Also if they write 210° it's an angle not a temperature
post
That kind of thing brings my blood to 100°.
I would expect it to be a bit higher than 100° what with all the non-water stuff in there.
In international context the International System of Units must be used. So the ° is wrong it's 'K'. You have to put the cookies in a ice/salt mixture or better frozen CO2
That would be ideal but honestly I don't mind too much if someone just uses the °F or °C, i can convert it easly, it's annoying if they don't use any unit at all tho and expect me to just guess
As with everything, we know it's all the Americans' fault. Joking. Halfway, anyway - they are a majority of the people who, internationally speaking, wanted to be all precious about this stuff. Although even if they didn't, it'd still seem like "good practice" to include units anyway, though.
The cooking does tend to just be context, though, or at least "same as all the other recipes". There's only so many sane temps to pick for any given thing, and there's a factor of ~2 between the two choices. E.g. if you were baking, 210° is either pretty hot or way too cool for most things.
An unspoken rule of the Internet: If a post doesn't specify country, units, server, or time zone, and that information is relevant, then it was written by someone who is unaware of those things. You know, Americans.
I get what you're saying, but a realistic temperature for cooking only makes sense if you're familiar with cooking. I'm sure there was someone who was wondering why their cookies weren't cooking at 175° F or utterly annihilated them at 350° C. It's just a couple extra characters, anyway.
Sure. As I said, it makes sense to just... not be ambiguous. As for familiarity, I don't think you really need it? You'll have an inkling of where the recipe came from and be 90% sure most of the time. If not, searching for one more recipe means it's suddenly really unlikely to still be unclear. No matter what you want you could search for non-US units to rule out/convert.
Familiarity would mean it's even easier, you'll go "of course this is baked at around 175°C like virtually all the other things like it" and almost certainly be right. Although baking is notoriously finicky...
Can I hijack this to complain about small town newspapers that don't specify the state? There are 88 cities, states, counties, or districts named "Washington". Is it so hard to clear up which one youre talking about?
No one is cooking something in an oven at 180f nor 350c
Same is true when people tell you their local time and not their time zone.
Why do you need their time zone if you know their local time? You'll either be in the same time zone as them, or in one that you can reference your time to theirs.
My local time is 1705 right now, doesnt help much, its better if I say 1705 CEST...but it helps way more to say that Im 1705 UTC+2
I’m in a global group. Someone reaches out to me and tells me they’re free at 6. Wtf does that mean? 6 what?
Considering that most cookie recipes are usually at 170c or 350 f to 204c or 400 f, surely you can figure that out from context?
Especially since certain chemical reactions only begin to happen at the low side of that. For example the Maillard reaction enhances the flavor of sugars and such; or double acting baking powder (as well as greatly accelerating the reaction of single acting powder, soda or cream of tartar.)
Low temp ovens would just dry out that cookie or biscuit into dog treats.
Considering that most cookie recipes are usually at 170c or 350 f to 204c or 400 f, surely you can figure that out from context?
Well that was mostly an example, i never made cookies so i just said a random number
Especially since certain chemical reactions only begin to happen at the low side of that. For example the Maillard reaction enhances the flavor of sugars and such; or double acting baking powder (as well as greatly accelerating the reaction of single acting powder, soda or cream of tartar.)
Well, i am not a chemist, i just know a handful of stuff that i can use in everyday life, eg: using hydrogen peroxide to remove blood stained on clothing
Don’t even get me started on the yanks thinking cups is an acceptable measurement of both weight and volume.
And how big are we talking? Espresso cup or sports direct mug, because there’s a massive difference.
I'm not from the US and don't use it, but a cup there is an actual measurement (for liquid - it's not used to measure weight). 8 fluid ounces or about 240ml. The metric alternative of a US cup is 250ml
We don't measure weights in cups, but we do measure some ingredients (like flour) by volume, so it's not uncommon here to see a recipe that calls for 1 cup of flour instead of 120g
However, we do use "ounce" to mean both 1/8 of a cup in volume and 1/16 of a pound in weight....
Usually they mean the imperial unit "cup" i fucking hate imperial...also, it's annoying in this case because you have to guess that it's the imperial unit and not a random cup
To add insult to injury, a US cup is 236.6 millilitres, while a UK (imperial) cup is 170.48 millilitres. Not even close. There's a whole lot of other measurements called "cup" too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cup_%28unit%29
Nobody has ever read cooking instruction and thought "they mean for me to measure this with a mug from my cabinet" lol
No, but they’ve probably thought “what fucking size cup do these twats mean and why can’t they just put an actual measurement”.
I'll take your word for it. All of my measuring tools have cups on one side and mL on the other. Git gud scrub
However, in modern recipes, the US legal cup of 240 ml (about 8.45 British imperial fluid ounces or 8.12 US customary fluid ounces) is more commonly used.
I like how you just pulled that sentence out of context from the description for ONE country and ignored the dozen other countries with different measurements.
...
You literally pulled up a cherry picked list of where there are discrepancies. You're allowed to and im not?
Also, would you look at that: almost all of them have converged to US customary or 250mL, which is within the tolerance for error.
You literally pulled up a cherry picked list of where there are discrepancies.
The entire point of this thread from the comment you replied to, is that 'cup' is an inexact unit of measurement that varies. My list is providing examples, I'm not seeing the issue here.
You're allowed to and im not?
You were misrepresenting the statement as if it applied globally when in actuality it was meant for ONE country. That's just bad faith discussion.
Also, would you look at that: almost all of them have converged to US customary or 250mL, which is within the tolerance for error.
Except for Latin America, the UK, most of Asia, parts of Europe, etc. 🙄
all 54 comments