all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Does it really work on anything but Firefox these days?

They're supposed to be bringing native ad blocking to iOS, but I think it's only for influencers at this point — it's not in the public release. So the bloggers and YouTubers have it, which means the rest of us will get it... maybe someday. I guess depending on how much the hype brings in new users? I dunno.

On iOS, we have Wipr2, which is pretty good, but not free. Still, it works on YouTube videos, and it's reduced my reliance on apps. Any app with a ton of ads I can just browse to... app uninstalled, and I just browse to it in Safari. Some websites actually try to punish you for this (e.g. IMDb, and of course YouTube), but it's better than dealing with the ads.

Of course, when my Android phone is powered on, it's got the better browser. Full fat Firefox with extensions. Well, maybe not "full" fat, but it does have the extensions.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    uBO Lite is available on IOS. I can’t really tell how effective it is at this point though, because I use a combination of it + DNS filtering + Firefox Focus / DDG Browser + AdGuard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    As you should. So, I was in the TestFlight (beta) for uBlock Origin Lite. Like Adguard Pro (bought at 99¢, later went up to $10, now I think it's a subscription), Wipr2, and others, it only works for Safari. uBO Lite is a good place to start, and unlike the others I mentioned, it's free.

    When I used it, it did not block YouTube ads.

    You mentioned DDG. The DuckDuckGo browser DOES block YouTube ads. So that is another free solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • 44 comments in c/firefox@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 44 points 2 months ago (20 children)

    Firefox better stop with pushing AI and features that no one wants.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I was getting annoyed when they had a brief period where it seemed like every new feature was AI-related but they’ve calmed down on it a bit, thankfully. Just flip the no-AI toggle and still enjoy everything else they’ve done lately, like better HDR support, YouTube improvements, pdf tools, vertical tabs, containers, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    I mean you can just turn it off including future ones, no?

    And sadly, as much as I wish this weren't true, my 70y old mum I talked into Firefox does kinda make good use both of the translate feature and interestingly of the summarize. With age, she noticed she struggles with long texts, so she has the browser summarize it, checks whether it is what she actually wants to read, then later makes time to read it slowly with breaks.

    That's just 1 user, I know. Still, it gave me pause. I didn't think summarize in particular had a real use case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    All of the AI functions can be disabled with a single checkbox.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Still rather they spend the resources they spend on AI elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    And the ai be opt-in in the first place. I guess they know no one would enable it otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I maintain that AI features should have been an optional extension, not a mandatory baked-in feature that could have been accomplished with one.

    Especially because Mozilla isn't just devoting developer time to it, they have been pushing whole feature updates to these "optional" components inside bugfix releases

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Seriously, like, I have a Mozilla account for syncing but holy fuck it only syncs bookmarks. I have to fucking reconfigure every goddamn setting ever time I reinstall my OS or change laptops. It would be so goddamn easy to just send some fucking JSON to a server somewhere but no, they're coming up with new logos and mascots and AI bullshit. It's 2026 and I can't sync my settings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I use waterfox. But I also like pain.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    It's just too bad that Firefox is such a hog. Compared to many other browsers with the same use case it easily doubles memory usage, if not even more.

    Downvoter(s), care to elaborate? Is it illegal to note real world experience?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (17 children)

    It's too bad Firefox doesn't work best at anything some things

    Edit: I know there's a lot of Firefox fanboys, and I'm anti Google too, but ever time I try to use Firefox, it's broken in so many ways. They still haven't fixed the address bar on Linux after years

    Edit: I had a typo in my post, I meant to say "some things" not "anything". That's what I get for typing on a phone.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    ever time I try to use Firefox, it's broken in so many ways

    No it isn't.

    They still haven't fixed the address bar on Linux after years

    ...explain? Been using it for years and have never noticed a problem or difference versus Mac/windows/android versions.

    Edit: and no, it doesn't make me a fanboy to say any of this. I use Firefox every day and cannot really think of any way in which it's broken, let alone "in so many ways".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    They still haven’t fixed the address bar on Linux after years

    Maybe I'm not using the address bar on other browsers / OS's to its full potential, but what is the problem with Firefox's address bar on Linux?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Focusing the address bar opens a result pane - it's supposed to render under the address bar, but for some reason it renders overtop: https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/s/Fsqmy31fve

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    From the link:

    If someone gets into this discussion, I recommend that you simply comment out all the GNOME styles so that this does not happen again in the future.
    Just comment that line in your userChrome.css file
    import "firefox-gnome-theme/userChrome.css";
    You can found it here:
    /home/YOUR_LINUX_USER_NAME/.mozilla/firefox/YOUR_PROFILE/chrome/userChrome.css

    Seems to be userChrome.css doing that. Which would explain why I have never seen it but I do want to do custom CSS so this may pop up for me too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I've literally never seen that. That post is from years ago too so I'm far from convinced it was more than just a blip.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It's literally a known issue.

    Here, let me install Firefox fresh and see what happens. Yup, still there. So much for your "blip" theory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You're using an unusual desktop environment or something it would seem. Why haven't I seen that, ever, in several different distros and DEs? You truly are willing to call a software trash because it doesn't support a niche setup..?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You're using an unusual desktop environment Hyprland isn't niche. It used to happen on Gnome wayland as well, but I don't have any machines with it anymore.

    What do you get for being a pedantic ass arguing people's lived experiences on the internet? Seriously? Do you seriously feel butt hurt when someone has a bad experience with something you like, so you make it your life mission to attack and invalidate them? It's sad, just stop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    I'm not attacking a lived experience. I'm saying that you're wrong that Firefox is completely broken. It isn't. You revealed one thing that is arguably a bug. Instead of understanding that most people never experience that, you choose to spout off and invalidate millions of hours of effort toward a more open Internet. This one thing that literally might not even be a Firefox problem doesn't mean it's entirely broken, even if it is 100% a FF bug.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Ah yes, disagree-ers are silly "fanboys" who use Firefox despite how absolute trash it is. I just have to use chrome I really don't have a choice :(

    What distro are u running? Are u trying to rice it out or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I just realized now this is the Firefox community, so I deserve my downvotes.

    I tried switching to Firefox several times, but buggy address bar, performance, features, lack of extensions, and dev tools kind of all played into me not using it.

    I'm running Hyprland, and before I was on Gnome (wayland). I'm not doing anything to the browser, I like things vanilla. I just need tab hibernation that works, a page monitor extension (distill), workspaces, and dev tools that work well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments