top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 267 points 1 month ago* (46 children)

I don't watch a Netflix series that isn't 100% complete already, because they cancel fucking everything. It's not worth the investment.

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    I learned decades ago to do the same with book series.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I'm glad I never got into A Song of Fire and Ice when my friend recommended it to me about it in university about 20 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Too true. I was recommended that too about 20 years ago, I had been out of university for a while by then. I looked, thought, I'll wait for it to finish. I'm really surprised he hasn't just hired some Brandon Sanderson type to finish it like Sanderson did for Wheel of Time. Maybe after he dies.... I'm not being morbid, and I don't wish death on Martin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Unless he changed his mind, he has already said he won't let anyone else finish it even if he dies. So chances are slim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Hard to stop anyone from doing anything once you're a corpse. If there's enough money involved, somebody is gonna finish that series whether he likes it or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    His estate will also have fuck you money. So if the executor sticks with his wishes, then it'll be difficult and costly for anyone to go against it. There is always the chance they will try to make more money by selling the rights though. So who knows?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    I’m still mad about Santa Clarita Diet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I’m mad about Cowboy Bebop, which was actually pretty good, despite what you may have heard.

    Netflix didn’t advertise it to normies and die hard anime fans trashed it. I think if they had advertised it to people like my dad, it would have done well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Cho was the right guy for the job 20 years ago. Vicious did not need the Kylo Ren treatment. Faye was neutered. Ed was absent. Jet was perfect. Overall the show was too fast where it needed to be slow and too slow where it needed to be fast.

    Not surprised it got canceled. It's a shame to think of what could have been.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    The Vicious stuff was my least favorite part. I actually liked how they changed that story quite a bit, but the scenes just didn’t hold up. Idk if it was casting or editing.

    Chris Yost did a great job with the three main characters though and I think that’s the right take as he goes into production on Dungeon Crawler Carl so I’m excited to see how that turns out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    That was actually the straw that broke my back. Cancelled every subscription I had and went back to sailing.

    So I guess in a way I should thank them on helping me save hundreds of dollars a year in this economy.

    Still doesn't fill the void left by the SCD cancellation...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Cancelled every subscription I had and went back to sailing.

    … helping me save hundreds of dollars a year in this economy.

    I’m gonna need to see the math on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    Yeah Kaos was the last blow to me, especially being it sounds like everyone involved in that really enjoyed it, it was the numer 1 show at the time, and the next two parts were already outlined and ready to shoot with an actual ending already in mind.

    Netflix proved with Kaos that there is no actual logic behind their content decisions

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    not just netflix, every streaming service/studio does that now.

    I really like the artist/author Brian K Vaughn. Millions of people do. One of the best selling authors of graphic novels that exists.

    Just finished reading "Y: The Last Man", oh, there's a TV show?.... canceled after one season....

    "Paper Girls"?..... canceled after one season...

    If they try to tell me that "Saga" is in the works for a TV adaptation (which... fucking good luck) I would hardly be exited for it. Because why get my hopes up? The books are amazing anyways. The art is beautiful in the way it was illustrated. The only advantage a TV show has ever given is being able to easily share the story with family and watch together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Apple doing it right. They have Silo and they just finished season 3 and 4 already filmed and will be out next year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    If anything they're adding too many seasons! Ted Lasso was done. Also I thought For all mankind was done... Had such a great finale. Then the latest season dropped!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    He has specifically said Saga will never be adapted while he has the power to say so. He says the story fits the comic medium perfectly and would be diluted going to film. This was even before Y and PG got canned. I really love his work, and actually enjoyed the 2 shows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    I just went ahead and read those Brian K Vaughn series without ever watching the shows because they actually have endings; except for Saga, of course, which will doubtless continue in fits and starts for another twenty years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I don't know if it's true but I read somewhere that Netflix cancels a lot of shows after 3 seasons because there are things in the contracts where people get paid more to make the show after three seasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I do that with all series. I watched Breaking Bad shortly after the last episode aired, and did so with all series ever since. I have a list of series I want to watch, but they will wait until they are done.

    I don't watch half of a movie either, why would I watch half of a series.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 97 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    They also lose viewership when jacking prices or repeatedly canceling series.
    I basically won't start a series that hasn't ended because I got tired of getting invested into something that gets botched or canceled.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I know it doesn't really matter, but it is landlubber. A lubber is someone who is awkward or clumsy. So a landlubber was someone who was awkward on a ship because they weren't accustomed to the sea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I should do that and also start waiting for the first critics to complain, because I'm still pissed about the first Netflix Avatar season and the second one got me riled up as well.

    I mean I will probably still watch the third one, but ... I don't know. I have absolutely no clue how to cope with this.

