all 56 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 101 points 3 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 67 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Graduate degrees just prove someone is very knowledgeable about one specific field of study. Nobody said they couldn't be idiots over anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Unfortunately you're right. Maybe I'm deluding myself but I like to believe that higher education strives to be at least somewhat well rounded. I don't know what the programs are like everywhere but in my undergrad as a science major I also had to take courses from various disciplines(English composition, anthropology, philosophy, art, history, etc).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It also says "Hindu" so English might be their second language

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Ok fine, you are probably right, and this explains it. But it was funnier before your logic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    naaah bro. A lot of people in India knows the meaning of communism, socialism and capitalism. Dating apps are cesspool of humanity, and terms of India, even worse.

    Hindu is a religion, not a language. You can be educated while being a hindu.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 81 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Socialism is when you are social. The more social you are, the more socialism it is. If you are very social, you live in a commune

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    To live in a commune you have to be communicable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 3 months ago
    [–] 30 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I wish I was that naive. Imagine how much less rage-inducing life would be. You could just vibe and get along.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Am I being defensive or is that first question combative?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I read it as being maybe mildly combative but in a flirty way. But also conveying emotion over text is difficult, so I'd assume good intentions until unless given reason not to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 3 months ago (18 children)

    "extrovert with close friends" is just introvert

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (17 children)

    Extroverts can't have close friends?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    I had to Google this. Hmmmm well I'm planning a wedding rn and my invites are probably around 200 people. So I guess that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (14 children)

    Can all 200 of these change your undergarments, clean you up, and carry you around?

    ’cause for me that's close relationships. Closer are intimate partners.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (10 children)

    Yeah, what's your close friendship number?

    Extroverts have a much wider pool they can easily get close to.

    We are past talking about people you know.
    How many of them can change adult diapers for you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Ok but you realize you used the term "Dunbar number" incorrectly?

    But to answer your other question? Idk maybe 2-4 people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    2-4 people Hi fellow introvert.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    I feel like you struggle with precise definitions of words

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    It's quite the opposite. The fact you didn't know how Gen Z uses the term «dunbar» today, makes your vocabulary far less limited than mines. Now that I got your exact array of closeness, you're an introvert with high tolerance to social interaction. Your social battery is far more tolerant to stimulae.

    Extroverts are the exact opposite, they feel alive yapping, mingling, touching, passing tea, doing things in groups. They recharge socializing. Stimulae recharges them. Heck, they love socializing so much, they forget to eat at times, and wonder why they feel so wobbly and shaky.

    In terms of closeness, introverts deepen relationships, while extroverts widen their pools of trust. An extrovert can utterly be cradled by the masses, and introvert faints under public pressure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I feel like I'm getting a lecture from Dunning Kruger incarnate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thank you for allowing me to express my vocab, fellow grammarian. The fact you felt “lectured” also demonstrates your limited tolerance to accept new words and lingo extroverts easily add for their new found dictionary.
    DYK most extroverts don't know how to “Google” or look words in dictionaries? They usually have 6-10 people they call up and “hey ala, what's the word for that scene where penguin dous that thing to seal and like ‘wuammo!’?”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's pretty amazing how many incorrect assumptions you are making. Most people would just let the other person tell about themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    About proven science or my extraordinary way to categorize intro v. extro on threadiverse?

    This aint /c/tellmeaboutyourself, so if you want to yap urself, yar in te wrong comm.

    I only came to you to assess wat u actually kne about extros.

    I’m a switch btw.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not a full on socialist, more of a socialite.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You can not select "socialist" on bumble.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    To be fair, when i first heard about socialism thats where my mind wandered too

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Similarly, I was clearing out old, embarrassing emails from 20+ years ago and came across a conversation I had with a young woman I was trying to impress. She mentioned Scientology and how much it “just made sense” to her. I agreed, that was the only religion I could see myself following.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Why you gotta be so anti-socialist?!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Botulism is when you are botular.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I wouldn’t say I’m socialist. My brother isn’t very social, and I’m socialer than him, though not as social as my little sister. She’s really the socialist.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    You know, like a conversationalist! I converse, I'm social, what else would you call it? 😛

  • source