I'm not the artist, heresvix is. Source

all 53 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Babe, it's extremely important you see this kitty immediately! ☺️

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Anyone else notice the bunny's shirt upside down?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I didn't notice it the first time around but I did a double check. It's a nice shirt lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Sir, a second dog top rabbit bottom gay comic has hit the internet

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I am both of these people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    🫢 ᜊ ΖƒΙΙŸ

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Does making it upside down help to like reclaim it or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    As a lavenderπŸ’œδΊΊ myself, it's a πŸ‘Œ gotcha moment, 67 kinda play. There’s β€œfag” as in β€œpass me a fag π“‚Έ,” and the unclaimed homonym β€œfascist weak person.” heresvix is using the former homonym, as Bunny is super attracted to fags 8===D.

    I am not ashamed to admit I want some fags⚣ myselfπŸ₯΄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -29 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Keep the furry shit to the furry instance, please.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Hmm... I wonder what makes something furry specifically.

    There's the whole lifestyle thing, but if you're going off of just having antrho characters then... Oh boy, suddenly a lot of things become "furry" even if it's unintentional and completely innocent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    A prude is a person who is easily shocked, offended, or upset by matters relating to sex

    i keep saying i find beastiality gross and furry defenders say "it's not about sex!" your upvoted comment says it is. which is it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Who said anything about furries? Check out Christopher Nolan here, projecting like an imax

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    Whenever I meet a man who routinely barks loud commands to their spouse/partner it makes me immediately hate them.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    My SO and I both yell for each other when we’re across the house or in a noisy environment, lol.

    We’re also sometimes brief in our requests because we’ve been together so long that a vague grunt/syllable and/or gesture is all that’s needed to communicate. Doesn’t mean we love each other any less πŸ˜†

    TL;DR: You can’t know every relationship from a small window of context Β―\(ツ)/Β― understandable heuristic though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    What command was barked? He called his partner using a familiar nickname, and explained why he called for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 2 months ago* (9 children)

    The implicit command is come to me so I can have my desire to show this to you satisfied. Why doesn't he just go to her? Or at least phrase it as a request.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    To a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

    Or, to put it another way:

    To a nail, everything is a hammer.

    Sweeping generalizations are generally a Bad Thing (TM). Especially when done out of context. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Different strokes for different folks. It's ignorant to assume you know the dynamics of a relationship from... A single pane in a comic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I mean I'm not really talking about this fictional couple. I'm talking about real life couples I've seen with this dynamic.

    And personally I think you can in fact tell a lot about people from the way they routinely interact with each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah.. my point still stands buddy. I think you might be projecting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You're entitled to your opinion. It might be worth listening to what others are saying, but I can't force you to do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago*

    You made some assertions based on a misunderstanding of what I was saying, and I corrected them. I agree it's not good to make assumptions based on a single interaction but I'm not doing that.

    So what is there to listen to that you feel I'm not?

    Frankly I'm a bit puzzled by this negative response. Is Lemmy redpilled now or something?

  • source
  • parent