This is a very serious question. Since what we usually refer to as "weight" is actually mass if we use weight-loss drugs are we technically using weapons of mass destruction? :3c

all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 57 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Using the law of conservation of matter and extending your own logic, matter (mass) can never be created or destroyed, only transformed, so weapons of mass destruction don't exist.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Nuclear bombs do a pretty good job of destroying mass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    That's mass distribution, possibly state alterations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I can't believe the people replying to me...

    Einstein is famous for E= mc^2 . That's literally the equation that describes how much energy you get from destroying mass. It's the core of why nuclear power produces so much energy. A tiny tiny amount of mass is converted directly to energy. Mass gone. Energy here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Fwiw, I was just just trying to be funny, and I think many, myself included, are thinking about the results of setting off such a bomb and the effect it would have on the surrounding mass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    Mass reduction

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    Deciding if this belongs here or in Dad's jokes 🧐

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Nope. They don't destroy the mass, just move it away from your body

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    The ones that suppress appetite by reducing the intake of new mass so less of the prior mass is replaced as part of the normal bodily functions. The drugs themselves don't remove anything.

    Laxatives move the mass away from the body.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Fun fact, most of the weight you lose is exhaled through your lungs :3

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    They’re weapons of ass reduction

  • source
  • [+] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    The "mass" in "mass destruction" is referring to the quantity of the destruction, not what is being destroyed.

    The definition of mass being used in this context is an "a large quantity, amount, or number"

    Think of it like, "massive destruction"

    So, you'd have to be thinking of an amount of weight loss beyond what anyone has seen before.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Another question, should we be using weight loss drugs when we're already concerned about the amount of carbon being released into the atmosphere?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Everyone should get fat as a carbon sink? Maybe, if at the end we can have natural burial, but if we are cremated isn't it all going to be released into the air anyway?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Everyone should get fat as a carbon sink?

    Now that is something. If everyone in the world just put on 10kg we'd lock up about 83 mega tones of carbon. Then we just need to bury people in a way that gets that carbon locked up on the ground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Ridiculous. This would violate the law of conservation of mass. WMDs are not physically possible.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Weapon of mass reduction.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    noooo noooo

    WMD's are in the middle east only

  • source