all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 91 points 2 months ago (6 children)

So we're ignoring "I a'm"?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    God I hated questions like this in school. There's always something specific the teacher is looking for, but nothing to point you towards it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm thinking maybe "Because if you subtract 40 from my number you get a negative number," but I could be either over- or under-thinking it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Yeah, I always felt like I was either pointlessly restating the obvious or it expected me to derive the damn thing from first principles.

    AI slop proof, just because I was curious if duck.ai could do it

    Using the natural numbers defined from 0 by the successor operation S:

    1=S(0), 2=S(1), ... , 20=S^20^(0), 40=S^40^(0)

    Define a < b to mean that there exists a natural number k such that

    a+k=b.

    Take a=20 and k=20. By repeated addition,

    20+20=40.

    Since 20 is a natural number, there exists a natural number k such that

    20+k=40.

    Therefore, by the definition of the ordering relation,

    20<40.

    (Is it correct? Fuck if I know!)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Because that's how numbers work, duh.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    What's the expected answer? "Because 2 is less than 4"? Could be "because 20 + 20 = 40" but that seems to be too advanced for these types of tests.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Lazy quiz questions were the bane of my education.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    "Because I paid attention to my teacher."

    That should do it.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    The teacher is probably looking for something like "Because 40-20 is positive".

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    "Because 20 - 40 is negative."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    "Because ln(20/40) is negative."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Because the set of numbers including 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 contains a greater amount of numbers than the set of numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    This has to be the most useless red circle I’ve ever seen.

  • source
  • I was soooo expecting a picture of Trump under that post title.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Because I could eat 20 cookies, but 40 is too many. And that's terrible.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I a'm smart t o'o!

  • source