▲ 258 ▼ Checkmate tankies (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 42 points 2 months ago See, communism is when bread lines. And America doesn’t communism. permalink fedilink source
[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 31 points 2 months ago Apparently, socialism is when groceries don't have food. permalink fedilink source
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (9 children) What am I even looking at? permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago (8 children) Guessing something similar to the toilet paper aisles during covid. Which I gotta say also is one that was funny when basically this was done in the US just before the 2020 election... where they showed the shelves of how the stores currently were, followed by a "this is Biden's america". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago But a weird thing here is the lack of shelves, pricing tickets and section labels. It loooks more like they are dismantling/setting up/re-arranging the shelving. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) It was probably the toilet paper thing. Nothing has happened like that since then. Also they fail to point out we increased toilet paper production when it first became a problem and was solved very quickly. Similar to how all our craft distilleries switched to making hand sanitizer instead of booze when the hospitals were on short supply.... Which isn't quite how capitalism usually works so 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) Which isn’t quite how capitalism usually works so 🤷♂️ It still is how capitalism works, lots of people want to buy a product, then companies will sell it. It's not good will it's just business sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) The hand sanitizer was earning the distilleries less money, they didn't have to do that. A lot of them also donated to the hospitals and people in charge of doing the covid tests before we had the at home ones. The toilet paper was capitalism as usual though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) On the whole, while at the start of Covid 19 alchohol sales went up, it overall decreased (most likely due to the lack of social drinking, and bars), Plus marketing etc... "Hey we did our part to help out in this time of need, become a loyal customer". Would take a lot more analysis to see if it actually made less money, or if they were making less money so it made sense to use their unneeded capacity to sell a normally less profitable item and possibly earn some long term good PR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Oh I don't disagree that a lot of the bigger and corporate owned distilleries were doing it for the marketing, booze is a billion dollar industry. When covid hit though, I was manager of a whisky bar and in close contact with a lot of the small batch/craft distilleries around Australia, and knew a lot of the distillers personally. The ones I know of that did switch to hand sanitizer were so small that it was literally an Instagram post to explain why their products weren't currently available. That was the extent of the marketing. They were literally just producing enough to give a weekly supply to the local hospitals so they didn't run out entirely before supply was back up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* I never knew about the hand sanitizer thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago* yup such demand is typically a short term surged demand, so their number crunching might have showed that increase production (from other similar lines that can do so, so they don't actually need new lines) actually could bring in more profits than reducing supply and increase price would permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago (8 children) Guessing something similar to the toilet paper aisles during covid. Which I gotta say also is one that was funny when basically this was done in the US just before the 2020 election... where they showed the shelves of how the stores currently were, followed by a "this is Biden's america". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago But a weird thing here is the lack of shelves, pricing tickets and section labels. It loooks more like they are dismantling/setting up/re-arranging the shelving. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) It was probably the toilet paper thing. Nothing has happened like that since then. Also they fail to point out we increased toilet paper production when it first became a problem and was solved very quickly. Similar to how all our craft distilleries switched to making hand sanitizer instead of booze when the hospitals were on short supply.... Which isn't quite how capitalism usually works so 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) Which isn’t quite how capitalism usually works so 🤷♂️ It still is how capitalism works, lots of people want to buy a product, then companies will sell it. It's not good will it's just business sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) The hand sanitizer was earning the distilleries less money, they didn't have to do that. A lot of them also donated to the hospitals and people in charge of doing the covid tests before we had the at home ones. The toilet paper was capitalism as usual though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) On the whole, while at the start of Covid 19 alchohol sales went up, it overall decreased (most likely due to the lack of social drinking, and bars), Plus marketing etc... "Hey we did our part to help out in this time of need, become a loyal customer". Would take a lot more analysis to see if it actually made less money, or if they were making less money so it made sense to use their unneeded capacity to sell a normally less profitable item and possibly earn some long term good PR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Oh I don't disagree that a lot of the bigger and corporate owned distilleries were doing it for the marketing, booze is a billion dollar industry. When covid hit though, I was manager of a whisky bar and in close contact with a lot of the small batch/craft distilleries around Australia, and knew a lot of the distillers personally. The ones I know of that did switch to hand sanitizer were so small that it was literally an Instagram post to explain why their products weren't currently available. That was the extent of the marketing. They were literally just producing enough to give a weekly supply to the local hospitals so they didn't run out entirely before supply was back up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* I never knew about the hand sanitizer thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago* yup such demand is typically a short term surged demand, so their number crunching might have showed that increase production (from other similar lines that can do so, so they don't actually need new lines) actually could bring in more profits than reducing supply and increase price would permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago But a weird thing here is the lack of shelves, pricing tickets and section labels. It loooks more like they are dismantling/setting up/re-arranging the shelving. