Second is clearly satire, first is batshit.

Why are people mistaking the second one (which is clearly a mockery of the original post) for an earnest post?

Fuck off. They're talking about cranking the value of a stock by a few cents by committing borderline criminal behavior like they're fucking visionaries. I am so sick of these people.

LinkedIn should just be a big honey pot to get people into therapy and community service.

I'm going to change the world by staring at Excel spreadsheets 24 hours a day. Who needs a family when you have Power Query and Pivot Tables?

/s

Just fucking die on the job, your a loser if you don't. Fuck your family, must lick the ceos boots.

Such a toxic lie

"They become equally important, perhaps even more so."

Her kids are not necessarily more important than her job. So if she ever has to make a decision between losing her job or her kids, it would be very difficult to choose. 🙄

I know who won't be visited by her kids when she is old.

Fun fact. Eva remained on a conference call while going into labor after hiding her pregnancy.

children are often happiest when they see their parents fulfilled, alive and deeply engaged with their own purpose.

Your children would have to actually see you for that, which they barely will with poor work-life balance. When they finally do, you're probably too exhausted to do something with them and be angry instead because of your exhaustion.

You have to remember a lot of investors are explicitly looking for human sacrifice believing it will help them get wealthier.

It helps put this post in context.

The richest and most priviliged people, the kind who never really had to struggle from nothing to something, gave takes like these.

Work does not make a man great

Was waiting for the final denouement that she works in a chip shop.

bet their kids love 'em.

you know, the two, three times a year when they spend time together lol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp42QPFLxtE&t=4657s

1h17m37s if the time stamp doesn't work.