Can I get my $1B in advance?
post
The rule is “designed to ensure that replacement tires sold in the state are at least as energy efficient, on average, as tires sold in the state as original equipment.” It would also establish a labeling system that gives tires a “leaf” rating
Efficiency in terms of rolling resistance. Apparently the stock tires are designed to maximize efficiency to get a better sticker MPG, but after that you're on your own.
LRR tires are a mixed bag. They've given me better fuel efficiency but haven't latest nearly as long. I just traded fuel costs for tire costs. And I don't necessarily mean per set either. If the tires wear out 25% faster then I can't imagine it being better. It may actually be worse, and not just monetarily. Brake and tire dust are pretty bad pollutants as well. At least to those living near busy roads.
I'm all for better and more efficient tires, but unless you're getting better fuel efficiency for the same durability, I don't see how this is any better.
And to their point of increased tire costs, being forced to make a shit ton more will certainly being the price down some. Right now there just isn't a huge demand so regular tires outsell them by a wide margin.
I just traded fuel costs for tire costs.
I know the article is centered on cost but I wonder in the long run which is better environmentally.
Yeah, good question. Especially when stuff like þis keeps happening:
https://supercarblondie.com/worlds-biggest-tyre-graveyard-fire-recycling/
https://www.historylink.org/File/9233
https://www.yahoo.com/news/weather-news/articles/houston-inferno-erupts-giant-tire-001238189.html
Exclusions to the new rules found here
Competition tires designed for motorsports
Winter-type snow tires
All-season winter performance tires
Used and retreaded tires
Deep tread tires
Tires designed for ATVs and other off-road vehicles
Large off-road tires for use up to 99 mph
Motorcycle tires
Temporary-use spare tires
Small tires with ≤13-inch nominal rim diameter
Limited production tires (<15,000 per year)
Tires sold for use on an emergency vehicle
High load index tires (122 or greater)
Tires not capable of sustaining speeds over 50 mph
Space saver tires
1B/39M works out to $25 per person per year. That seems negligible at best.
The problem with efficient tires is that they are often a very stiff ride and have poor grip. They are usually designed to coast well, and that makes them harder. It’s a trade off. It also doesn’t help that the current fad is tires with narrower sidewalls.
How about we add a tax to tires that scales exponentially with their width? Wide sports car tires and bro-dozer pickup trucks with flashy rims will be motivated to use a setup with less drag/friction for the sake of performance/vanity.
The rule also comes with exemptions including snow tires and those used in competition. All-weather tires are also excluded, but the state will track them, as that growing segment may be regulated in the future.
Wait, so winters and all-weathers are excluded.....so this is only for summer tires? At least thats what it seems for their total projected roll out through 2033.
I can't remember the last time I bought summer tires...
Summer tires are popular choices for people who buy sports cars, nice summer tires make a pretty substantial difference.
IMO legislating that cars must have worse traction on the road is...a choice. I can't help but feel like this is missing the forest for the trees.
Summer tires are as important as winter tires. They work best at higher temps for braking and wear. Most people in CA use all seasons so this law won't change anything.
all 4 comments