1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 3 months ago

Does these work outside of Europe?

  • source
  • 32 comments in c/linuxphones@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    I find it impressive how negative people tend to be because something is not pure enough, they talk it down even much more than the duopoly systems. Yes, Sailfish OS has some closed source UI parts, and you can't just install desktop programs outside of the cli without running into problems. But running desktop programs, not optimised for mobile use are a terrible experience to begin with. This is a mobile device, not a desktop. If you disagree with that and want a desktop on your phone, there are options for you too, Sailfish OS isn't it though.

    That said, what surprised me most is how much I am in the terminal on the phone and enjoying it. You'd certainly not going to have that kind of experience on an Android, also not on a degoogled one.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    For everyone interested here is the official product page: https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-october-2026

    the 8GB/128GB version costs 649€

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

    Pretty expensive for a Linux phone that does not allow running most Linux apps.

    A Fairphone costs 549 € (100 euros less), for that you get 256 GB of storage, better specs, repairability and a wider range of mobile Linux distros to choose from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Thema advertising it as a Linux Phone is misleading imho. They should focus on advertising it as an alternative to Android/iOS with optional Android App support.

    But from a Hardware point of view you are right. It is not a flagship device. In regards to repairability at least the battery can be replaced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Replaceable Battery is just the legal minimum for the EU.

    I prefer repairability, we've got too much trash already and the planet isn't in a good state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Not necessarily for Smartphones and Tablets. There is an exception:

    manufacturers, importers or authorised representatives may provide the battery or batteries referred to in point (i)(a) only to professional repairers if manufacturers, importers or authorised representatives ensure that the following requirements are met:

    (a) after 500 full charge cycles the battery has, in a fully charged state, a remaining capacity of at least 83 % of the rated capacity;

    (b) the battery endurance in cycles achieves a minimum of 1 000 full charge cycles and after 1 000 full charge cycles the battery has, in a fully charged state, a remaining capacity of at least 80 % of the rated capacity;

    See: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R1670

    So If this requirements are met it does not need to be easily replacable by the End-User. Don't know If they can achieve that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    What is so bad about the repairability of the Jolla Phone? You can have a look at the teardown on ifixit. Seems pretty straight forward and modular. Sure, Fairphone is yet better, not so much because it is so much easier to take apart but because of how extensive their replacement part store is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Then get a Fairphone, that said, most of the people who have purchased the Jolla Phone have gotten 256 GB for 500-580 EUR. I personally got it for 580 EUR.

    Which one of those Linux distros on Fairphone is as daily driveable as a phone as Sailfish OS?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    You know just as well as me that a phone is daily drivable if it does what you need, which is highly subjective.

    I personally have used phones that wouldn't work at all for most.

    There are several options and people should look things up themselves and make sure the things that are important to them are supported.

    I cannot give you an easy, simple, short answer in a single post, but we could discuss this in audio for many hours, easily. Sometimes simple answers do not work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    How does it compare with the Murena gs6?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    It being proprietary is a nonstarter for me

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

    Also, no mainline kernel support. Pretty sure it'd be easy to do for Jolla (even I manage to do some mainlining work and I don't sell phones).

    This means it'll be a security nightmare at some point, just like any other phone.

    Plus the specific app format. You cannot install the many nice GNOME apps, KDE apps and others that already exist.

    I do have a SailfishOS phone for testing, but to make it even a bit useful I'd have to use AppSupport, which is Android in a container with a proprietary wrapper. There are barely any apps, they should leverage the power of the many mobile Linux apps that exist. I'd rather have some apps with a UI that looks different to the rest than not having what I need.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The app format lock in sounds crazy to me. How does it stop you from running other apps? Does it not have a terminal? Does it not give you sudo? Does it refuse to run any executables, or is it about the ui toolkit?

    Sorry for the barrage, that sounded outrageous

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    They just have their own format using their owm SailfishOS-specific UI libraries. Their apps don't work elsewhere without patching, there's no Flatpak and they only have SailfishOS apps in the repo.

    Sure, you can write your own apps, but I prefer using what's already there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    There is no lock in, there are merely incompatibilities. You can install sudo, but by default there is devel-su which is pretty much the same thing. You can install rpms and if you don't like pkcon you can install zypper as package manager. As long as you stay within the terminal emulator things tend to work.

