post
The only mechanism I can identify Christopher Nolan using is loud sound effects and very quiet dialogue 😅
I'm sorry, what was that?
He really does not want parents watching his movies while the kids are asleep
The theater shook so hard in the Odyssey it was just vibrating everywhere. Slightly too much I'd say.
The Expanse method
Plenty of terrible shows with equally terrible sound editing and you pick a good show with passable sound editing? Go on I guess...
What sound setup did you use to watch it? This is an actual problem for me, because I want to watch it, but either can’t understand it or blow my eardrums out. I haven’t been able to find reliable versions with subtitles, which is my normal solution, so now I’m just super interested, but unable to understand it.
That’s why the subs are unreliable, lol. If I had it on dvd or bought it online, I hope they’d be included. But yeah, all of the options seem to either never load or have inaccurate/nonexistent subtitles. It’s actually to the point that I’m keeping an eye out in libraries for a copy, but I haven’t had any luck yet.
Streaming. I just choose a site from the piracy community list and watch there until it refuses to load, then move on to another. I haven’t found any of those sites to be better than the others though.
How do I know how the audio is encoded?
subtitles are not a good excuse for bad audio levels...
that said, i never had any issues watching the expanse...
I think it is from this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa4I8Ch2TRo
I see two sides to this argument.
On one hand, he is right: deconstruction is not a critique, and more people need to learn the difference.
On the other hand, when people present a deconstruction as critique, what they mean is that "your magic circle is too obvious, it no longer suspends my disbelief, I see what you are doing".
Imagine if he was talking about stage magic: "Knowing how the illusion works does not detract from prestige" - that is obviously false.
Film is always a lie by joyous definition, why are we so monomacially obsessed with trying to deny that with raw artificial fidelity employed as an instrument quantified in kilotons of spectacle?
I love CGI but I love heartfelt community theater more.
TL;DR bro have you even watched Hamnet?
I blame tech. The way it scales plays too well to the speculative nature of markets, and by infecting everything we do with itself, it turns these things into speculative commodities.
Practical effects are a craft, - they are only to be made and admired. Digital doubles can be canned, preserved and reproduced at scale with no friction. It's the theme of 21st century: sacrificing everything we love for the sake of convenience, while telling ourselves that only this convenience is love-worthy.
You see, you can't just "be" or "make" things anymore. Whatever you do, you can only do it in a way that makes money slide.
Everything is smooth in the frictionless world, especially disappointment.
Haven't seen Hamnet, thank you for the recommendation!
Bring back Tarkovsky.
If someone tells you all the “plot holes” they found in a movie they are not helping you decide if you’ll enjoy the movie, but just trying to score internet points.
Part of my enjoyment of a movie is that the plot maintains a level of consistency throughout. This generally requires a level of writing that most producers/directors aren't willing to spend money for. While some might be more aggressive in what they label plot holes or whatever, it's a reasonable metric that lots of complaints about plot holes is a good sign I won't like the movie.
Most of the time, people don't even know what a plot hole is though. A lot of times, it just means that the movie didn't explain a unimportant detail. I saw it when Rouge One came out and people were excited to "finally have the plot hole about how the vent shaft could have been included in the design of the Death Star".
It's more about the execution than the story itself. I'll readily suspend disbelief and ignore inconsistencies as long as the delivery is well made, like in Funny Games or Arrival
I swear, YouTube editorial wannabes have just utterly devastated media literacy and appreciation. Maybe not to the extent that 'second monitor' mentality and committe storytelling have, but they're definitely part of the larger problem.
People have really fallen into 'be told what to think, not how to think'.
The best thing thing about letterboxd is the shitposts. The "real" reviews feel kinda eh.
Amongst many other things, the way you can spot an imbecile is when they complain about “unlikeable” characters.
Kinda depend if the writer really want you to like the unlikeable character or not like them.
It’s a complaint that I really don’t understand. I would love for someone who hates movies with unlikable characters to explain it to me.
I’ve noticed it’s a complaint usually given by people who mainly watch action movies, e.g. my James Bond-loving uncle who didn’t like Marty Supreme because the main characters were unlikable. You’re supposed to admire and root for the main characters in action movies, but who says you have to feel the same way in other kinds of movies?
If that’s what makes me an imbecile, so be it (unless it was a joke about the spelling). I don’t think it’s bad to make unlikable characters, but I also don’t want to be around them for a couple hours of my limited free time.
Do you go around saying certain movies are bad because the characters are all unlikeable but can't explain how or why?
Because that's the kind of person they're talking about.
I wouldn’t say that, but I’ve probably complained about the likability of characters, which is what their initial comment criticized. I can’t get into It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, for example, because the main characters are all so awful, but I enjoy isolated clips.
Anyone else feel a bit offended by this in general?
Is it a problem? or is it just feedback that he is feeling sensitive about?
I really dislike it when groups/individuals who often court influence and dialogue to market but don't like it on the flip side. They have fed these ecosystems but bite back at the content that dismisses them. You want people to talk about your movie/music/show then simply accept you have no control over the direction and tone of the talk.
I wonder if he takes offense to amateur film advocates...or in general viewers? as i feel like these kinda statements make me feel like I am not allowed to share my opinion on his movies i watched.
He's clearly talking about people who broadcast opinions so uninformed that they don't know the difference between a problem and a trope.
Opinions aren't precious gems that need to be valued and protected. Not all opinions are valuable. In fact, most aren't. This used to be common understanding, along with "don't share your name on the internet", "you can't trust politicians", and "don't believe everything you read". All of these have been flipped around, for worse and now people are so attached to their takes and opinions that any challenge is an affront. There's no reason to be offended about opinions cobbled together in a few seconds not being valuable unless there is an irrational amount of pride and attachment involved.
So if your opinion is that pointing out a movie follows the Heroes Journey and that means it sucks, then Nolan is right. If it's not, then what is there to be offended about?
I don't know shit about this guy and haven't even seen the movie trailer...
...I just know for sure I hate the marketing and hype.
Do you not use an ad blocker? I don’t think I’ve seen a single ad. Apart from, like, movie posters. I actively avoid ads tho.
TBF marketing is not just direct ads. The constant articles or media arguments are still marketing. I might have wanted to see it before but all the discussions online about it put me off. the more something is pushed the less I like it.
All the discussions of iMax etc, I even got shown a music video made by the stars. I watched it to be polite but TBH i found it a bit cringe and i now have the feeling of go away already. I used to love cinema and movies. But marketing and hype just kills any passion i have now.
I still carry a grudge for the massive fuckup that was audio in Tenet.
Also there was some hubbub about this one being filmed on land that is being stolen by Morocco, so not great optics there either.
top 59 comments