top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 151 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The only way to get ahead in today's world is to abandon all of your principles. What a shitty set-up.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I still remember this line someone said while complaining about how The Boys was toothless at actually pushing back against hero worship and capitalism.

    You don't have to care, but vou really can't even if you want to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    i find it ironic how a lot of anti-capitalist shows are owned by Amazon and Apple

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    There's a debate to be had about not participating in platforms that do bad things vs. reaching people where they are, I suppose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago*

    reaching people where they are.

    Aaaand that’s how we got Twitter.

    There is no “reaching people.” Twitter is algorithmic. It only shows posts to people who’d find it engaging; in others words, you’re either posting into a black hole, preaching to the choir, or intentionally rage baiting.

    The is no point in advocacy there. It gives the illusion of it, but it’s a lie.


    Now, if they want to prepend every post with a link to Bluesky/Fediverse?

    That’s great.

    A siphon off the site is great. They’d probably get deprioritized for it, kinda like how posting Lemmy links seems to get one shadowbanned on Reddit. But participating in Twitter is otherwise just feeding the trolls.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Companies don't have morals, all they have is just profit. Why are you holding Firefox to some mythical standard? It's a company, it's only gotten shadier. Can't wait when other browsers hit the market in a couple years and Firefox will eventually die. Just a matter of time, they can't increase their market share for fuck all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 425 points 3 months ago (39 children)

    Please, Mozilla, explain in detail exactly in which way the internet is changing again, that requires you to return to Faschitter? Please help me make sense of this.

  • source
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 166 points 3 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    You didn't state how much you are betting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 72 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Cutting off Twitter means losing potential audience. It was an ideological stance when they did it, now nothing ideological is left at MozCorp.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Really what real people.are left on twitter?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    The fuck you doing Kurt Vinnegut, speaking from fake lemmy profiles. I know it as you, Kurt. Admit your Kilgore trout@ i know your the same person! It just is as it he. Poo te weet! As I say it now. Fuck is time weird. A quake coming. And that's God's slapstick; our dumbasses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    :')

    I wish I could have met him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    I remember being in my freshman year of college in what would be the most disastrous nest departures in human history and watching the Fox News report on Kurt Vonnegut, how scathing it was, and that led to me reading his books, because my identity at the time was anti-right, and because this I learned this really important shit at a critical point in my life because I identified with his words and characters and humor. Now I shitpost on the internet because I told my ROTC cadre that my nonexistent sister got me pregnant because I judged the wrath of my father more of a threat that the United States military. Counterintelligence is cool, bro. That's why I pee my pants, Billy Madison style, so these kids don't feel afraid to post their retarded ass shit, cuz at least they're not as stupid as my dumb ass, which is objectively the truth because God's a funny dick. Kids, amirite? At least I found Jesus by craning my neck, trying to find him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    To me it seems like they're really pushing for mass-market appeal right now compared to just maintaining or slowly growing their existing more dedicated/niche base.

    You can see it with them adding widgets, a free VPN, more visibly advertising trackers blocked (at least on Android, not sure about iOS), rebranding with a new mascot, and now going back to a platform that still has a ton of user lock-in keeping people there. They're trying to pull in regular people, I presume so they don't become as dependent on a base that has more strongly held convictions that Mozilla has to comply with to keep its users.

    If it works out for them, it'll be good for their long-term funding and security, market appeal, etc, but bad for users that care a lot more about fundamental principles.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    There's potential users there, and ff isn't going to lose any users by rejoining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I just can't imagine anyone is going to change to chrome because ff started posting to x.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Not really. The soft forks are more like pre-packaged configurations than separate browsers. If ff dies all the forks die.

    I've used LibreWolf for years now but I still consider myself to be using firefox.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Just lost one now. How many did it gain?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Sadly plenty of ppl still use Twitter, plenty of companies and celebs still doing their thing there. Why do we have to single out Firefox? It's not a company that as ideals like most people here do. Yeah their new stuff is definitely shady, but it's that for Chromium. I'll still use Firefox, this doesn't bother me at all, cuz honestly who gives a fuck. I get the optics, but we do not live in a perfect world of morals and ideals. I only have limited energy I can dish out and this affects me 0% so I'll put that much into it. People are addicted to being angry all the time...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    My comment isn't really about them returning to X. It's about them blaming it on some type of sudden change in the internet that's supposedly happening "again", that's forcing them to return. Just be honest and say it's for the reason you mentioned, that they want to reach as many as possible. 👍

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 81 points 3 months ago

    This really requires the angry goose meme with the goose yelling: "Why did you take time off x?"

  • source
  • [–] 72 points 3 months ago
    [–] 119 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Fucking cowards. So many spineless losers who clutched their pearls after The Salute and pledged to leave. Too many other cowards stayed, so now they go back because “we can’t lose touch with all the cowards”.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 3 months ago*

    It's just that classic corporate moral grandstanding in another flavor, like companies who are pro-Pride for June but forget queer people exist 11 months of the year, or worse, only have Pride acknowledgement during Democrat presidencies.

    Virtually every (large) (for-profit) company's moral compass is: Get more money.

    If fully endorsing Hitler would result in a 1% rise in profits, they'd do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 107 points 3 months ago
    [–] 51 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Ridiculous.

    Don't forget how quickly they shut down their Mastodon instance even though it cost them nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    It cost them nothing? Isn't there some kind of hardware or software/IT/power cost for hosting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I'm pretty sure self-hosting a single mastodon server where you're basically the only person on it likely costs less than 50$ per month...

    That's a peanut for a million dollar company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    If you’re a company hosting anything you’re a target for hackers. You can’t just set up a server and call it a day. You have to take extra precautions that Joe Schmoe doesn’t have to worry about. And it’s a continuous effort, not one and done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    They even paid for the "verification" 🤮

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    title? that looks like potentially entertaining

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Dr. Strangelove. Very well made movie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    oh damn - that's been on my bucket list for decades. thank you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 66 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Yup, as someone who tried to use Twitter back in the day it's much harder to use it than to ignore it. Twitter is just shouting your virtue signaling and dog whistles into the void for worthless Kudos. I can do that without even using a computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 91 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Mozilla doesn't really like it's users. It wants it's users to be Chrome users. I've said for too many years that they need to stop copying Google and forge their own path, that's how you change the browser market, not copying everyone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I've said for too many years that they need to stop copying Google and forge their own path

    They clearly don't want to. Everyone at Mozzila is happy to be Google's anti monopoly excuse and live in utter mediocrity. It's by design.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 3 months ago

    Mozilla is truly going for tech bro territory with an unhealthy dose of AI mixed with fascism.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago

    I never understood why non-profits hire "leadership" from for-profit companies. You're just going to get a non-profit that acts like a for-profit.

  • source
  • [+] 25 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    The internet is changing how btw? Are they referring to the sloppening?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    Pretty sure they are referring to the ens—tification process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Why even bother using the word if you're going to self censor?

    They even gave you a perfectly good alternative and you corrected it with a self censored word. Do you like how tight your leash feels?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I dunno. But at least I feel acknowledged by the time and effort you put into a response. I’m delighted you took that time for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Seriously, examine the why's of the things you do. If you don't like cursing, don't curse. Use different words. Censoring on the behalf of corporate interests immediately makes you the enemy of anyone with half a brain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I”ll choose my own words. If anyone read it, sounding it out in the reader’s inner voice would provide the intended understanding of what was being communicated. We ain’t writing code here. Ens—tification, enshitification. I understand it either way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I”ll choose my own words.

    But you don't, clearly, because you'd rather opt for a word chosen for you by your corporate owners. In fact, you tried to correct someone choosing to use a different word than enshitification with your self censored version.

    Some people hate being put in a cage, others cheer - you seem like the latter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago

    You’re really falling for this. I’m happy to be occupying so much of your mind that you feel compelled to respond to every retort. I’m pretty sure you could hide your own Easter eggs. Good luck with everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 106 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 46 points 3 months ago

    Fuck off Mozilla

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›