    There is a misunderstanding that desktop programs would be such a great boon for a mobile phone. But mobile phones suck with desktop UI. You need a mobile UI for it to make sense and that is exactly where incompatibilities are coming from.

    I installed a community port of the qt6 based KDE plasma browser Angelfish for example and it is running just fine on Sailfish OS.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (6 children)

    Sailfish OS can run on mainline kernel. The Jolla Phone does not run a mainline kernel because it consists of off the shelf phone components and those are for Android phones outside of the world of iOS.

    Mainlining is anything but easy if you aim is a functioning daily driver and not a tinker project, especially in a team as small as Jolla's with so many more urgent tasks.

    PS: Angelfish runs just fine on my Jolla Phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    "more urgent tasks"

    Jolla could just mainline and open source and they'd get more developer power, the devs just prefer devices that are more open

    Also, I'm mainlining stuff myself, without being a phone company. Surely they'd have a much easier time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    The kernel depends on the hardware. Trying to get hardware with mainline kernel support is hard and expensive. Mainlining isn't the trivial task you make it out to be, otherwise postmarket would not struggle that much. Or tell me which device just works with postmarket OS?

    Sailfish OS can work with mainline Linux kernels, it has been ported to the Pine Phone for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    It is not trivial, it can be. The company designing the phone can choose components with mainline kernel support over others.

    If you choose an SoC with decent support and, for example, a vibration module or modem with decent mainline support, you just have to write a device tree.

    If you build a phone, you know what regulators exist, what voltages they have and where they connect.

    It's not the type of reverse engineering I have to do myself, the phone company knows their own device.

    And even if they task another company to do it, they can just write in their contract "provide us with the following" and they get what they need.

    It's a lot easier for a phone company than for people doing it in their spare time by reverse engineering things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, you can choose components and then you get something like the Pinephone. Do I really need to go on why there are substantial downsides connected to that?dann können Of course, if you sell 10 mio phones things get easier but that is ou of reach for any such project by a long shot.

    Or which mainline Linux phone with acceptable hardware am I unaware of?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Oh, there are many acceptable phones, as people use Linux phones and this community also exists. There are many Linux phone users out there that accept a phone and choose to use it.

    No need to use a Pinephone, we have more modern SoC that are well supported, such as SM6350, SDM845, SDM670, SC7280...

    EDIT: Also, what I forgot to mention is that you really don't need to sell 10 million phones to build usable and decent hardware. See for example Fairphone, they have sold less than a million.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Name me a concrete phone model that has no significant compromises in hardware functionality. Maybe I missed those when I had a look into it.

    The Postmarket wiki only shows a handful of devices where Call functionality is classified with "Yes", rather than "Partial" or even "No". Other than Pine Phone and Purism Librem that is only the Shift6mq from 2020 and four Xiaomi devices with the newest one being also from 2020, all of those have core functionality that does not fully work. Maybe that wiki is horrendously out of date but then this doesn't do good service to give newcomers a good idea where the project stands.

    BTW: I am not saying btw that postmarket isn't interesting nonetheless to many people and a great project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Mine came today and I didn't find the time to really dive into, but it seems nice so far

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Finally got to viewing this. Great review. Always loved sailfish ever since I had my N9 (with its predecessor Meego.)

    Best UI hands down. I would love to get this if it worked stateside.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    The road to perfection is step by step. And sometimes you have two terrible choices, and you have to choose the one which is less bad.

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/linuxphones@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Waiting for mine that should arrive by the end of August :)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Got an email, they told me it should arrive later this month, although i think is going to be early october.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    For everyone interested here is the official product page: https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-october-2026

    The 8GB/128GB version costs 649€

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Is the Jolla Phone 2 open source like the Pinephone? If not, I'm not buying it. Isn't the default OS that comes with the phone, Sailfish OS, partially proprietary?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I'll probably get the foldable Google Pixel in six years and will install GrapheneOS on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I doubt the folding mechanism will last that long and they might not be easily available by then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I have a Pixel 9 Pro Fold with GrapheneOS on it. Supposedly, the hinge has been tested to 200k folds with no issue, and it does indeed feel solid. I only use the inside screen a few times a day max though, so there's no way I'm going to verify anywhere close to 200k folds before something else fails or just gets too outdated. It might not hold up for someone who abuses their tech a lot, but I haven't broken a single phone screen in 20 years often just running with a case and no screen protection, and I expect I'm not the only one in that market.

    It's worth mentioning that I bought the phone new and unlocked but at a massive bargain ($720 USD). I definitely would not have grabbed it near full price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    massive bargain ($720 USD)

    Wow. Guess you have a wildly different definition of what a bargain is. I'd never even consider paying that much for a phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I meant relative to MSRP. This model was $1,799 at launch just a year or two ago. Keep in mind the Jolla Phone 2 is also about $700 USD.

    I need lots of screen real estate for work and projects, so I basically can't use phones less than 7" anymore, which knocks out a lot of reasonable budget options, and this was a good chance to try a foldable for not much more money than what I would be spending at minimum anyway.

    I'm also expecting Android-based OSs to maybe not be a viable option for my upgrade after this one, so I wanted performance I'd be happy with for a while while I wait for Linux phones to mature some more. I tend to stick with any one phone for 5 or more years, and I'm hoping to do the same here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    this is an incredibly, improbably shit video.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thanks for your feedback 🫶

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    the video blows, dude. jolla are opensource takers, they don't have a free tier so you can't just install it and take it for a spin. so an actual "here's how it works" video is beneficial.

    my contention is that sailfish should be the next thing, after wrangling it out of the hands of those fucks. not forked android, not tweaked gnome shell on postmarketos.

    this video wastes time on converting imaginary people over who don't know they're being spied on (the three hour long, or so it felt, intro with pichai and friends) showing ubuntu touch (wtf) and the presenter's face in the frame for what feels like 90% of the video.

    this is a shit video on its own and especially for the target audience here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 17 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I just want to buy this how can I in America

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 3 months ago* (10 children)

    Proprietary OS. Idc if it is "Linux". Android is Linux, and AOSP is open source. Why use a proprietary Linux distro over something like GrapheneOS which is fully free and open source software. I don't think any person who cares about their privacy should use SailfishOS. It really seems like privacy-washing and OSS-washing. I say kick proprietary Linux distros out of the community.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Oh shut up.

    This is why we can’t have nice things. Everytime something took a step in the right direction the past two decades in open source, someone started throwing toenails around, scaring off people.

    And while you throw ”proprietary” around with the toenails, you are the one here telling people to throw money at Google to buy a pixel. At least put your money where your mouth is and buy libre hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Agreed, annoying how much people are moving the goalpost for this thing. It's an actually usable alternative to android and ios, with hardware features literally voted by the community. It's not perfect, but it's actually viable, with features people actually wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Ubuntu, Android... even they have proprietary parts. That’s the business. SailfishOS does too, but only a small part (~20%) is proprietary, like some UI components and hardware drivers. It’s not fully closed, just a pragmatic mix to work on real devices. So yes, you gotta pay the Jolla team.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Depending on what you value and expect from a "more" private device than the main hardware brands and their software these are not particularly secure physically, and to some extent via software. It's somewhere between pixel flavor of Android and grapheneos. Steps in the right direction. I will be watching for future versions especially as they come to be viable in the US.

    Little reading on what I'm referring without a deep (and albeit opinionated) dive by the graphene team on the hardware, and similar but done by other teams for sailfish specifically.

    https://hivesecurity.gitlab.io/blog/jolla-phone-privacy-threat-model-2026/

    Edit: That is opinionated as in the architectural decisions and trade offs made to reach a certain level of protection not as in bias or "opinions". Aka software usage of opinionated in the way that a framework might be.

    Edit Two: Listed graphene as the high end of security for our current offerings in the consumer space that are still considered full featured smart phones. iOS is also a contender, but they aren't as concerned with privacy as grapheneos is. They are a business first. Privacy for them while it does exist is a means to an end. Marketing doing it's thing.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    The alternative is FairPhone and e/OS (OpenSource)

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/peertube@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Can't wait for a US version.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Gosh, preorders went almost 500% of funding goal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment