Maybe it’s a nitpick, but it’s annoying having to get on road just to walk pass it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -19 points 2 months ago* (16 children)

You can see from the left part where it meets the road it’s the exact same color of the road.

The sidewalk and road are identical material and colour. Where are you seeing yellow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Are You trolling or do You have a bad phone screen or are You colour blind?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago* (10 children)

    You said there’s yellow, there is absolutely none in the image, can you provide an image so we can see what you think you see? Funny you resort to insults instead of providing an image to show what you’re taking about.

    The materials for the sidewalk and road are identical, not even close to yellow, I provided an image as proof and to show you what I see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

    Unnecessary red circle

    This is a different color. It's a similar brick but rotated 90° from the road and clearly not the same color...

    The other photo also had different color brick for the walk path compared to the road. You may genuinely be color blind, friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    It is a very slightly different color, but definitely hard to make out in the original image due to the line of shade coinciding with the colour shift + being from further away. Definitely wouldn't blame a small-screen user for not noticing a difference between those two.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -20 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    That’s not yellow for one thing…. The road already has multiple shades already. You expect someone to think a fourth shade should be different?

    That’s not a different colour, just a different shade.

    They say the colour difference makes it obvious, how can it when there’s already multiple in roadway? It could if you ignore the other details around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    The fact that the sidewalk's pavers are rotated 90° compared to those in both the parking lot aisle and (more importantly) the parking space to the right is also enough to prove the designer's intent, even disregarding the color difference entirely.

    I totally agree that said designer shouldn't have let aesthetics come at the cost of accessibility, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    @hOrni@lemmy.world, be nicer. This is a warning.

    @plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works... I hate to say it, but he's not wrong to question your screen and/or vision. The difference in color is subtle, but it's there. I wouldn't necessarily call it "yellow;" more like a beige/tan for the walkway vs. gray for the parking lot. At any rate, it's enough to be clear (to me, at least) that it was intended to be a contrasting color.

    Here's what I ended up with when I used GIMP's eyedropper tool on the two areas:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Dear internet person, I think you may suffer from some form of color blindness.

    Paste the exact image you shared into MS paint or any image editor and extract color codes from the two parts.

  • source
  • parent