all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I thought the (most expensive) Pixels are high end flagships?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I wish there was a budget, say 200 Euros, phone that supported grapheneOS. I never buy a more expensive phone than that, as I find phones in that price range more than enough...

    Also, fuck the size of today's phones. They are way too big.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I really wish Graphene OS worked on other phones.

    My current daily driver is an HMD Skyline also have a Motorola, Sony Xperia and a Nokia Android from 2017-2018 with a shattered screen but might still be repairable and can be used as is but none are listed as compatible.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Because they don't have the TPM lock they want for enhanced security. It's a nonstarter for GrapheneOS devs and the reason only now they're starting to branch out. However they mentioned literally Qualcomm by name integrating it on their latest elite series, so I'm thinking more devices might be compatible in the future?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Could somone ELI5.

    When discussing other ROMs I was told ROMs would be dead given that need to keep android open. I took that to mean micro G and many, many, other apps would break due to Devs unwilling (or unable?) to support non play store apps.

    How then would gOS continue, especially with a hardware partner? I understand the Google lockdown is upstream so gOS will be in the same boat, with things Accrcent (store) and Vanadium.

    Thanks.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (9 children)

    There are basically 3 types of OSs out there:

    • Google-approved android (these come with Google apps, and most importantly Google services, which are basically what is going to BD doing the blocking for the cause Keep Android Open is concerned about. Google services already has some additional attestation stuff in, which many banks use, which only work if you've got a stock google-approved OS)
    • Non Google approved android (generally based on AOSP which is the actually open source code Google publishes for android, these don't come with google services so they fail the play store attestation, generally people will be needing microg to use stuff like YouTube, which is basically a light google services replacement)
    • Graphene OS (it gets its special category because it sandboxes apps so you can use Google services apps in a way that doesn't give them access to the rest of your system and therefore shouldn't be able to mess with what you want to install, best of both worlds but it's not foolproof).

    There are a few other projects like /e/ but that's just AOSP with a coat of paint, graphene is a much more substantial change to how your phone locks down app access.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    So does microG work good enough to run banking apps? That's really the big question for most I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Not really cause you need to patch those apps to support microg instead afaik, at least you do with YouTube, and banking apps probably have ways to check if they've been meddled with.

    To expand on that if you're curious, there are afaik 2 types of attestation to verify it's a safe device, device attestation (which checks for a locked bootloader and some specific fingerprints), this is safe to fake for custom roms. The other one is the one i mentioned done through the software side with Google play services and such. That's impossible to fake currently (afaik, been a minute since I could install a custom rom).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yes. But the dev lockout stuff that Google is forcing will apply to all three. As I understand it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    It works through the Google play services afaik so it won't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Thanks.

    It seems that

    The rule only kicks in on devices that come loaded with Google's own apps and services, known as Google Mobile Services or GMS.

    That said, LineageOS flagged one gap worth watching which is if someone sideloads a third-party Google Apps package onto their device, that package could theoretically include the verification system bundled in

    I wonder of we'll see more banking (and other) apps lockout ROMs that don't have GMS, or bundle it in when installed on something like gOS.

  • source
  • parent
  • 45 comments in c/android@lemdro.id view that post
    [–] 46 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    I guess Im the only one who would prefer cheaper phones. Midrange with a jack is far more appealing to me than some flagship.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Totally with you. For me a perfect phone consists of:

    • Big Ass Battery (BAB) (Also make it changeable, so i can bring one with me and "charge" it in a second)
    • Headphone Jack
    • USB-C (Obviously)
    • 60Hz Display (Once you look at 120Hz you can never go back so I dont want to, also it drains battery)
    • microSD-Card (You can change, maybe with support to up to 1 TB just for funsies)
    • 4G (It is more than enough. 5G also drains your battery)
    • One Camera (Honestly still not over how goofy those 2+ camera sets look, they are even on cheaper phones nowadays)
    • Latest Security Patches
    • Normal sized and light (Have to be able to reach the top with one hand.)

    I just want phones to last longer than a day again :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    I disagree with this one

    4G (It is more than enough. 5G also drains your battery)

    You'll need to upgrade again if/when the network support changes. I'd prefer that it was future proofed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    My dream phone would be similar, but with 5G and the usual larger size (imo the tradeoff is worth it in my case).

    It would also have a silicon carbon battery to have the huge capacity, and most importantly a CPU limiter in the OS to stop it from eating up power by constantly turboing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Once you look at 120Hz you can never go back so I dont want to

    Too late for me. My current phone has 165 Hz (Motorola Edge 40 Pro) and I don't want to go back to a mere 120, let alone 60.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Yea, have 120Hz on my Desktop Monitor since 2016 and am now stuck with it myself, weirdly enough I still don't miss it on my phone as my brain just does not expect it there.

    You probably could trick your brain and just reduce it 1Hz at a time?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    You will never get a phone likes this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    ...Unless you go for Fairphone 6 Plus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    There are multiple points which the FP6+ does not meet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Which ones exactly? And are they bad things to lack rather than minor preferences? I'm pretty sure it has both the front and back camera, so I guess it doesn't meet the one camera priority.

    maybe it's the headphone jack? is that really important?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Way to ruin somebodies hopes and dreams. :(((

    Have the Pixel 3A which gets pretty close. Does not have swappable Storage and only the latest security patches as there are still, what feels like, two random people backporting security patches as its not officially supported by LineageOS. Not sure how long that will last.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Yeah, especially for modern phones. What good does the more powerful hardware do me? I don't do anything on my phone where I need more processing power. A higher quality screen is nice, but all modern phones have screens that are of a high enough resolution to not matter. Just give it a larger battery and I'm good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That seems concerning, considering I haven't seen Motorola make a "flagship" phone in years, and the newest Pixel historically hasn't exactly been a "cheap" phone (like Motorola normally makes). It seems like they are just prepping the public for it to be scary expensive. :/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    That seems concerning, considering I haven't seen Motorola make a "flagship" phone in years

    don't they have their signature series,

    I am using a Moto Razr 50u flip, and the have Fold phones as well.

    let down by the years of support. I am. surprised Google. doesn't lean on them. about no Graphene phones though

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    We need CHEAPER GrapheneOS phones, not more expensive!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    And I want WAY more people using Graphene. I want a 'herd immunity' effect where we can starve the virus that is unlawful state surveillance. That won't happen if truly affordable devices aren't available.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Im OOTL on this one. Am I reading this right; GraphineOS is pushing out their own devices, pre-loaded with GraphineOS? Or just 'GraphineOS ready' devices, with some generic Android preinstalled?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago

    They've partnered with Motorola to make phones officially compatible with GrapheneOS, we apparently don't know yet if the phones will come preinstalled with it tho

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The upcoming Moto devices won’t ship with GrapheneOS, but they will be fully supported by the project with help from Moto itself.

    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/08/motorolas-grapheneos-phones-will-launch-in-2027-priced-higher-than-pixels/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    So they are preparing us to pay higher prices than one of the most popular phone companies flagship phones? Sounds like it's already bound to fail. Not many people are willing to pay more while they can get pixel for less and flash grapheneos.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Take the AI out of a pixel and what have we got? A secure mid range phone.

    What is this going to do better than a flagship?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah but pixels are actively fucking with sources for pixels now.
    You also can't trust Google not backdooring hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    I was thinking last night about how i’d like to have a GrapheneOS e-ink phone.

    It would be cool to have a device that’s private and has my favorite type of screen.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    bad news is lenovo overprices phones. good news is most of them get cheap fast cause noone buys them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Im not going to be able to get friends and family to make the switch then. My next device will probably be another refurbished Pixel.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago

    Yeah I like that

  • source