Does these work outside of Europe?
post
I find it impressive how negative people tend to be because something is not pure enough, they talk it down even much more than the duopoly systems. Yes, Sailfish OS has some closed source UI parts, and you can't just install desktop programs outside of the cli without running into problems. But running desktop programs, not optimised for mobile use are a terrible experience to begin with. This is a mobile device, not a desktop. If you disagree with that and want a desktop on your phone, there are options for you too, Sailfish OS isn't it though.
That said, what surprised me most is how much I am in the terminal on the phone and enjoying it. You'd certainly not going to have that kind of experience on an Android, also not on a degoogled one.
For everyone interested here is the official product page: https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-october-2026
the 8GB/128GB version costs 649€
It being proprietary is a nonstarter for me
Also, no mainline kernel support. Pretty sure it'd be easy to do for Jolla (even I manage to do some mainlining work and I don't sell phones).
This means it'll be a security nightmare at some point, just like any other phone.
Plus the specific app format. You cannot install the many nice GNOME apps, KDE apps and others that already exist.
I do have a SailfishOS phone for testing, but to make it even a bit useful I'd have to use AppSupport, which is Android in a container with a proprietary wrapper. There are barely any apps, they should leverage the power of the many mobile Linux apps that exist. I'd rather have some apps with a UI that looks different to the rest than not having what I need.
This is what really makes it a non-starter for me. Also, if there was a mainline kernel, I could just install any other distro I want instead.
I'm still waiting for a somewhat modern phone with a fully functional mainline kernel.
The app format lock in sounds crazy to me. How does it stop you from running other apps? Does it not have a terminal? Does it not give you sudo? Does it refuse to run any executables, or is it about the ui toolkit?
Sorry for the barrage, that sounded outrageous
They just have their own format using their owm SailfishOS-specific UI libraries. Their apps don't work elsewhere without patching, there's no Flatpak and they only have SailfishOS apps in the repo.
Sure, you can write your own apps, but I prefer using what's already there.
There is no lock in, there are merely incompatibilities. You can install sudo, but by default there is devel-su which is pretty much the same thing. You can install rpms and if you don't like pkcon you can install zypper as package manager. As long as you stay within the terminal emulator things tend to work.
There is a misunderstanding that desktop programs would be such a great boon for a mobile phone. But mobile phones suck with desktop UI. You need a mobile UI for it to make sense and that is exactly where incompatibilities are coming from.
I installed a community port of the qt6 based KDE plasma browser Angelfish for example and it is running just fine on Sailfish OS.
Sailfish OS can run on mainline kernel. The Jolla Phone does not run a mainline kernel because it consists of off the shelf phone components and those are for Android phones outside of the world of iOS.
Mainlining is anything but easy if you aim is a functioning daily driver and not a tinker project, especially in a team as small as Jolla's with so many more urgent tasks.
PS: Angelfish runs just fine on my Jolla Phone.
"more urgent tasks"
Jolla could just mainline and open source and they'd get more developer power, the devs just prefer devices that are more open
Also, I'm mainlining stuff myself, without being a phone company. Surely they'd have a much easier time.
The kernel depends on the hardware. Trying to get hardware with mainline kernel support is hard and expensive. Mainlining isn't the trivial task you make it out to be, otherwise postmarket would not struggle that much. Or tell me which device just works with postmarket OS?
Sailfish OS can work with mainline Linux kernels, it has been ported to the Pine Phone for example.
It is not trivial, it can be. The company designing the phone can choose components with mainline kernel support over others.
If you choose an SoC with decent support and, for example, a vibration module or modem with decent mainline support, you just have to write a device tree.
If you build a phone, you know what regulators exist, what voltages they have and where they connect.
It's not the type of reverse engineering I have to do myself, the phone company knows their own device.
And even if they task another company to do it, they can just write in their contract "provide us with the following" and they get what they need.
It's a lot easier for a phone company than for people doing it in their spare time by reverse engineering things.
Yes, you can choose components and then you get something like the Pinephone. Do I really need to go on why there are substantial downsides connected to that?dann können Of course, if you sell 10 mio phones things get easier but that is ou of reach for any such project by a long shot.
Or which mainline Linux phone with acceptable hardware am I unaware of?
Oh, there are many acceptable phones, as people use Linux phones and this community also exists. There are many Linux phone users out there that accept a phone and choose to use it.
No need to use a Pinephone, we have more modern SoC that are well supported, such as SM6350, SDM845, SDM670, SC7280...
EDIT: Also, what I forgot to mention is that you really don't need to sell 10 million phones to build usable and decent hardware. See for example Fairphone, they have sold less than a million.
Name me a concrete phone model that has no significant compromises in hardware functionality. Maybe I missed those when I had a look into it.
The Postmarket wiki only shows a handful of devices where Call functionality is classified with "Yes", rather than "Partial" or even "No". Other than Pine Phone and Purism Librem that is only the Shift6mq from 2020 and four Xiaomi devices with the newest one being also from 2020, all of those have core functionality that does not fully work. Maybe that wiki is horrendously out of date but then this doesn't do good service to give newcomers a good idea where the project stands.
BTW: I am not saying btw that postmarket isn't interesting nonetheless to many people and a great project.
What's a good non-proprietary option?
Mine came today and I didn't find the time to really dive into, but it seems nice so far
Finally got to viewing this. Great review. Always loved sailfish ever since I had my N9 (with its predecessor Meego.)
Best UI hands down. I would love to get this if it worked stateside.
