Erik King staring at a dude. Top text: "Me", bottom text: "The new car I just bought (in the EU)"

top 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 4 months ago

I hate this

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Rip out your modem. Cars should NEVER have a modem. Ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    The camera processes everything internally. There some build in machine learning model. It should not communicate or send anything images outside.

    Of course the problem is that it's all closed source so you can't verify that. Cars also call 112 now automatically in case of an accident so I suspect that ripping out your modem may cause some warning lights on your dashboard which can mean you will not pass your mandatory technical revision.

    So if you rip out your modem the camera will still work but you may have other issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Keep it for testing. I don't want my car to be able to call anyone. Ever. For any reason. Notice the @infosec.pub . Trust me it's wildly irresponsible engineering

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (2 children)

    if i make an incident, someone will either call the 112 for me or i will do it, unless i am in the fucking land of no one, so the car callin the emergency number is straight up useless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago
    [–] 20 points 4 months ago (14 children)

    Would it be illegal to cover the camera with electrical tape?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (13 children)

    It stops the car.

    I'm thinking of a lensed device with an LCD screen behind it, something small you can put in front of the camera.

    It would need a special LCD screen, but I think my privacy is worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    It does not stop the car, don't be silly. It will be reported as a malfunction on the dashboard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    On the newer Ford vehicles with Adaptive Cruise Control has a driver-facing camera. If you obscure your image or otherwise hamper the camera, the ACC stops working.

    Its not a full stop of the vehicle, but it prevents the user from using the thing that they paid for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    It's even possible for the car to sound alarm constantly while ADDW camera is covered making driving unbearable but it's still has nothing to do with stopping the car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (6 children)

    I guess we have to remove the alarm too, i guess that we can have mod the car control unit to disable the camera without breaking anything else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (5 children)

    Just change the entire computer while your at it because they may check for error codes. Make sure your custom computer will pass all security checks your car does though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    We should make a community for countrol units mods atp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Or, hear me out, ride a bicycle. It's spelled b-i-c-y-c-l-e.

    If you need to cross some car-only borders, well shit then. Best I can think of is get one of those ewaste grocery store phones with the plan included, sign up for drive share, get over the border, give the phone to a homeless man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    My favorite part of all this is that motorbikes are excluded. Cars now have mandatory automated breaking and some other features like adaptive cruise control (not sure). Motorbikes have none. Why? Because bikers and bike manufacturers are pushing back saying that it will make bikes more expensive and (paraphrasing) it will ruin the fun. And so far EU is buying this. 25% of deadly accidents are bikers and most of those accidents happen during fun rides on the weekend but those accidents are fine apparently. Nothing they can do about it.

    So easiest way to avoid it? Buy a motorbike. You will immediately gain protected status.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I feel like automatic breaking on a bike would be dangerous since there is balance involved?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    Yeah agreed. Go ride a bike and tell your friend to pull out the chain as you pass em and see how badly you want auto breaking on a bike lmfao. You’ll end up with bikers thrown over their bars or whipped off the side of their bike much much more often if they aren’t in control of it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Maybe you're right, but I also think the difference is due to how the EU is trying to justify this : they say their IR camera will help lower phone use while driving.

    It's very hard to use the same rhetoric against motorcycles, because you actually always need both hands to drive, making phone use far more hard and risky than with a car.

    And anyway, most motorbike crashes aren't due to inattention but mostly overspeed, which an IR camera won't help to deal with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago

    Detecting phone use is just a tiny part of it. ADDW is about detecting distraction and drowsiness in general but they are also mandating speeding alerts. The car is supposed to monitor the speed limit and alert the driver when he's driver above it. As you can imagine those systems work like shit and beep at you constantly, even when you drive below the speed limit. You also have mandatory lane assist and automated breaking. Nothing is required for bikes. So basically big chunk of fatal accidents are caused by people speeding for fun on country roads, lane splitting and doing other completely unnecessary things and EU is just accepting that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Motorcyclists are so much more likely to hurt/kill themselves in an accident, compared to car drivers who are much more likely to injure/kill someone else while only sustaining minor injuries.
    I consider it a rather strong incentive to ride safely.
    Furthermore, riding a bike is a much more involved activity compared to driving, which makes distracted driving a lot less likely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I consider it a rather strong incentive to ride safely.

    Vast majority of the motorcycle accidents I read about are self inflicted. Just bikers falling down on mountain roads. Yes, majority ride safely but the ones that get into accidents drive like idiots. As I said, most accidents happen on weekends during rides for fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Source on this?

    I heard this through the grapevine, but haven't seen a real article about it yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    This https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/safer-cars-safer-roads-new-rules-take-effect-2026-07-08_en does not explicitly mention "camera", like most news articles does, but I guess the points

    Advanced driver distraction warning system to keep drivers focused

    and

    Better forward vision

    are a bit hard to implement without camera + computer vision.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    But there is no requirement to send that data anywhere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    Automakers collect and store all data by default. If there's no law saying they CAN'T collect it then they're gonna collect it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago

    Data is a valuable commodity. I think one car company filed a patent not long ago for a system that listens to conversations in the car and then serves advertisements on the central console based on those.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago*

    I recently watched a few videos about people taking the modems/WiFi boxes out of their new cars to stop the constant data collection.
    On one of the videos there's a warning that if you attach your phone to your car then the car will almost certainly start to contact through the BT to 'phone home' again to send data that way.

    I've got no idea if any of it is all true, but with today's data collection companies mining everything they can then I can easily believe it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)