Edit: Guys, I get it. I made a linguistical error. You don't have to keep telling me.

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 122 points 2 months ago (11 children)

“Most” would imply more than half which is not true of China or India.

“Most people are Asian,” would be true.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I really wish this went for more than two seasons

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    The definitions you link all include a meaning of “most” that is “a majority of”. Context matters.

    “China has the most people.” Here it means the greatest quantity.

    “Most people are Chinese.” Here it means a majority of people are Chinese.

    That’s just how English works.

    Also, India has the most people, not China.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Me and my wife (both Caucasians) were expecting a baby. I called my brother with the news. His reply?

    Brother: "Don't be surprised if the baby is Chinese."

    Me: ...?

    Brother: "Well, 25% of all babies are Chinese, bro"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago

    Despite being true

    Um, no? Even assuming you mean Chinese ethnicity as opposed to residency, “most” implies majority, not plurality.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    This thing that I totally made up, and is not true, sounds weird 🤔

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    The whole concept of a majority is a bit weird. So, let's say you have a bunch of groups that are about 0-1% of the total, but one group is 2%. That makes it the largest group, but it isn't really what people mean when they talk about majority. What if the largest group was 40% of the total, and all other groups are much smaller than that. Is that still a majority, even if it's still less than half of the whole? If it's over 50%, then it's pretty clear we're talking about a majority.

    Same thing with minorities. What if the smallest group takes 20% of the whole pie? That's not an insignificant group, but it's still technically a minority since the other groups are larger than that.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    It's not true.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    What's the definition of "most?" 90%? 80%?

    If one looks at it, PRC+ROC's population is only around 1.4 billion, which is only around 16.8%

    If one adds in chinese diaspora, which is 60-70 million, that is still less than 18% of the world's population

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I think the intented phrasing wanted to say out of all nationalities that would be probabilistically the most true if assuming for a truly random human on Earth, except even that's not true anymore, that would go to India.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    You (Angry Rant by Mattias Pilhede)

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)