▲ 842 ▼ Firefox capitulates and returns to Twitter (lemmy.world) submitted 3 months ago by antonim@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.world 339 comments fedilink hide all child comments ☹️ 13 🥲 2
[–] freudian_slop@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago (7 children) Maybe 5 angry Lemmy user. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] fizzle 11 points 3 months ago (6 children) I just can't imagine anyone is going to change to chrome because ff started posting to x. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children) Because those are the only two browsers in existence... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fizzle 8 points 3 months ago ... aside from the soft forks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AmyAye@nord.pub 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) There are alternative forks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fizzle 3 points 3 months ago Not really. The soft forks are more like pre-packaged configurations than separate browsers. If ff dies all the forks die. I've used LibreWolf for years now but I still consider myself to be using firefox. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago Brave? Just kidding 😓 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fizzle 11 points 3 months ago (6 children) I just can't imagine anyone is going to change to chrome because ff started posting to x. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children) Because those are the only two browsers in existence... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fizzle 8 points 3 months ago ... aside from the soft forks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AmyAye@nord.pub 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) There are alternative forks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fizzle 3 points 3 months ago Not really. The soft forks are more like pre-packaged configurations than separate browsers. If ff dies all the forks die. I've used LibreWolf for years now but I still consider myself to be using firefox. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago Brave? Just kidding 😓 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children) Because those are the only two browsers in existence... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fizzle 8 points 3 months ago ... aside from the soft forks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 1 point 3 months ago (2 children) There are alternative forks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fizzle 3 points 3 months ago Not really. The soft forks are more like pre-packaged configurations than separate browsers. If ff dies all the forks die. I've used LibreWolf for years now but I still consider myself to be using firefox. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago Brave? Just kidding 😓 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fizzle 3 points 3 months ago Not really. The soft forks are more like pre-packaged configurations than separate browsers. If ff dies all the forks die. I've used LibreWolf for years now but I still consider myself to be using firefox. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago Brave? Just kidding 😓 permalink fedilink source parent
