all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 73 points 2 months ago

That's kinda funny actually, although kinda sleazy.

I wonder if the staff managed to hint to the dates that he's a regular.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    I had a boss do this. It was a little awkward because I couldn't figure out why. There were several groups and we were a couple of minutes in before I figured out that they'd just been going to the same puzzle with different groups.

    I still don't know what that was about, but it made me forget about the room entirely and try to figure out why you'd go through the same one more than once (it wasn't super interesting, but there were a few neat parts). Another guy just asked for a hint whenever the bosses didn't respond and that was pretty good.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    As much as I like escape rooms, I'd definitely reject the idea of having a first date with a man be somewhere where I'm locked in with him for at least x amount of time and I'm being judged on my actions. All I would be thinking about is "get me out of here!"

    I know there are people monitoring the situation but I still would never agree to be so dependent on strangers on a first date.

    Maybe go to a board game cafe instead and play some skill based games?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago

    Just a heads up, you're not ever actually locked in for any escape rooms I've ever done. You can just walk out at any time, being "locked in" is only part of the narrative, for safety reasons.

    That being said, you should always trust your gut and not have to worry about relying on strangers. Local places can also be pretty sketchy sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    This is a strategy Dennis shares with Charlie who tries it then forgets a step and proceeds to lose his shit and goes nuts trying to escape.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I think video games are a great way to get an idea of compatibility. I like Resident Evil 5 to gauge compatibility. I know it sounds silly but my ex-fiance was not a gamer yet we beat the game on the highest difficultly. We also had an easy time with Army of Two. The ex I had last, whom was a gamer, it was a thorough struggle. It's fun to see how well you work together even if it's a game.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -82 points 2 months ago (36 children)

    idiot

    Ableist.

    Eade the Nazi is probably correct.
    Who honestly take their 1st date at a trauma room‽
    My first day activities are normal things like libraries, canteens, playgrounds, theatres, parks, etc.. Escape room tests like these feel like 2nd base friends kinda materials.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    First date in a library? Nice place to get to know each other is a place where you have to be quiet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    Modern libraries have study booths you can hangout with others and be a tad loud as they have soundproof tech. As a bookworm myself, I want to learn what a partner likes to read, share our discoveries together, our musings, etc..
    We can also sign for when we need to be inaudible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    So now your gatekeeping dating preferences? It's a really weird you've chosen to die on here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    what‽ How in blazes is belittling people and vanguarding related‽

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    You're the one choosing to view it as belittling, that's your problem. It's an original, and perfectly valid dating option, it gives you a fun story to tell people, you get to know how each other think, and you have an objective which removes some social awkwardness if you don't know what to talk about.

    You should also probably not using terabang at the end of every sentence, I know that you're really proud that you figured out how to type it, but you're overdoing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Did we read the same tweets? ShesLaurenK is “gatekeeping” his dating pool by calling his first dates “idiots” and being unable to handle the pressure of being isolated with someone as digressive victimizer as himself.

    Eade at the least did some investigation to check if the tweet had any validity, to find out he’s been reverse his narrative, belittling the dates & the escape room staff.

    Also, read my bio once again, since it seems a grammarist has a preference on how I choose to express my shock reading non sequiturs in the 21c.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    You think "ShesLaurenK" with the woman in the profile pic is probably a guy rather than a woman named Lauren K? I'm curious as to why tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Does it really matter, when you see others as inferior to you? Surely the next date appreciates being belittled next time they go to an escape room.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    I'm just curious how you saw that name (and I know you did, because it was typed by you in the comment I replied to) and thought "Yup, 'She's Lauren K," that's definitely a male, gotta use his correct pronouns." Not exactly the logical conclusion to make there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

    Then read again, until you find the answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    The answer is you don't have one and want to pretend you do, that's on you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I did answer. How does Eade describe the person investigated dating in escape rooms?
    I am using her investigation as my reference.
    Notice ShesLaurenK doesn't pronoun themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    So, because the respondent has met someone before who also liked escape room dates but that person was male, that means everyone who likes escape room dates must then be male, and therefore OP must be as well?

    I've met women who like basketball, does that mean everyone who likes basketball is a woman?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You really don't like reading?
    Eade met with escape room staff to find out the tweet was real, and that tweet belong to a guy, not a gal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Uhh, no u. Where the hell are you getting that from the reply? That's an absolutely wild interpretation lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 2 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    This is really getting ridiculous. Last time i had someone tell me i am ableist after using ADD in a hypothetical scenario because the specific traits and challenges of ADD fit the situation too good to not use the term (and i used it because i seem to fulfill 9/9 medical criteria for ADD and it was simply the first thing i thought of because of my own experience with the symptoms)

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -26 points 2 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    I call myself idiot sometimes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Okay but I’m going to draw a line at actual slurs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    That's a personal choice.
    The handicapped still haven't reclaimed that term for you to belittle others with that term, or that of ShesLaurenK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Why do people like you not see a problem with acting like you get to speak for all handicapped people?

    Do you even a have a handicap?

    Does it make you feel powerful when you claim protector status for people who didn't ask for your help?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Stop speaking for me.

    You don't know me. You don't know my family. You are meaningless to me and mine.

    We have genetic retardation in our genes (I won't tell you what it is because it doesn't matter).

    It affects a few people rather extensively, we joke about how those of us who seem "normal" are still retarded.

    That's reality.

    You don't like that? Too fucking bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago

    we joke about how those of us who seem “normal” are still retarded.
    That’s reality.
    You don’t like that? Too fucking bad.

    So it's “normal” for you to belittle others with your conditions?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Sadly most people are fine with 'soft' ableism, and don't want to make the effort to change and get annoyed when it's called out.

    Some good sources for people wanting to use more accepting language:

    https://www.verywellmind.com/types-of-ableist-language-and-what-to-say-instead-5201561

    https://britthawthorne.com/blog/ableist-language/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Thanks for the links, I'll honestly try to adjust my vocabulary, but I have to admit it is difficult. Especially because it ultimately limits the expressiveness of what I want to say. All these words picked up new subtexts and meaning, distinct from their original roots, even if the roots are still there and are still hurtful.

    The sad truth is that prescriptivism, even the well-intentioned kind like his, almost never works. There needs to be a massive societal change before it can be normalized.

    Without this change to how people think, language will simply adapt and invent new slurs for the disadvantaged, same as how almost all those words picked up their ableist meanings e.g.

    • barren ← "bʰosós" (bare)
    • lame ← "h₃lemH-" (break/broken)
    • stupid ← "stupidus" (to be stunned, surprised, amazed) ← "(s)tew-" (push, hit)
    • removed (originally meant "delayed, slowed down") ←*wre (backwards)- + *terh₂ (pass)
    • crazy ← craze (to crush)
    • blind ← bʰlendʰ- (blend) [I'm not sure how this one happened TBH]
    • crippled ← *krupilaz (tending to crawl) ← *grewb- (crawl)
  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)