.
"No shit" /thread
The shitty writing is also hurting Netflix viewership. As is cancelling shows that are well written and have a fanbase just because you have to pay the actors and staff more after 3 seasons.
What you don't want to wait 3 years for a new season of a show that will be far more written by a committee of execs who know nothing of artistry and only care about metrics and what's currently popular, only to find out a month to a year later that it's been canceled prematurely?
that too, sandman had the comic to go on, but they still are pretty cringly written, not to mention change the characthers away from the source material. we know gwendoline was great, but she doesnt fit into the lucifer role. blood of zeus had issues too apparently.
What is the reason for the long waits anyway? Especially considering that actual runtime of an average season nowadays is 50% or less than what it used to be.
mostly because of bigger budgets making scheduling harder. higher profile actors, bigger crews, potential location filming, more time required for effects and post production.
I also heard writing takes longer because it has to be refined and tightened to fit in shorter seasons.
covid and writers strike also made everything worse for a while.
and part of it is probably intentional trying to milk the golden goose for as long as possible. apologies for the mixed metaphor.
Broadcast/cable TV had a schedule to fill. More than anything else, they needed to fill time slots. They planned around a calendar so annual seasons were only natural. That's also why they tended to have longer seasons, because it's easier to keep viewers coming back on schedule when they are already interested in a show. Plus it's cheaper to to make one long show than two short shows. It leads to brutal production schedules and massive creative compromises, but it fills airtime and that's what counts.
In other words, the economics of old school TV were about filling time while maximizing ratings and minimizing costs, which incentivizes making a smaller number of shows with longer seasons and regular releases.
Streaming has very different incentives. They don't care about filling a schedule, they just want you to subscribe. Every new show is a potential draw, and the more titles they have the more likely it is that one of them will appeal to you. They are incentivized to fill their catalog, not their calendar. As such, there's nowhere near as much pressure to churn out seasons like clockwork. If anything, they probably get more bang for their buck by waiting longer between seasons so that the release of each season is more of an event.
Hell, it doesn't even matter that much if it hurts the show in the long run. As long as they keep getting subscribers and have new shows (or popular old shows) to pull people in, they don't really care if an existing show dies.
that is the companies/studios excuses. its really just to avoid paying the big actors "too much money". 8 episodes isnt exactly a time consuming project, many of the shows on netflix have very poor looking props ery cheaply made, and acting/writing kinda is very bad.
sandman was a good premise but it was too cringey in many of aspects.
I think it all comes down to netflix not greenlighting layer seasons until the previous one did well, and they release them complete. This means that by the time they decide to do a later season the whole team is working on other stuff.
Basically Netflix is handling business like a tech-bro company without stock, rather than a tv production company.
the silicon valley philosophy is toxic and stupid even for tech, for art/entertainment is basically leprosy.

top 100 comments