The road to perfection is step by step. And sometimes you have two terrible choices, and you have to choose the one which is less bad.
Waiting for mine that should arrive by the end of August :)
Did you get it? :D
Got an email, they told me it should arrive later this month, although i think is going to be early october.
For everyone interested here is the official product page: https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-october-2026
The 8GB/128GB version costs 649€
Is the Jolla Phone 2 open source like the Pinephone? If not, I'm not buying it. Isn't the default OS that comes with the phone, Sailfish OS, partially proprietary?
I'll probably get the foldable Google Pixel in six years and will install GrapheneOS on it.
I doubt the folding mechanism will last that long and they might not be easily available by then.
I have a Pixel 9 Pro Fold with GrapheneOS on it. Supposedly, the hinge has been tested to 200k folds with no issue, and it does indeed feel solid. I only use the inside screen a few times a day max though, so there's no way I'm going to verify anywhere close to 200k folds before something else fails or just gets too outdated. It might not hold up for someone who abuses their tech a lot, but I haven't broken a single phone screen in 20 years often just running with a case and no screen protection, and I expect I'm not the only one in that market.
It's worth mentioning that I bought the phone new and unlocked but at a massive bargain ($720 USD). I definitely would not have grabbed it near full price.
massive bargain ($720 USD)
Wow. Guess you have a wildly different definition of what a bargain is. I'd never even consider paying that much for a phone.
I meant relative to MSRP. This model was $1,799 at launch just a year or two ago. Keep in mind the Jolla Phone 2 is also about $700 USD.
I need lots of screen real estate for work and projects, so I basically can't use phones less than 7" anymore, which knocks out a lot of reasonable budget options, and this was a good chance to try a foldable for not much more money than what I would be spending at minimum anyway.
I'm also expecting Android-based OSs to maybe not be a viable option for my upgrade after this one, so I wanted performance I'd be happy with for a while while I wait for Linux phones to mature some more. I tend to stick with any one phone for 5 or more years, and I'm hoping to do the same here.
I’ll probably get the foldable Google Pixel in six years and will install GrapheneOS on it.
And I hope this will meet all your needs 🤗
this is an incredibly, improbably shit video.
Thanks for your feedback 🫶
the video blows, dude. jolla are opensource takers, they don't have a free tier so you can't just install it and take it for a spin. so an actual "here's how it works" video is beneficial.
my contention is that sailfish should be the next thing, after wrangling it out of the hands of those fucks. not forked android, not tweaked gnome shell on postmarketos.
this video wastes time on converting imaginary people over who don't know they're being spied on (the three hour long, or so it felt, intro with pichai and friends) showing ubuntu touch (wtf) and the presenter's face in the frame for what feels like 90% of the video.
this is a shit video on its own and especially for the target audience here.
I just want to buy this how can I in America
I'd be very careful about ordering something designed for another continent's cell network.
Absolutely! There is also a forum thread that discusses this topic: https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/would-the-new-2026-jolla-phone-work-in-the-us/30366
Obviously you can use a parcel forwarding package https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/potential-us-customers-for-new-jolla-phone/30640/1
Proprietary OS. Idc if it is "Linux". Android is Linux, and AOSP is open source. Why use a proprietary Linux distro over something like GrapheneOS which is fully free and open source software. I don't think any person who cares about their privacy should use SailfishOS. It really seems like privacy-washing and OSS-washing. I say kick proprietary Linux distros out of the community.
Oh shut up.
This is why we can’t have nice things. Everytime something took a step in the right direction the past two decades in open source, someone started throwing toenails around, scaring off people.
And while you throw ”proprietary” around with the toenails, you are the one here telling people to throw money at Google to buy a pixel. At least put your money where your mouth is and buy libre hardware.
Agreed, annoying how much people are moving the goalpost for this thing. It's an actually usable alternative to android and ios, with hardware features literally voted by the community. It's not perfect, but it's actually viable, with features people actually wanted.
Buying a used pixel on eBay doesn’t give Google any money. I agree with the rest of you point but I think it’s facetious to act like you have no option but to pay Google directly to get a pixel.
Ubuntu, Android... even they have proprietary parts. That’s the business. SailfishOS does too, but only a small part (~20%) is proprietary, like some UI components and hardware drivers. It’s not fully closed, just a pragmatic mix to work on real devices. So yes, you gotta pay the Jolla team.
No, you misunderstood me I think. I’m happy to throw money at Jolla, and I have done so.
I’m not impressed about people complaining that Sailfish is ”proprietary” while handing money over to Google.
Depending on what you value and expect from a "more" private device than the main hardware brands and their software these are not particularly secure physically, and to some extent via software. It's somewhere between pixel flavor of Android and grapheneos. Steps in the right direction. I will be watching for future versions especially as they come to be viable in the US.
Little reading on what I'm referring without a deep (and albeit opinionated) dive by the graphene team on the hardware, and similar but done by other teams for sailfish specifically.
https://hivesecurity.gitlab.io/blog/jolla-phone-privacy-threat-model-2026/
Edit: That is opinionated as in the architectural decisions and trade offs made to reach a certain level of protection not as in bias or "opinions". Aka software usage of opinionated in the way that a framework might be.
Edit Two: Listed graphene as the high end of security for our current offerings in the consumer space that are still considered full featured smart phones. iOS is also a contender, but they aren't as concerned with privacy as grapheneos is. They are a business first. Privacy for them while it does exist is a means to an end. Marketing doing it's thing.
Gosh, preorders went almost 500% of funding goal.
1 comment