Maybe it’s a nitpick, but it’s annoying having to get on road just to walk pass it.

all 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 2 months ago

Why aren’t they getting towed?

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    Wow what terrible design 😬

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's not a nitpik ! We should stop to be so compliant with bad biaviour.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Whenever cars obstruct sidewalks, I think about how it affects disabled people.

    How does it affect a person in a wheelchair? A sight-impaired person? A person who has difficulty walking but is forced to park further away?

    You're right, it's never nitpicking to complain about a person who parks on a sidewalk, or even about a person who partially obstructs a sidewalk, for example, with a massive trailer hitch on their massive eyesore of a pickup truck.

    These people might be making somebody else's day much more difficult and stressful, in exchange for saving themselves a few seconds of walking. It's pathetic and it's the actions of a sociopath.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Walk over the top. Leave footprints so that they learn from their mistake.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    A ticket would be better than potentially getting into trouble for damaging somebody's car. Call the police or whoever is responsible for things like this in Your country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Just walk over it?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    100%

    I will put deodorant on the door handles of a car that does this. Unacceptable.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    If not car park, why car park shaped?? (everything is car park shaped if you're car brained)

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (29 children)

    The sidewalk should really be a different material than the road and be labeled, that looks like a parking spot.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (28 children)

    It's a different colour and raised. It's clearly not a parking spot.

    Edit. Proof below if anybody else doubts that this is clearly a sidewalk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago* (27 children)

    It’s the same colour, and it doesn’t appear raised in the image.

    Op needs to take a better picture showing the issue, because this image makes it look like a perking space. Not helping make their case.

    All the other spots have the same different curb material leading into the spot, they did a really good job blending that sidewalk in. Asking for this to happen.

    The raised curb just looks like a pained line denoting the stall from here. It could be a handicapped stall.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago* (18 children)

    It's yellow. And You can see the edge bricks. And You can clearly see it's raised on the next row.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 2 months ago* (16 children)

    You can see from the left part where it meets the road it’s the exact same color of the road.

    The sidewalk and road are identical material and colour. Where are you seeing yellow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Are You trolling or do You have a bad phone screen or are You colour blind?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago* (10 children)

    You said there’s yellow, there is absolutely none in the image, can you provide an image so we can see what you think you see? Funny you resort to insults instead of providing an image to show what you’re taking about.

    The materials for the sidewalk and road are identical, not even close to yellow, I provided an image as proof and to show you what I see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

    Unnecessary red circle

    This is a different color. It's a similar brick but rotated 90° from the road and clearly not the same color...

    The other photo also had different color brick for the walk path compared to the road. You may genuinely be color blind, friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    It is a very slightly different color, but definitely hard to make out in the original image due to the line of shade coinciding with the colour shift + being from further away. Definitely wouldn't blame a small-screen user for not noticing a difference between those two.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -20 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    That’s not yellow for one thing…. The road already has multiple shades already. You expect someone to think a fourth shade should be different?

    That’s not a different colour, just a different shade.

    They say the colour difference makes it obvious, how can it when there’s already multiple in roadway? It could if you ignore the other details around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    The fact that the sidewalk's pavers are rotated 90° compared to those in both the parking lot aisle and (more importantly) the parking space to the right is also enough to prove the designer's intent, even disregarding the color difference entirely.

    I totally agree that said designer shouldn't have let aesthetics come at the cost of accessibility, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    @hOrni@lemmy.world, be nicer. This is a warning.

    @plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works... I hate to say it, but he's not wrong to question your screen and/or vision. The difference in color is subtle, but it's there. I wouldn't necessarily call it "yellow;" more like a beige/tan for the walkway vs. gray for the parking lot. At any rate, it's enough to be clear (to me, at least) that it was intended to be a contrasting color.

    Here's what I ended up with when I used GIMP's eyedropper tool on the two areas:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Dear internet person, I think you may suffer from some form of color blindness.

    Paste the exact image you shared into MS paint or any image editor and extract color codes from the two parts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

    Good lord, they are a poster on Lemmy not a journalist. Between the photo and their words, I believe them and see the wrong. It isn't some takedown piece in a major newspaper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    So people can’t discuss how this mistake could easily be made…?

    Does that upset you for people to say the parking lot is actually designed terribly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    By mistake, do you mean the photo taken? I'm referring to how you said the poster should take better pictures to prove an already very obvious point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    The only indicater, the raised curb, is hidden behind the vehicle, everything else they show looks exactly like the other stalls.

    It’s not obvious, if it was, the person probably would not have parked there…. Now would they….?

    And where I live sometimes handicapped stalls are separated by a curb, so… not obvious the curb even means anything anyways.

    So yes, a better picture to show the actual issue would be nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It’s not obvious, if it was, the person probably would not have parked there…. Now would they….?

    You're giving them the benefit of the doubt. Others are arguing they knew and didn't care. Either way it's wrong. Could it have been designed better? Yes. Would that stop people who still don't care? No.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago*

    Yes, why shouldn’t I? It’s a terribly designed parking lot. And its also fun to have a discussion, except when people sling insults at someone else. The discussion can help people learn, or see stuff they didn’t before. This parking lot fails basically every current “good design practice”.

    If you’re gonna make your point that “it’s obvious”, well than it better be actually obvious, like with a sign or differing colors and material. Of course people can see how it’s not a spot, but it’s also just as easily seen as one.

    I get this is fuckcars, but atleast don’t completely have your head in the sand that the cars and drivers are solely to blame. Sometimes the designers just fucking suck, like in OPs picture.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Why would you red out their license plate?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Oops, my hand slipped that happend to hold my keys

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    Needs a bollard

    Maybe you can find a big broken concrete block and put it in the middle.

    Maybe if you find some yellow ribbon trash you can tie it to the block too.

    All is solvable for free from trash

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It looks like Poland. Drivers looove to do that shit here.

  • source