Why would he assume it was for him? Unless he knows he has done something to warrant it.
When I see a gullotine, it doesn't make me nervous. Cause I know it's not for me.
His reaction is admission of guilt.
Why would he assume it was for him? Unless he knows he has done something to warrant it.
When I see a gullotine, it doesn't make me nervous. Cause I know it's not for me.
His reaction is admission of guilt.
If you see a guillotine and immediately assume it’s for you, maybe you should reconsider some life choices. Because the vast majority of people would see a guillotine and go “oh that’s fucking cool” instead of assuming it was there specifically for them.
CEO =
Cut
‘Ead
Off
"Suffer not the CEO to live" Exodus 22:18
Something like that, according to LLM translation from the original text. Who am I to question the machine spirit.
If there's anything we can depend upon, it's the Willamette Valley interdiction to meeting corporate greed, and I love it. Represent. I'm there.
Edit: it's a valley and not a velley. My phone is dumb, but apparently you guys get it.
LOL! Thank you France for developing an angled blade. Although the horizontal blade may not be a bad idea for the murdering bastards.
Allegedly it was originally horizontal and the angled blade was actually Louis XVI's idea. So, good on him for making his own death less painful I guess
Sorry, bit of an amateur here. What's the difference between the angled and straight blades? Besides the angling of course. Is one more efficient than the other?
Again, my apologies for my ignorance, most of my decapitations are done with chainswords.
EDIT: Everyone, thank you so much for the explanations. That's what I love, physics lessons alongside socio-political reformation!
think of cutting food in your kitchen. slicing cuts better than chopping. an angled blade is similar to a slicing motion.
really it's more that the cut starts at a smaller area than all at once.
I believe that an angled blade would create a more thorough cut as it's a smaller point of contact for cutting. So it'll cut through ligaments, maybe even vertebrae. Where as a flat one it is initially a small point that gets bigger which requires more force to go through the neck further.
This got me imagining a guillotine-ing that is narrated by the How It's Made people.
"A worker places the oligarch's neck in the correct position and then locks the top board in place."
Watch as the metal blade slices through the skin with supreme ease, then continues on through the main muscles of the neck etc?
My understanding is the angled blade introduces a force more like slicing and chopping at the same time
What is this? A guillotine for ants?
You're assuming it's for the big head.
Luigi, our prophet 🙏
I have a bike. I don't have a guillotine yet. New life goal unlocked!
Dude I used to live close to Salem. Way to go Salem. That’s so Salem of you.
"I Made a Guillotine That Only Works on Billionaires" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7Vho4G0wtc
For most billionaire CEOs, it would be closer to killing a serial killer. Still technically a crime, but most people wouldn't be upset about it. Especially considering that their decisions often kill more people than the average serial killer.
And no one would want to do that if the billionaires weren't on a quest to destroy society and the planet for a bigger high score.
There just isn't a way to amass that much wealth without harming a lot of people in the process.
Do billionaires ever get punished for crimes? Apart from Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire who managed a chidren raping ring apparently consisting of only 3 people: himself, his partner, and Prince Andrew, and no one else, based on current investigations and due process...
Wilhoit's law:
Conservatism consists of only one proposition:
"There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does lot bind alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
This is like expecting the king to persecute themselves in medieval times.
It's not even conjecture but actually proven - multiple times, even including through a scientific journal - that the ultra wealthy are the ones writing the law in the USA. Americans wouldn't see justice through the legal system. Heck their president has violated the law multiple times and gotten virtually nothing. That's not counting all the others who have broken the law and received no or virtually no punishment, like Elon Musk.
I'm not the person you're responding to, but if I did still live in the USA, my parents would completely understand, since they're from El Salvador originally and had to leave when the government there started the civil war and called the USA for backup in murdering people who just wanted to be paid enough to eat or be worked to death in the fields like one of my uncle's.
So good for you that you've lived such a cushy pampered life that you can even think the way you do. And pray that the building anger there, or wherever you may be, never boils over because of rising injustice. Because asshats like you will be included in the fires that break out. And unlike those who've suffered, you're nothing more than a weak sapling when hard times come, and your survival then will have been by chance if you are so lucky.
So go ahead, egg those people on. They're the ones more likely to be just fine when hell breaks loose. You only encourage your own misery when you try to push them further. Even places like Russia are starting to see their dues come in, so not even being a paid troll will be safe for long. Righteous fury is slow to build but impossible to stop once it explodes.
Law doesn't equal justice or protection for the average US citizen. If you're wealthy enough you can buy your way around the law in the US.
Billionaires aren't people, doesn't count as murder
Let's rephrase this as "billionaires are so much people, as the rest of the people are for them"
They're scum
They nave no human traits
No empathy
No common sense
No sense of community
No basic, barebones social skills
No sense of justice
No desire to make the world a better place
Locking people up is also a Nazi strategy, so are you a Nazi?
They are not a racial, religious or cultural minority. They can absolutely change their "group" anytime they wish.
They are people who continuously decide to harm others for their own benefit, and at their stage, the only benefit they can imagine is hoarding more and more wealth and use it to get more and more power.
And power they have, and they use against the rest of people.
No one became fascist by dehumanizing the fascists.
OP: doesn't like one specific group of people who do one specific thing.
Your stupid ass: yOu JuSt WaNt To SeE mUrDeR
I know reading is hard (for you) but damn
silly goose, it's not like they're actually going to guillotine him as trump rioters tried to hang mike pence.
I do want to see his head rolling. As history has taught us death of evil doers is good for society in general.
Few thousand years.
Dear, it still happens. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." is not even a point of discussion but a statement of a fact. Your so called thousands of years is less than a year from revolution in Nepal and around 40 years of fall of USSR in Europe; not to mention the regression is caused by oligarchs who have transformed US into a competitive authoritarianism. They must learn fear before civil war becomes the only remaining option.
Bro every time I see your name come up it’s downvotes
I don't think it's murderer if they attack first. At least in the states that's considered self-defense or stand your ground.
top 86 comments