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (6 children) It was probably the toilet paper thing. Nothing has happened like that since then. Also they fail to point out we increased toilet paper production when it first became a problem and was solved very quickly. Similar to how all our craft distilleries switched to making hand sanitizer instead of booze when the hospitals were on short supply.... Which isn't quite how capitalism usually works so 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) Which isn’t quite how capitalism usually works so 🤷♂️ It still is how capitalism works, lots of people want to buy a product, then companies will sell it. It's not good will it's just business sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) The hand sanitizer was earning the distilleries less money, they didn't have to do that. A lot of them also donated to the hospitals and people in charge of doing the covid tests before we had the at home ones. The toilet paper was capitalism as usual though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) On the whole, while at the start of Covid 19 alchohol sales went up, it overall decreased (most likely due to the lack of social drinking, and bars), Plus marketing etc... "Hey we did our part to help out in this time of need, become a loyal customer". Would take a lot more analysis to see if it actually made less money, or if they were making less money so it made sense to use their unneeded capacity to sell a normally less profitable item and possibly earn some long term good PR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Oh I don't disagree that a lot of the bigger and corporate owned distilleries were doing it for the marketing, booze is a billion dollar industry. When covid hit though, I was manager of a whisky bar and in close contact with a lot of the small batch/craft distilleries around Australia, and knew a lot of the distillers personally. The ones I know of that did switch to hand sanitizer were so small that it was literally an Instagram post to explain why their products weren't currently available. That was the extent of the marketing. They were literally just producing enough to give a weekly supply to the local hospitals so they didn't run out entirely before supply was back up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* I never knew about the hand sanitizer thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago* yup such demand is typically a short term surged demand, so their number crunching might have showed that increase production (from other similar lines that can do so, so they don't actually need new lines) actually could bring in more profits than reducing supply and increase price would permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (5 children) Which isn’t quite how capitalism usually works so 🤷♂️ It still is how capitalism works, lots of people want to buy a product, then companies will sell it. It's not good will it's just business sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) The hand sanitizer was earning the distilleries less money, they didn't have to do that. A lot of them also donated to the hospitals and people in charge of doing the covid tests before we had the at home ones. The toilet paper was capitalism as usual though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) On the whole, while at the start of Covid 19 alchohol sales went up, it overall decreased (most likely due to the lack of social drinking, and bars), Plus marketing etc... "Hey we did our part to help out in this time of need, become a loyal customer". Would take a lot more analysis to see if it actually made less money, or if they were making less money so it made sense to use their unneeded capacity to sell a normally less profitable item and possibly earn some long term good PR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Oh I don't disagree that a lot of the bigger and corporate owned distilleries were doing it for the marketing, booze is a billion dollar industry. When covid hit though, I was manager of a whisky bar and in close contact with a lot of the small batch/craft distilleries around Australia, and knew a lot of the distillers personally. The ones I know of that did switch to hand sanitizer were so small that it was literally an Instagram post to explain why their products weren't currently available. That was the extent of the marketing. They were literally just producing enough to give a weekly supply to the local hospitals so they didn't run out entirely before supply was back up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* I never knew about the hand sanitizer thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago* yup such demand is typically a short term surged demand, so their number crunching might have showed that increase production (from other similar lines that can do so, so they don't actually need new lines) actually could bring in more profits than reducing supply and increase price would permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children) The hand sanitizer was earning the distilleries less money, they didn't have to do that. A lot of them also donated to the hospitals and people in charge of doing the covid tests before we had the at home ones. The toilet paper was capitalism as usual though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) On the whole, while at the start of Covid 19 alchohol sales went up, it overall decreased (most likely due to the lack of social drinking, and bars), Plus marketing etc... "Hey we did our part to help out in this time of need, become a loyal customer". Would take a lot more analysis to see if it actually made less money, or if they were making less money so it made sense to use their unneeded capacity to sell a normally less profitable item and possibly earn some long term good PR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Oh I don't disagree that a lot of the bigger and corporate owned distilleries were doing it for the marketing, booze is a billion dollar industry. When covid hit though, I was manager of a whisky bar and in close contact with a lot of the small batch/craft distilleries around Australia, and knew a lot of the distillers personally. The ones I know of that did switch to hand sanitizer were so small that it was literally an Instagram post to explain why their products weren't currently available. That was the extent of the marketing. They were literally just producing enough to give a weekly supply to the local hospitals so they didn't run out entirely before supply was back up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* I never knew about the hand sanitizer thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) On the whole, while at the start of Covid 19 alchohol sales went up, it overall decreased (most likely due to the lack of social drinking, and bars), Plus marketing etc... "Hey we did our part to help out in this time of need, become a loyal customer". Would take a lot more analysis to see if it actually made less money, or if they were making less money so it made sense to use their unneeded capacity to sell a normally less profitable item and possibly earn some long term good PR. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Oh I don't disagree that a lot of the bigger and corporate owned distilleries were doing it for the marketing, booze is a billion dollar industry. When covid hit though, I was manager of a whisky bar and in close contact with a lot of the small batch/craft distilleries around Australia, and knew a lot of the distillers personally. The ones I know of that did switch to hand sanitizer were so small that it was literally an Instagram post to explain why their products weren't currently available. That was the extent of the marketing. They were literally just producing enough to give a weekly supply to the local hospitals so they didn't run out entirely before supply was back up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago Oh I don't disagree that a lot of the bigger and corporate owned distilleries were doing it for the marketing, booze is a billion dollar industry. When covid hit though, I was manager of a whisky bar and in close contact with a lot of the small batch/craft distilleries around Australia, and knew a lot of the distillers personally. The ones I know of that did switch to hand sanitizer were so small that it was literally an Instagram post to explain why their products weren't currently available. That was the extent of the marketing. They were literally just producing enough to give a weekly supply to the local hospitals so they didn't run out entirely before supply was back up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* I never knew about the hand sanitizer thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 months ago* yup such demand is typically a short term surged demand, so their number crunching might have showed that increase production (from other similar lines that can do so, so they don't actually need new lines) actually could bring in more profits than reducing supply and increase price would permalink fedilink source parent
all 12 comments