As munitions streaked through the night sky, a plaintive cry like a whale song echoed in the darkness. U.S. troops grabbed their gear and headed for shelter as the warning sirens rang out, a leaked video shows.

The military personnel, clad in a mix of combat fatigues and gym attire, piled into a bunker, huddling in the darkness. “Guys, off the walls if we can,” a woman, likely a medic, advised, warning about the danger of traumatic brain injuries.

The footage, reportedly from Jordan’s Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, where three U.S. troops were killed during Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks on July 17 and 18, offers a glimpse of the dangers faced by U.S. forces across the Middle East.

The attacks are continued demonstrations of Iran’s ability to target U.S. bases across the Middle East and kill U.S. troops, despite months of claims by President Donald Trump and self-styled War Secretary Pete Hegseth that Iran’s military was annihilated. As this fiction has collapsed, U.S. Central Command has refused to discuss the number and scale of the strikes. “I have nothing for you on that,” Maj. Emma Thompson, the command’s media operations chief, told The Intercept.

Iran has attacked at least nine U.S. outposts across the Middle East since July 9, according to a U.S. official who spoke to The Intercept on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak with the press. Several of these bases suffered “significant” damage in the attacks, the source said.

[

Related

Hegseth Asks for More Money as Iran War Costs Skyrocket](https://theintercept.com/2026/05/12/hegseth-pentagn-budget-defense-iran-war-cost/)

Iran’s military managed to overwhelm U.S. air defense systems using a mix of attack drones and advanced ballistic missiles, according to the official. Numerous factors make the missiles difficult to defeat, the source said: They travel at hypersonic speeds, have complex navigational capabilities including methods to circumvent jamming, and some can be guided or steered.

Stocks of advanced air-defense missiles, like Patriot and THAAD interceptors, are so depleted that U.S. forces are not shooting down all Iranian missiles and drones aimed at U.S. and allied targets across the Middle East, the official said, referencing a Friday report by NBC News that revealed the tactic. The official told The Intercept that the U.S. allows missiles through its defenses only in cases where a strike is judged not to imperil U.S. lives.

The U.S. and its allies burned through more than 11,000 munitions, including large amounts of defensive missiles, in the first 16 days of the war alone, according to a March analysis by the Royal United Services Institute. The report predicted then that U.S. forces were about a month away from running out of THAAD interceptors. An April report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies noted that “diminished munitions stockpiles have created a near-term risk.” A follow-up report the next month warned that it would “take three or more years from today to return to prewar inventory levels” of Patriot and THAAD missiles.

Brig. Gen. Hossein Mohebbi, an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps spokesperson, said that “Patriot systems have been weakened to such an extent that Iranian missiles and drones are reaching their targets without being intercepted.” He said that during a flurry of attacks from July 8 to July 22, Iran struck numerous air defense and radar installations, including six “Patriot air-defense radars.”

CENTCOM did not reply to a request for comment on the claims by the U.S. official or Mohebbi.

The official confirmed that Iran also recently attacked Tower 22, a U.S. military outpost on the northern Jordanian border with Syria. Satellite images as well as photos and videos circulating online indicate the base suffered extensive damage. (In 2024, a drone attack on Tower 22 by an Iran-backed militia killed three U.S. troops.)

Iran says it also attacked U.S. military facilities at Jordan’s Prince Hassan Air Base, King Faisal Air Base, and Al-Azraq Air Base; Kuwait’s Al-Adiri base, Ahmed Al-Jaber Air Base, Camp Doha, Ali Al Salem Air Base, and Camp Arifjan; Naval Support Activity Sheikh Isa in Bahrain; and Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

Thompson refused to confirm Iranian attacks on various U.S. bases across the Middle East. “We don’t comment on battle damage assessments,” she said.

[HANDOUT - 03 January 2020, Iraq, Bagdad: The remains of a vehicle hit by missiles outside Baghdad airport. (Best possible image quality) According to its own statements, the USA carried out the missile attack in Iraq in which one of the highest Iranian generals was killed. Photo by: picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images

Read Our Complete Coverage

Targeting Iran --------------](/collections/targeting-iran/)

Iran has fired between 8,000 and 9,000 drones and missiles at targets across the Middle East since the U.S.–Israeli war began in February, according to the official. Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps recently warned residents of countries that host American forces to keep at least 1,650 feet away from any buildings housing U.S. personnel. The group is also fielding crowdsourced information on “new locations of the American occupying forces” from people in these countries.

The IRGC specifically mentioned “covert and secret” facilities in a statement posted on their website. CIA sites in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere in the region were reportedly struck, possibly with Russian assistance, according to Reuters. A former Pentagon consultant with ties to the defense industry told The Intercept that Russia has certainly provided “targeting support” to Iran during the conflict but did not comment directly on attacks on CIA facilities.