    Netflix, what the fuck are you doing? You were the chosen one. The light bringer!

    Oh, wait...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 72 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Pepperidge farm remembers when a 'season' was more than 8 40-min episodes.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    more than 8 episodes. started in september ended around may. so like around 25 episodes. just give me 25 episodes every year of something like tv shows used to be. new season every year. it shouldn't be hard we had that for years before netflix.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    On the one hand, broadcast TV typically had 20-26 episode seasons every year. On the other hand, this often included a lot of filler and could easily lead to huge compromises to get everything done. There will always be trade offs between quantity and quality, and only one of those is contractually obligated.

    That being said, I really hate the way streaming has devolved into shows with 8 episodes or less in a season, with some of those episodes being significantly shorter than others, and all of them paced as though they have all the time in the world despite the season being over. That would be awful even if they did release seasons annually and never cancelled things early.

    I feel like we figured out the perfect balance with Daredevil season 1. Thirteen really solid episodes, each being exactly as long as they need to be to tell the story they want, and all of them adding up to complete the arc for the season. I could nitpick and criticize some things, but the pacing was absolutely perfect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Filler or not people felt like they had a relationship with the characters. Now everything is so short and releases so long in between people don't have that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    10-12 hour long episodes was a good sweet spot.

    I kind of find older shows with 24 episode seasons painful to rewatch. It just starts to drag. Even shows I like a lot like Star Trek.

    Sometimes I break it up a bit between seasons, I imagine being weekly before helped.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I remember when people used to get so angry that TV shows had 20+ episodes, and were very insistent everything needs to be 13 or less, no fIlLeR! Now we're lucky if we get 10 episodes and 5 seasons. That's basically the equivalent of a long running show (11+ seasons) like Mash or the Big Bang Theory these days.

    I don't entirely miss the days of old TV. But outside of what Apple's been putting out (so far they seem to be sticking with their shows; Pluribus and Severance would already be dead in the water on Netflix), it's become impossible to actually enjoy anything now. I loved Star Trek Lower Decks. People who love and hate Star Trek have told me how much they love it. It's a crime it doesn't have more seasons. And that's a long running show by today's standards! There's way too many shows like that now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago*

    20+ episodes per season was real TV. You had good episodes and bad episodes and great episodes. This 10 episode crap is what we used to call a miniseries. More like a stretched out movie than a TV show.

    The ratcheting up of budgets and viewer expectations with them has not been good for TV. It’s too high stakes. You’ll never get the brilliance of a Star Trek: TNG bottle show that way.

    The same thing has happened to video games. Publishers spend half a billion dollars developing a video game, and then everyone complains that AAA games aren’t taking risks anymore. At least we have indie games to fill the void. There’s nothing like that with TV. YouTube may be great but it’s still a long way off from the old days of TV, except for maybe non fiction stuff (science and documentaries).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 112 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Did people pay to investigate that? Because, uh, fucking duh

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Literally all you had to do was go to a Stranger Things subreddit/facebook group literally any time between seasons (2-3, etc.) and you'd have novellas-worth of proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I saw a study the other day explaining that people that learned how to swim at some point in their life are statistically less likely to drown.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    also cancelling seasons after 2 or 3. and haivng only 8-10 episodes which is pathetically small, and is a penny pinching method by streaming companies, they want to avoid paying ACTORS "exorbitant" amount of sums of money.

    sandman and Invicible between the 1st-2nd season was abysmally long like 3years. it doesnt take 3 years to make 8 episodes at all.

    similarly with orville 6 year and only handful of episodes, one of the leads said it was unaffordable for most people working on the show, to have so long of hiatus. although pallacki said it partially due to mcfarlane writing all of the epsiodes himself.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Re The Orville,

    As I understand he's now at least written all the episodes for the next season, now it's just a matter of getting everything together (the equally hard part).

    I thought he would stick with The Orville on a regular basis, but maybe once you achieve your dream it's easy to start looking at other projects.

    Paramount called his bluff on the Ted live action series (he would only do it if they could have movie level budget for CGI Ted, and they did, for two seasons at least). So I think he jumped at that since it seemed like a limited time offer.

    Plus now he's diving back into animation with a Stewie spin-off show and a Ted animated show.

    I do hope we get Orville season 4 someday, especially with Star Trek coming to an end (for now).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Maybe Netflix can commission a study to investigate whether viewers are put off by most of their shows being not very good. They might learn something.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Netflix has no idea or confidence in how to evaluate what a good show is, so they have to wait for user data to tell them.

    But of course their shit tier layout makes 80% of their catalogue hard to find, so unless they're really pushing a show a production can easily fall through the cracks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yeah I remember always browsing Netflix and seeing the same shit that I had no interest in showing up every time I looked for a show to watch. Shit that I was purposefully ignoring for months and months. But then I learn about an interesting show somewhere else, search for it on Netflix, and find a good show has been somewhere in the shadows the entire time with 4+ seasons and I had never come across it a single time while browsing forever and never finding anything to watch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I assume that their sort algorithm is trying to balance your interest in a show vs. the licensing fees they will need to pay. Remember, Netflix does not want you to watch all day, every day. They want you to barely get enough value to justify keeping your subscription.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I still haven’t forgiven them for canceling “Kaos”.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    It seems almost everybody is pissed off at them for cancelling something. It's not a novel thing to say at this point, but I don't bother with their originals any more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    New data confirms CEOs need data and cannot just think for 5 seconds like a normal human being

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    This

    Its an obvious thing and I've stopped watching countless shows because it took years to get to the next season of just only 10 over produced episodes

    Those that I did watch, it took me half of those episodes yo just get back into it again, and quite a few I just dropped out before I got to that half because of course you're completely out of it

    Then the 10 episodes... Give me back the 24 45 minutes episodes, PLEASE. I want the filler bottle episodes as many of the best episodes are bottle shows. The few over produced episodes are typically lots of bowwow, fireworks and bling bling fun spectacles, but they're rarely the best episodes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 1 month ago

    My favorite genre of data science is "Fucking Duh."

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yeah no shit, I stop caring after 2 years

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It's also because a season is only 8 episodes and dumped all at once. You don't have time to digest it. You end up binging the episodes so other people don't spoil it for you, then you easily forget what happened. It's like Netflix purposefully designed their shows to be forgettable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 53 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The shitty writing is also hurting Netflix viewership. As is cancelling shows that are well written and have a fanbase just because you have to pay the actors and staff more after 3 seasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What you don't want to wait 3 years for a new season of a show that will be far more written by a committee of execs who know nothing of artistry and only care about metrics and what's currently popular, only to find out a month to a year later that it's been canceled prematurely?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    that too, sandman had the comic to go on, but they still are pretty cringly written, not to mention change the characthers away from the source material. we know gwendoline was great, but she doesnt fit into the lucifer role. blood of zeus had issues too apparently.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    What is the reason for the long waits anyway? Especially considering that actual runtime of an average season nowadays is 50% or less than what it used to be.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    mostly because of bigger budgets making scheduling harder. higher profile actors, bigger crews, potential location filming, more time required for effects and post production.

    I also heard writing takes longer because it has to be refined and tightened to fit in shorter seasons.

    covid and writers strike also made everything worse for a while.

    and part of it is probably intentional trying to milk the golden goose for as long as possible. apologies for the mixed metaphor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Maybe they should stop writing stuff for a second screen, and stop repeating the same thing over and over just in case you where on your phone the first couple of times.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Broadcast/cable TV had a schedule to fill. More than anything else, they needed to fill time slots. They planned around a calendar so annual seasons were only natural. That's also why they tended to have longer seasons, because it's easier to keep viewers coming back on schedule when they are already interested in a show. Plus it's cheaper to to make one long show than two short shows. It leads to brutal production schedules and massive creative compromises, but it fills airtime and that's what counts.

    In other words, the economics of old school TV were about filling time while maximizing ratings and minimizing costs, which incentivizes making a smaller number of shows with longer seasons and regular releases.

    Streaming has very different incentives. They don't care about filling a schedule, they just want you to subscribe. Every new show is a potential draw, and the more titles they have the more likely it is that one of them will appeal to you. They are incentivized to fill their catalog, not their calendar. As such, there's nowhere near as much pressure to churn out seasons like clockwork. If anything, they probably get more bang for their buck by waiting longer between seasons so that the release of each season is more of an event.

    Hell, it doesn't even matter that much if it hurts the show in the long run. As long as they keep getting subscribers and have new shows (or popular old shows) to pull people in, they don't really care if an existing show dies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    that is the companies/studios excuses. its really just to avoid paying the big actors "too much money". 8 episodes isnt exactly a time consuming project, many of the shows on netflix have very poor looking props ery cheaply made, and acting/writing kinda is very bad.

    sandman was a good premise but it was too cringey in many of aspects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I think it all comes down to netflix not greenlighting layer seasons until the previous one did well, and they release them complete. This means that by the time they decide to do a later season the whole team is working on other stuff.

    Basically Netflix is handling business like a tech-bro company without stock, rather than a tv production company.

    the silicon valley philosophy is toxic and stupid even for tech, for art/entertainment is basically leprosy.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›