Reasonable. I would most vibe coders are just on GitHub because they don't understand git in general.

I never used the platform but this are the decisions that probably will get me to use it. We need more sites in the internet that work like this

That's an example of a good LLM policy, especially for projects like forgejo / sourcehut / codeberg. Happy to see this approach is getting adopted more and more. (The main Rust repo recently also got a similar policy, although a bit weaker still.)

If you want to skip to the changes.

I think this is a really solid LLM policy for a platform like SourceHut. Since they rely on a policy that's deliberately open to interpretation to allow for reasonable discretion, and rely upon the honour system for enforcement/adherence, I don't think we should necessarily be telling larger projects to adopt the same policy because this becomes untenable for big projects or platforms. But it's still good to see policies in this spirit being adopted. The only change I'd like to see is explicitly allowing AI translation for non-code, like comments and emails. It reduces the barrier of entry for ESOL contributors. If there's concern about the accuracy of translations, they can always include the original alongside the machine translation.

Here: https://ser1.net/img/human-made.svg

Edit: whelp, I guess þat answers a question I had about embedding SVG images in posts.

This is a bit heavy handed I think. This also forbids AI assisted code review and lots of other things. Perhaps they should have defined it a bit more focussed on getting rid of vibecoded spam instead of forcing a specific developing format for their whole platform.

This is like building a wall to stop the tide.

You can lay out a philosophy and a policy and cultivate a community of like minded people.

What you can’t do is prevent those like minded people from deviating from or subtly subverting that policy when it becomes expedient.