Despite Trump’s insistence that Russia and China are “not participating” in the Iran war, Hegseth recently said both are “enabling some of the things Iran is doing.” In March, CIA Director John Ratcliffe told senators that the “Iranians are requesting intelligence assistance from Russia, from China and from other adversaries of the United States,” but said he would only talk about what they might have provided in a classified setting.

The lethal strike on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan killed Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas; Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii; and Sgt. Angel S. Rampersad, 28, of Ozone Park, New York. All three soldiers were from air defense units. They were “not actively engaged in anti-aircraft activity” during the attacks, according to a different “defense official” who spoke on background because they were not authorized to disclose the information.

An Iranian drone attack on Erbil Air Base, Iraq, on July 18 led to the death of Army Sgt. Michael Emmanuel Swinton, 30, of Fayetteville, North Carolina, and left another soldier injured during what CENTCOM called a “controlled detonation” of the downed aircraft.

In April, Hegseth told the Senate Armed Services Committee that “CENTCOM had every possible measure they could to ensure that our troops are protected.” The U.S. official would not address possible failures of force protection measures that led to the most recent deaths, due to operational security. But the official said that Hegseth’s claims “obviously were not true.” They noted that it was no secret that earlier casualties were caused by a lack of sufficient overhead protection, referencing a March 1 drone attack on the U.S. base at Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, that killed six troops.

[

Related

“Cover-Up” Unravels as Pentagon Admits Nearly 100 Injured in Iran Strikes](https://theintercept.com/2026/07/21/iran-war-pentagon-casualties-injuries/)

Hundreds of U.S. personnel have been killed or wounded in the war. Months of reporting by The Intercept found the Pentagon’s official casualty tally is a gross undercount, which another U.S. government official called a “casualty cover-up.”

Israel, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, and Qatar said they intercepted attack drones on Monday, two days after the United States abruptly suspended a two-week campaign of airstrikes against Iran amid concern over the dwindling stocks of air defense missiles and a reported dearth of Iranian targets. Trump insisted on Tuesday that there had been some “very good talks” with Iran but failed to offer evidence when confronted with Iranian denials.

Saudi Arabia said on Monday that the drone attacks it suffered were “carried out by Iran-backed militias operating in Iraq.” On Tuesday, Jordanian authorities said they downed a drone in the east of the country, near its border with Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

The post Iran Has Figured Out How to Overwhelm U.S. Air Defenses appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 3 months ago

The road has never been more paved for China to do what it wants

  • source
  • 28 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 61 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    "Figured out"...

    It's a numbers game.

    For every 25k drone they launch, we spend millions to take it down.

    All Iran has to do is keep launching till we can't shoot em down anymore. Their factories are literally right there. And it's not like they stop producing them during any ceasefires. Every ceasefire helps Iran 10x as much as it helps us.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 28 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    True, but also this:

    Iran’s military managed to overwhelm U.S. air defense systems using a mix of attack drones and advanced ballistic missiles, according to the official. Numerous factors make the missiles difficult to defeat, the source said: They travel at hypersonic speeds, have complex navigational capabilities including methods to circumvent jamming, and some can be guided or steered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    We can shoot those down...

    The issue is we've been shooting the cheaper than a Honda Civic drones down with what it takes to shoot the ballistic missiles down.

    So they send a swarm of drones, we start over-reacting with interceptors, and then they slip some ballistic missiles in.

    Even if we notice instantly, the timing may be just off enough that they get thru.

    Again, not complicated, and not something they just figured out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    "have complex navigational capabilities including methods to circumvent jamming, and some can be guided or steered."

    At what point does a drone become a missile and a missile become a drone? Is it a specific set of requierments or just what ever Jimmy the journalist wants to say on the day?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    It's never been a real word. Anything including the original ww2 missiles could be called a drone. Missiles are rockets with a warhead, but then you have cruise missiles that are basically completely different in every way. It's just a category.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'd say it's a drone if it can hover.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I don't know about hover, there are drones that are basically small planes. My definition would probably include landing and being reused.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    Most of those drones definitely cannot land. Even some of the reusable drones are bad at landing and are basically caught in a net instead.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugiFhRJzo5Y

    The difference is that missiles used jet propulsion and don't use wings to generate lift. Drones typically used propellers and wings to fly. Now we also have drones with jet propulsion so the main difference is that drones use wings, missiles do not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago

    You see, Americans have a preset limit of intercepting missiles. Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own drones and missiles at them, until they ran out of missiles.

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    People forget. The Iranian people have been at war their whole lives. Some have even been trained by America. They know our tactics. They know our capabilities. They are fighting on home territory. What's crazy is that Trump fired the generals that warned him.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    trump's old man was a mob boss, the orange shithead fancies himself as a mob boss, mob bosses demand loyalty above all. competence means nothing to them. when you are planning on committing crimes, you need loyal criminals around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Not like it's hard to out maneuver people with room temperature IQ. They fired anyone that knew what they were doing. Frankly, it's like shooting fish in a bucket.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    The problem the US has is that they're not adapting fast enough to the drone warfare present, because defense contracts are decided by a committee that's just trying to line its own pockets.

    They have a basically infinite budget though and they may be behind now, but they sure as shit know how bounce to the top quickly when it comes to inventing new ways to make others suffer.

    The US armed forces will eventually get deployable drone swarms too big and advanced to either defend against or penetrate through with other drones, and the cat-mouse game continues.

    God forbid they stop making aircraft carriers that can launch 30 hornets and start making ones that launch 100.000 rc fireworks from hell

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Nah the problem the US has is it's insistence on jumping into conflicts it should stay out of, even if Palantir or Andril or whatever LOTR artifact the next physco names his tech defense contractor after replaces big-MIC with tech-bro-MIC were still fucked because we simply shouldn't be there!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Personally im pushing for reduction in military spending and telling my congressmen I don't want any money approved for warfare or armed federales. Granted they have not been listening but maybe if enough of us push they might have to deal with a non infinite sum.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Hasn't drone warfare been in use in other conflicts for several years now (I'm thinking of Ukraine but maybe there are other examples)? Why hasn't the military developed a solution to this yet? Where did the multiple trillions of our taxpayer dollars go if that spending wasn't used to prepare for modern warfare?

    I agree with you on all points. We shouldn't be there. Cut the military budget in half. We don't truly need that large of a military presence. We have nukes as a defensive deterrent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • My uninformed take is that cheap drones have been used by the underdog countries to counter larger technologically developed militaries. The us congress will never fund a solution to cheap drones because they are stubborn and highly lobbied old men with war machine superiority complexes and their world view won’t accept swarming low tech is better than their newest 100 million dollar aircraft or billion dollar warships.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    There are multiple systems for handling drone swarms in the pipeline right now. Some of them are nearly through testing and will start production and deployment later this year. Leonidas and de-shorad are two examples.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Where did the multiple trillions of our taxpayer dollars go if that spending wasn't used to prepare for modern warfare?

    You should watch "The Pentagon Wars", a good movie about wasting money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Let the idiot deplete his resources for no good reason, then retaliate.

    It may be rocket science, but only to the extent that it helps to count them.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago
    14 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    Defeating enemy air defense is not a state secret.

    It just requires a technologically capable military with good ISR and healthly munition stockpiles.

    Destroy radars, launch saturation attacks, and persistence.

    Some specific weapons may have better, or worse, hit rates due to their technological capabilities, or limitations, but that's not what the strategy ultimately relies on.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    What actually matters here is that the whole US military doctrine has become obsolete because of drones. It's not just that Iran can find and hit US targets, it's that they can do it very cheaply while US has to spend expensive and difficult to build interceptors which can't even hit these kinds of targets effectively. It's the economics of the whole thing that are defeating the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I understand the changing dynamics of war unleashed in Ukraine, I'm commenting on the subject of the article you posted.

    The headline makes it sound like it was some mystery that had yet to be solved, or a problem that hadn't already been figured out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I think if you read the actual article you'll see that the headline is justified. It explains the actual mechanics of what Iran did, and this shouldn't be trivialized. While the idea of what to do might not be that complicated, actually implementing it against an adversary like the US is not trivial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    I read the article and wasn't trivializing their accomplishment.

    But that has nothing to do with the editorial choices of The Intercept and the misleading nature of that headline, which is what my comment was directed at.

    It's the exact same strategy that has been used by both Ukraine and Russia for years now.

    The only difference is that instead of America providing Ukraine their ISR, conducting BDAs, etc., it's China and/or Russia providing those intelligence services to the Iranians.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    I don't really see the misleading part in the headline myself. While China and Russia undoubtedly help Iran, it seems that Iranians are perfectly capable to inflict massive damage on the empire using their own technical capabilities. While Ukraine is a western proxy entirely dependent on its western masters, Iran has its own deep technological and industrial base. It's worth remembering that it was Iran that originally did a technology transfer of their drone technology to Russia rather than the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    You keep misunderstanding me.

    Iran is deploying the exact same anti-air defense strategies that were developed on the battlefield of Ukraine.

    That is smart, they we're not trying to not reinvent the wheel.

    But it also means that the headline is misleading as it was not them who developed the strategy, or "figured" it out.

    It's just a bad headline, which I was calling attention to, but it's not something I would normally devote multiple comments to, so this is my last one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Can you put the text, please? I can't find on Internet Archive.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments