all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I’m skeptical that this is a win, I think just means Linux will be “DRM’d” from using any services that require age verification.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Further, this is temporary. Anyone wanting to skirt the law will just use Linux, and eventually there will be a lot of public cases and this loophole will be closed with all the institutional support Microsoft, etc., can muster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    No, anyone wanting to skirt the law will say they are an adult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require "commercially reasonable" verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks. Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, who authored the bill, said this "avoids constitutional concerns by focusing strictly on age assurance, not content moderation," in a press release. The bill passed both chambers unanimously, 76-0 in the Assembly and 38-0 in the Senate."

    This is legitimately hilarious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Awesome good to hear!

  • source
  • 99 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    69 comments in c/opensource@lemmy.ml view that post
    51 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    49 comments in c/linux@lemmy.ml view that post
    30 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    9 comments in c/OpenSource@europe.pub view that post
    3 comments in c/opensource@programming.dev view that post