all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I feel like if you were going to eat jewellery, you probably aren't making it very far anyway. It's only a matter of time before you taste toilet cleaner or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Real talk though… a baby in a person’s arm will totally put a locket or chain the person is wearing into its mouth.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago

    From the image it looks like they're in resin. I agree that people should be careful with jewelry around small children, but it doesn't look like these are the type that will open and spill out their contents, regardless of it the contents are poisonous or not. I feel like there would be bigger concerns if the baby bit a chunk of resin off. Maybe I'm mistaken though since I'm just going off the pic provided.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It’s like when we had to remind people that eating Tide pods is a bad idea.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Can we be sure if anyone actually ate them? Articles were written, sure, but IIRC there were a ton of people posting about it sarcastically and that got reported as true

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    You also shouldn't drink water. Did you know that stuff is in window cleaner?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The dihydrogen monoxide lobby wants you drinking 8 glasses worth per day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It should come with a warning to keep it away from kids and pets though

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    About as safe as American lettuce.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Did they look at the wrong definition of a "consumer"?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*